Spike

I remember why I only post on here once or twice a year. See you in six months.

How about this 'Win or loss, Puliszola's logic is shyte'. It doesn't even matter if Jorginho is a good player or not because the means of coming to that conclusion are rubbish.

That isn't logical or even a worthwhile statistic because it ignores nearly every other fundamental influence on the sport, to look at the sport in such a simple manner is reductive, pointless, and ultimately signals a lack of critical thinking. That is just cause-effect with conjecture. A player can have a good game in a loss, and a bad game in a win. A team sport is typically won and lost through the team, not one player; ergo the only bias here is coming from you. The information you've completely ignored: The other ten Chelsea players and subs The eleven opposition plus

Christ almighty, I was 17 when I joined

Imagine having a bad game occasionally.

Not too keen on this bloke, really.

Does Onana even start for Cameroon?

@Fulham Broadway did you recommend me this band about a decade ago?

This will play out in two ways; he will either be sold and win the Balon d'Or, or he won't be and will be worse than watching Anelkalouda in their prime.

Sarriball is a stupid term.

Hey Strike I don't disagree, but I think it is risky and threatening to their long terms careers if they are overplayed.

I regret this thread.

I hope those pining for his return aren't the same as the few that lamented and damned him when he joined Manchester City.

Oh, Hazard I will miss you. I don't disagree with the move but it doesn't mean I have to approve. England is conquered, the ever consumate professional hungers for new challenges and to step out of a comfort zone is difficult and admirable.