milka 3,394 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 obviously we won't take anyone today just don't know why we sold Zouma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,938 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 19 minutes ago, Sevillista said: Perfect. You have a very good team despite not having Kounde. But Azpilicueta measures exactly the same as Kounde. But Kounde has a much higher jumping ability. I'm sure you will have a great year in the Premier and in the Champions League. It was tounge in cheek. I don't care if Kounde is small... he is a fantastic player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoroccanBlue 5,382 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 Forget Kounde. Get Saul done. Blue Armour 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero 1,871 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 FUCK SEVILLA Vesper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 20 minutes ago, milka said: obviously we won't take anyone today just don't know why we sold Zouma Because Tuchel doesn't rate him and gave his spot to an academy player. Muzchap, Superblue and Clockwork 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vybz Kartel 1,613 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 Why do we never back our managers after winning titles? Its truly weird. DH1988 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azul 1,615 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 1 hour ago, Strike said: Who though? If its not Saul on loan or Rice. Saul, and Chelsea for some reason want an option to buy instead of obligation. Which make me think that they don't trust Tuchels judgement on the players he wants. If Tuchel wants Saul then why can't we just agree on the fact that its an obligation to pay next summer? The fee between Atleti and Chelsea has been agreed btw, there's just a conflict about it being a loan with option or loan with obligation to buy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milka 3,394 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mário César 1,255 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 Game over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chelsea_4_eva 1,182 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 I dont think the board have any intention of paying buy out clause, may aswell focus on Saul. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mário César 1,255 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 We shoudn't sold zouma ffs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZAPHOD2319 4,818 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 16 minutes ago, Vybz Kartel said: Why do we never back our managers after winning titles? Its truly weird. Lukaku is a pretty big addition considering the lack of strikers available. We also finally cut down our bloated squad. Trevor's emergance is like getting another player. Muzchap and Fernando 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZAPHOD2319 4,818 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 1 minute ago, chelsea_4_eva said: I dont think the board have any intention of paying buy out clause, may aswell focus on Saul. If Saul really is around 300k Euros a week....that is insanity for a player out of form and a 4th option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sevillista 17 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duppy Conqueror 1,534 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 20 minutes ago, Azul said: Saul, and Chelsea for some reason want an option to buy instead of obligation. Which make me think that they don't trust Tuchels judgement on the players he wants. If Tuchel wants Saul then why can't we just agree on the fact that its an obligation to pay next summer? The fee between Atleti and Chelsea has been agreed btw, there's just a conflict about it being a loan with option or loan with obligation to buy. I don't think it's a case of not trusting Tuchel's judgement atall.more a case of a combination of other factors.1) we have Conor and Billy waiting in the wings.2) I don't see Saul being a flop but may be just so so we as has been evidenced many times in the Roman era,we buy players at either fair or inflated prices, when we want to offload some ,those clubs want to take the piss with loans or bargain guys or worse we just get stuck with them being in our books. the reported 34m ain't a bad price but see what salary he would then have. I think one of Kovacic,Jorginho or Saul would leave next summer ,if we aren't tied to Saul then that decision is easier. Magic Lamps and Muzchap 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 22 minutes ago, Azul said: Saul, and Chelsea for some reason want an option to buy instead of obligation. Which make me think that they don't trust Tuchels judgement on the players he wants. If Tuchel wants Saul then why can't we just agree on the fact that its an obligation to pay next summer? The fee between Atleti and Chelsea has been agreed btw, there's just a conflict about it being a loan with option or loan with obligation to buy. There is a very real possibility that Tuchel views Saul in much the same way as the club. A potential stop gap option this season that could develop into a permanent signing or otherwise move on to another target next season. If Tuchel was adamant that he wanted Saul permanently and he was the man for that midfield spot long term, I think the club would take the step to buy him at the prices being touted. Atomiswave and Muzchap 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azul 1,615 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 3 minutes ago, Duppy Conqueror said: I don't think it's a case of not trusting Tuchel's judgement atall.more a case of a combination of other factors.1) we have Conor and Billy waiting in the wings.2) I don't see Saul being a flop but may be just so so we as has been evidenced many times in the Roman era,we buy players at either fair or inflated prices, when we want to offload some ,those clubs want to take the piss with loans or bargain guys or worse we just get stuck with them being in our books. the reported 34m ain't a bad price but see what salary he would then have. I think one of Kovacic,Jorginho or Saul would leave next summer ,if we aren't tied to Saul then that decision is easier. Personal terms with Saul has been agreed as per every reliable source. The reason we didn't sign him is literally because the board don't trust Tuchels judgement IF the reports from Matt Law, Fabrizio Romano etc are to be trusted. We agreed personal terms, fee as well it's just that Chelsea want to have an option to buy incase he flops instead of committing to the transfer. Which means that they don't trust Tuchels judgement bro, why not commit to the transfer that Tuchels asking for? Boycie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azul 1,615 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Superblue_1986 said: There is a very real possibility that Tuchel views Saul in much the same way as the club. A potential stop gap option this season that could develop into a permanent signing or otherwise move on to another target next season. If Tuchel was adamant that he wanted Saul permanently and he was the man for that midfield spot long term, I think the club would take the step to buy him at the prices being touted. I agree, I'm just going off of every 'reliable' source. I'm just repeating what the likes of Romano, Matt Law, Simon Johnson have been reporting. If what they say is wrong information then there's no problem basically. Edited August 31, 2021 by Azul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 9 minutes ago, Azul said: I agree, I'm just going off of every 'reliable' source. I'm just repeating what the likes of Romano, Matt Law, Simon Johnson have been reporting. If what they say is wrong information then there's no problem basically. I'm not questioning if you're right or wrong, but I haven't seen anything reported that suggests Tuchel wants Saul to be signed permanently and the club is against this. I've seen reports that Tuchel would like him if possible, but this again plays into the possibility that he's discussed this option with the club and if he can be signed on loan then great, but they don't want to commit to a permanent buy currently. I guess some of these reports are unfortunately open to interpretation. Muzchap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 16 minutes ago, Azul said: Personal terms with Saul has been agreed as per every reliable source. The reason we didn't sign him is literally because the board don't trust Tuchels judgement IF the reports from Matt Law, Fabrizio Romano etc are to be trusted. We agreed personal terms, fee as well it's just that Chelsea want to have an option to buy incase he flops instead of committing to the transfer. Which means that they don't trust Tuchels judgement bro, why not commit to the transfer that Tuchels asking for? As fantastic as a coach as Tuchel is his record in the market is historically sketchy, that plus the experience with Conte means I can understand why they're a little sceptical going all in on all his wishes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.