The Tuchel Thread

[manpe 10,861]

4 hours ago, DDA said:

I think he's hung his hat on this particular system because he saw how effective it was when winning the Champions League. 

But

Our attacking play is unbarrable to watch now. Something has to give.

Inflexibility is what's got several of our managers sacked before. Mourinho, Conte, Sarri were all dead set in their ways that got them success at first and very rarely tried something different once their tactics got found out and our play got stale. There are signs that Tuchel is going the same way, however it's too soon to pass judgement now and he's been getting the results, let's see where we are at the end of the season.

Edited August 7, 2022 by manpe

[OneMoSalah 8,785]

4 hours ago, MoroccanBlue said:

What's up with Sterling at CF? 

Dont think he was necessarily bad there. Thought he was a positive. 

Actually his ability to take and carry the ball, relieving pressure and getting us up the pitch was impressive.

Plus his movement in and around the box, you can see what playing in a Pep teams done to him, he’s always sniffing around the penalty box, never standing still. 

Was unlucky not to get a goal yesterday. 

[NikkiCFC 8,058]

On 07/08/2022 at 21:04, manpe said:

 There are signs that Tuchel is going the same way

There are no signs he is there from day one. 

[DDA 9,691]

https://youtu.be/BJC6lfeWEiI

[Superblue 6,372]

 

[Nero 1,847]

 

Fuck off you corrupt clowns

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

So no Tuchel against Leeds?…

[Superblue 6,372]

The ban is suspended until Chelsea receive the written report and reasons for it so available for Leeds.

[Superblue 6,372]

The bigger question is why are both being treated differently, unless Tuchel's is essentially punishment for his post match comments.

It gives me vibes from a few years ago when Chelsea and Spurs got charged for the brawl when they bottled the title and we got fined about 3 times as much as them.

Get fed up of the inconsistency the FA choose to show.

[Bren 41]

3 minutes ago, Superblue_1986 said:

The bigger question is why are both being treated differently, unless Tuchel's is essentially punishment for his post match comments.

It gives me vibes from a few years ago when Chelsea and Spurs got charged for the brawl when they bottled the title and we got fined about 3 times as much as them.

Get fed up of the inconsistency the FA choose to show.

I thought the two were being treated differently (Tuchel's comments). Could be wrong.

They just hold Chelsea to higher standards that's all 😂 🙄

[Superblue 6,372]

38 minutes ago, Bren said:

I thought the two were being treated differently (Tuchel's comments). Could be wrong.

They just hold Chelsea to higher standards that's all 😂 🙄

If that is indeed the case then it only makes this worse as they are essentially being charged for the same thing (one would assume) and receiving different charges.

I'd assume Tuchel will be given a further fine for the comments then but really wouldn't put it past the FA to add to the ban. We play Liverpool soon so they're probably eyeing that game up to get him off the touchline.

[Bren 41]

1 hour ago, Superblue_1986 said:

If that is indeed the case then it only makes this worse as they are essentially being charged for the same thing (one would assume) and receiving different charges.

I'd assume Tuchel will be given a further fine for the comments then but really wouldn't put it past the FA to add to the ban. We play Liverpool soon so they're probably eyeing that game up to get him off the touchline.

Yeah I think it is separate: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2022/aug/15/fa-investigate-thomas-tuchel-Chelsea-have-issues-with-referee-comment-football

Quote

The Football Association is investigating Thomas Tuchel’s remarks regarding Anthony Taylor after Chelsea’s head coach suggested the referee should no longer officiate his side’s games.

Tuchel, who is already likely to be hit with a one-game ban after his extraordinary touchline clash over a handshake with Antonio Conte at the end of Chelsea’s 2-2 draw with Tottenham on Sunday, is facing the prospect of further disciplinary action by appearing to question Taylor’s impartiality.

 

[Fernando 6,488]

Oh boy it's going to be ugly with no strikers. 

Guess they was right, the media about Tottenham that are in better position because we have no striker. 

Going to be a long season. 

[lucio 5,418]

Plays overly defensive football and still gets smashed by Leeds. Shocking coach 

[kellzfresh 7,229]

On 07/08/2022 at 13:14, kellzfresh said:

We don't create chances with through balls through the middle of the pitch from midfield.

We don't create chances through combination plays like one twos or one touch passes like mancity

We don't create chances through individual dribblers on the pitch since we lost Hazard

We don't create chances by pinging the ball into space to find runners like Liverpool

We only create from wingbacks.

This is why our attacking is dross. Until we mix things up and have other ways to attack opponents, we will continue to be boring to watch. I don't know if Tuchel has identified this problem because it's bad.

We have no accurate passers in the whole team

We have no finishers or dribblers who can create something out of nothing in attack

and Tuchel is focusing the whole money on DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE

No team with a poor attack can ever do well in the premier league. Forget it the best attacks come first or second. You can't have the 8th best attack and hope for magic

[Fernando 6,488]

I think we should focus on defense instead of attack because there's no good striker right now. 

Fix defense first. 

[Stats 7,059]

34 minutes ago, Fernando said:

Oh boy it's going to be ugly with no strikers. 

Guess they was right, the media about Tottenham that are in better position because we have no striker. 

Going to be a long season. 

We never lost the game because of no striker. Leeds scored three without a recognised CF. Poor tactics and outsmarted. I sat on the fence with my criticism, but a bit alarming that 3 games one and not one midfielder or attacker has scored a goal from open play. 

[Fernando 6,488]

7 minutes ago, Stats said:

We never lost the game because of no striker. Leeds scored three without a recognised CF. Poor tactics and outsmarted. I sat on the fence with my criticism, but a bit alarming that 3 games one and not one midfielder or attacker has scored a goal from open play. 

I think we lack in the midfield and that's why fdj would have been amazing.