Jump to content

Transfer Archives

Browse the old player transfer archives.


1,206 topics in this forum

    • 174 replies
    • 35.8k views
  1. Kane or Lukaku? 1 2

    • 29 replies
    • 3.3k views
  2. Neymar

    • 2 replies
    • 1.2k views
  3. Nicolo Zaniolo

    • 14 replies
    • 3.8k views
  4. Lautaro Martinez

    • 19 replies
    • 4.3k views
  5. Declan Rice 1 2 22

    • 428 replies
    • 55.2k views
  6. Hugo Ekitike

    • 5 replies
    • 2.2k views
  7. Endrick

    • 4 replies
    • 2.9k views
  8. Ivan Perisic 1 2 5

    • 81 replies
    • 19.6k views
  9. Federico Chiesa 1 2 3

    • 57 replies
    • 13.5k views
  10. Raphinha

    • 17 replies
    • 3.5k views
  11. Erling Haaland 1 2 45

    • 882 replies
    • 97.8k views
  12. Kylian Mbappe 1 2 12

    • 227 replies
    • 45.5k views
  13. Gareth Bale 1 2 3

    • 57 replies
    • 11.1k views
    • 46 replies
    • 9.8k views
  14. Jack Grealish 1 2 5

    • 92 replies
    • 16.7k views
    • 1.5k replies
    • 182.9k views
  15. Edmond Tapsoba

    • 1 reply
    • 2k views
  16. Harry Kane 1 2 18

    • 348 replies
    • 45.6k views
  17. Kalvin Phillips

    • 7 replies
    • 1.9k views
  18. Robin Gosens

    • 11 replies
    • 2.4k views
  19. Sandro Tonali 1 2 3

    • 44 replies
    • 10.5k views
  20. Nicolo Barella 1 2 22

    • 430 replies
    • 51.4k views
  21. Jonathan David

    • 3 replies
    • 1.5k views
  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Recent Posts

    • What he means was they sniffed a profit on the back of previous success...
    • Beghdad Eghbali in 2021: “We thought Chelsea [was] frankly an asset, a business that was not terribly well managed on the football side, sporting side or promotional side”
    • “I’m struggling to believe what I’m told” – Matt Law makes concerning Chelsea statement https://Chelsea.news/2026/02/im-struggling-to-believe-what-im-told-matt-law-makes-concerning-Chelsea-statement/ The Telegraph journalist Matt Law has this week made a concerning statement on Chelsea’s front of shirt sponsorship issues. Last week, we finally saw Chelsea play a game with a sponsors on the front of their shirt. But IFS.ai will not be the permanent front of shirt sponsor for The Bl
    • Yes, it seems clubs are run as pure businesses, with the actual football a side dish just for us fans to lap up. Figures released today showed the PL received almost the same cash 1.3 bn TV revenue, than all the other leagues combined 1.4bn. So we can see why billionaires 'invest' in it. Myself and mates dont watch with the same enthusiasm now though. A lot of black humour returning, same as when we were shit 😁  On the positive, we can thank the fact  we lived through Chelseas greatest ever
    • The remaining content of this topic is not viewable to guests.

      You can sign in to your account at the login page here

      If you do not have an account then you can register here

  • Player Threads

×
×
  • Create New...