Jump to content

The Mourinho Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

He didn't spoil anything. Everyone dies in the Game of Thrones. You should already know that ^^

Specially a character like Tywin.

Fuck man why spoil things away for all of us!

Alright mods, ban him since he change the subject! :Goober:

I don't didn't see what HD3D was referring to in Episode 4. I am upset that HD3D didn't tell me about the Night's King. Getting back to the topic - Jose's masterplan worked to perfection. He put in Hungry players that he knew could get a result. Lpuke were expecting the usual suspect & were completely blindsided. Now they are trying to spin that Chelsea are anti-football. Sorry did I miss something in the match? Did Chelsea pick up the ball & carry it across the goal line? Don't mess w/ the Mind of Mourinho or you will get burn

Mourinho-Smirk_zpscb7857cc.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What many dont get is that it's not only defending. It's defending exceptionally well, with every player doing what they are supposed to while trusting in one another. We made the best attack in the Premier League look like complete fools!

And for the Loserpool fans calling our "style" anti-football, they better wash their fucking mouths. What we did is well within the rules. However, what really is anti-football is all that cheating that evolves that club: diving, referee's bias, FA protection, non-existing goals, Hillsborough overdose, etc!

I am not sure if you read this quote from Mark Schwarzer, but it's an excellent retort for those fools who feel that Chelsea doesn't play proper footie:

Mark Schwarzer - "It’s quite amusing to hear the criticism because the bottom line is there was a tactic we employed and it worked down to a tee. We played within the rules and we played the best way we thought we could get a result, tried to frustrate Liverpool and it worked.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure if you read this quote from Mark Schwarzer, but it's an excellent retort for those fools who feel that Chelsea doesn't play proper footie:

Mark Schwarzer - "It’s quite amusing to hear the criticism because the bottom line is there was a tactic we employed and it worked down to a tee. We played within the rules and we played the best way we thought we could get a result, tried to frustrate Liverpool and it worked.”

He absolutely nailed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zabaleta defending us and Mourinho

That's what really matters. We're in an UCL SF and we're fighting for the title. The haters are jealous and bitter, but deep down everyone thinks this way. They just keep taking jabs because they get their pride hurt by us. I'm sure Zabaleta would say otherwise if they were the ones losing 0x2 to us (he probably did in one of their two defeats to us). That's the thing, they know deep down (as well as all fans in the world) that what matters the most is the result. Teams will progress and start showing better football as long as they have one of two things 1) stability with managers and players staying for long so they can develop a work throughly; 2) an inherited style that defines the club such as Barça with the tiki taka and Real Madrid as a counter-attack team. We don't have either because José didn't even inherited a style as our last 3-4 managers couldn't have any more different styles and they covered only three seasons. So while I think every fan would like a more appealing and beautiful style you won't see them disregarding a title because we didn't play the most attractive football in the world or at least attractive enough (although I don't doubt a few members here would do that).

x

He absolutely nailed it.

I just saw that your responded Rmpr so I am adding your post here. I have been following CFC for a while now, thanks to beauty of Globlization & internet access. The one thing I have noticed is the fact that CFC have always played a counter-attack style. Back when Zola & the lads where there to now. CFC seem to have a good striker that they can punt the ball to & speed on the flanks. Ok maybe you can say in '09 CFC was more tika taka, but it always seemed that CFC would love to have the speed on the break & look for advantages w/ the strikers isolated against slower defenders. Jose has just put this on another level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or are Liverpool fans starting to sound more and more like Arsenal fans circa 2009 to the day?

There's a striking similarities, they think possession = points, they bang on about how they play the 'best football', lose at home to Chelsea and spend days and days after the match telling whoever will listen they morally won, stubborn manager who would rather lose than abandon his 'principles'.
All they need to do now is spectacularly blow the title and they are in every sense off the word the new Arsenal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liverpool don't really play possession football anyway. Do they expect every team to come to Anfield and attack, just so they can hit them on the counter? Jose slowed the tempo down, wasted time from very early on and Liverpool had no clue about breaking down the defence

robdog, on 29 Apr 2014 - 05:19 AM, said:

in '09 CFC was more tika taka, but it always seemed that CFC would love to have the speed on the break & look for advantages w/ the strikers isolated against slower defenders. Jose has just put this on another level."

09 CFC was not tiki-taka

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You