Mario Gómez

[Muzchap 8,966]

We need a fat cunt to sit in the box and score tap ins. How many times have we seen good crosses not finished because we have no striker in and around the 6 yard box? Torres is too busy running around like a headless fuckwit and he hardly gets into the box as much. If we can get him for 20 million I'd take him tbh.

We got 'Fat' Frank for another year remember:)

God knows how he got that nickname? He's always been in excellent shape!

[OneMoSalah 8,783]

We got 'Fat' Frank for another year remember:)

God knows how he got that nickname? He's always been in excellent shape!

His West Ham days he was really chubbyish. His dad used to train him to get him fitter and into better shape when he was younger. Worked a treat.

[James W Clark 28]

Gomez? FUCK NO. We already have Ba and Lukalu. .

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

Lukaku >>>>>>> Gomez

We will be fool to buy Gomez instead of giving Lukaku a chance.

[Badboy 1,526]

Gomez is one of the slowest players I've seen in terms of turning and his complete lack of agility. He would completely ruin our team he would really damage us as a club we really don't need him. We dealt with him so easily in the Champions League final that most of us don't even remember him playing that game, he played the whole game including the penalty shoot out and even at 25 years of age Drogba at 34 looked younger and fresher lol !

[jasonlol 154]

Not good enough in fifa 13. DISAPPROVE

[mybodyisready 155]

Gomez? I'd rather have a nice clean weiner in my mouth and I'm not even gay

[mtowle182 79]

Your fucking up if you think he isn't good in FIFA hahaha

[Sovieticus 743]

Not good enough in fifa 13. DISAPPROVE

He's bad at fifa because he has shit pace. Face the truth.

[Special Juan 27,439]

Yeah I normally gauge everything on FIFA and Football Manager.

[Jype 6,398]

If our primary targets join other clubs and we're left with second rate options like Mario Gomez, why buy anyone just for the sake of buying? We could just invest the money elsewhere and recall Lukaku. Hell, I'd probably even keep Torres rather than buy Gomez. I'm not saying he's a shit player or anything, in fact I rate him and he's quite a goalscorer, but if the very best players aren't available to us, we're better off trying our luck with Lukaku who's already proven to be a very good player.

[Magic Lamps 11,668]

If City get Cavani and we only get Gomez this would be the ultimate MCA

[mediator 2,026]

Okay maybe that means lukaku will be our numb 1 striker and we take a proven one ( ) like Gomez "in case of".

And we would get rid of Torres and Ba as 3th option

[yuvala 2,167]

Please no...

[Toli 977]

Okay maybe that means lukaku will be our numb 1 striker and we take a proven one ( ) like Gomez "in case of".

And we would get rid of Torres and Ba as 3th option

yeah because gomez would accept sitting on the bench while a 20-year old kid is playing as a 1st striker..of course.

[Beepu 1,714]

It seems likely, although not 100% that we will miss out on cavani, lewandowski, and falcao. Is gomez really that bad of a choice??

Yeah compared to those 3 he seems a horrible choice, his build up play is not as good. But he scores goals, not beautiful ones but he does score. Isnt that what we need, to finish those easy tap ins against smaller teams where we constantly drop points?? Im not a fan of his but i dont think its as bad as some people make it to be.

[Magic Lamps 11,668]

It seems likely, although not 100% that we will miss out on cavani, lewandowski, and falcao. Is gomez really that bad of a choice??

Yeah compared to those 3 he seems a horrible choice, his build up play is not as good. But he scores goals, not beautiful ones but he does score. Isnt that what we need, to finish those easy tap ins against smaller teams where we constantly drop points?? Im not a fan of his but i dont think its as bad as some people make it to be.

Lukaku can score tap ins, too. You don't pay 25m for a player who only scores tap ins vs small teams. He is technically average and does not contribute to the play of his time, this will be detrimental to our playing style.

[Reddish-Blue 2,354]

It seems likely, although not 100% that we will miss out on cavani, lewandowski, and falcao. Is gomez really that bad of a choice??

Yeah compared to those 3 he seems a horrible choice, his build up play is not as good. But he scores goals, not beautiful ones but he does score. Isnt that what we need, to finish those easy tap ins against smaller teams where we constantly drop points?? Im not a fan of his but i dont think its as bad as some people make it to be.

I think we'll be able to find an average player for less than 25m, who is capable of scoring tap-ins against small teams.

He doesn't fit our style of play. We need a top-class forward to lead the line next season