Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mário César said:

Just for precaution

I don't trust anything about knees when it comes to dropping £80m.

Pass atm.

I am super paranoid about buying injured players.

A few more ultra expensive bad buys and the club will be destroyed for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Vesper said:

Real Madrid set new lower 'price limit' in Alphonso Davies pursuit

  • Real Madrid hoping to sign Alphonso Davies for as little as possible
  • Canadian left-back a long-term target for new La Liga champions
  • Bayern Munich contract talks haven't progressed in recent months

https://www.90min.com/real-madrid-set-new-lower-price-limit-alphonso-davies

 

Real Madrid are reported to have set themselves a price limit when it comes to signing Bayern Munich left-back Alphonso Davies this summer.

Davies has been a long-term target for Madrid and will imminently enter the final year of his contract with Bayern, limiting what the German giants can realistically get for him in way of a transfer fee. But the threat of him potentially leaving as a free agent in 2025 could force Bayern's hand to sell if no new deal is agreed.

Davies and Bayern are believed to have been at an impasse as far as contract negotiations are concerned, with the player seeking a salary befitting his status as one of the best in the world in his position. The club have made their offer, which falls short of what the Davies camp asked for.

Madrid seem calm. Relevo writes that their plan is to sign Davies for as little as possible, capitalising of the situation that has so far unfolded, with a potential price range of just €30m to €35m. That is down further from a previous estimation of €40m.

They look set to play hard ball over the possible fee to keep it low and have the added advantage of two existing left-backs in Ferland Mendy and Fran Garcia they appear prepared to go into 2024/25 with. It means they are not desperate to buy, which could hurt Bayern's negotiating position.

Even for a player entering the final year of a contract, an upper limit of €35m seems low for someone of Davies' calibre and reputation. For reference, Transfermarkt currently values him at €50m. A report in Germany in March also suggested Bayern's price tag had been set at €60m.

Madrid are not the only club interested in Davies. But, as 90min reported in November, Liverpool, Chelsea, Manchester City and Paris Saint-Germain have been reluctant to put too much into any sort of approach due to the belief that the player has his heart set on a move to the Bernabeu.

Davies himself has refused to rule out leaving Bayern, telling reporters after the recent Champions League semi-final second leg in Madrid that he is grateful to the club "whatever happens".

I know he's a quality option but and has opportunities to go anywhere but this would make me so happy for next season if we could get fellow Canadian Phonzie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

You and me both. It would nice to see "proven" before any buzzword.

    
Ronald Araujo 
Alessandro Bastoni 
Matthijs de Ligt 
Bremer  
António Silva  
Giorgio Scalvini  
Mohamed Simakan
Jean-Clair Todibo
Alessandro Buongiorno 
Riccardo Calafiori   

 

youth:

Leny Yoro 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Vesper said:

    
Ronald Araujo 
Alessandro Bastoni 
Matthijs de Ligt 
Bremer  
António Silva  
Giorgio Scalvini  
Mohamed Simakan
Jean-Clair Todibo
Alessandro Buongiorno 
Riccardo Calafiori   

 

youth:

Leny Yoro 

Bastion, along with Barella (if Gallagher does move on), are who I've been calling for. There is always something about not having two left-footed starting CBs, but if they can do the job, talent should take precedence over anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

It is sounding more dead than ever.

 

Using his age as a turnoff is silly and kind of concerning as well. The dude is 25. Not even in his prime yet. He ain’t 30. The meme’s about our ownership only wanting to buy 17 year olds is starting to becoming reality. 

They are (and should be) mandating a top 4 finish this coming season. And yet they want to give a brand new manager some unproven 20 year striker who will have to hit the ground running? It makes no sense.

I don’t want Osimhen as I’ve say for the past couple of weeks but his profile in terms of age and expericend is exactly what we should want. Someone 23-25, proven at a high level, and someone we can be confident in coming and scoring straight away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pizy said:

Using his age as a turnoff is silly and kind of concerning as well. The dude is 25. Not even in his prime yet. He ain’t 30. The meme’s about our ownership only wanting to buy 17 year olds is starting to becoming reality. 

They are (and should be) mandating a top 4 finish this coming season. And yet they want to give a brand new manager some unproven 20 year striker who will have to hit the ground running? It makes no sense.

I don’t want Osimhen as I’ve say for the past couple of weeks but his profile in terms of age and expericend is exactly what we should want. Someone 23-25, proven at a high level, and someone we can be confident in coming and scoring straight away.

Everything points to us becoming nothing more than a feeder club. More often than not, this includes questionable appointments and signing players who can't even legally drink.

Edited by LAM09
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys really buy into these easy media narratives they keep repeating. 

Vic ain't it, regardless. And the age thing here, is probably how much they want to pay for the transfer fee given how many great years he has. 

Enzo and Caceido are early 20s, and that investment makes sense as you are getting 10+ good years from them. 

We are in no way close to becoming a feeder club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Thor said:

You guys really buy into these easy media narratives they keep repeating. 

Vic ain't it, regardless. And the age thing here, is probably how much they want to pay for the transfer fee given how many great years he has. 

Enzo and Caceido are early 20s, and that investment makes sense as you are getting 10+ good years from them. 

We are in no way close to becoming a feeder club.

You clearly haven't been a fan of Osimhen from the start, but you have yet to propose a viable alternative (Jackson has been uttered by you, which is already something in itself). If Osimhen offered half of what DD did during his first spell, the transfer fee would be a no-brainer in this current climate, with Lukaku going the opposite way.

We are selling starters to our rivals, clinching on to the idea of EL football, and we haven't got a WC player in the squad (James & Nkunku are too injury-prone rn to even consider them). Time will tell when Enzo is the first of the big signings to be shipped off. 

Edited by LAM09
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

You clearly haven't been a fan of Osimhen from the start, but you have yet to propose a viable alternative (Jackson has been uttered by you, which is already something in itself). If Osimhen offered half of what DD did during his first spell, the transfer fee would be a no-brainer in this current climate, with Lukaku going the opposite way.

We are selling starters to our rivals, clinching on to the idea of EL football, and we haven't got a WC player in the squad (James & Nkunku are too injury-prone rn to even consider them). Time will tell when Enzo is the first of the big signings to be shipped off. 

Signing him for £100m+ on huge wages would be bonkers. The whole point of the setup is that the club should be able to find an Osimhen before he's at Napoli for £125m and wants £300k+ pw. The signing could very feasibly backfire horribly, leaving us crippled again. We have to learn and do better.

Personally I think NJ could have a breakout season and become the player we need, and think he deserves the chance. We need to be giving players more of a chance than this before we write them off for a more expensive option. If we go for a striker, I would like to go for a very different profile to NJ to give the manager variety, and certainly be spending max £60m / 150k pw.

You could argue only City don't need a no.9 in the PL, but only we are constantly linked with Osimhen for insane money. Wonder why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

You clearly haven't been a fan of Osimhen from the start, but you have yet to propose a viable alternative (Jackson has been uttered by you, which is already something in itself). If Osimhen offered half of what DD did during his first spell, the transfer fee would be a no-brainer in this current climate, with Lukaku going the opposite way.

We are selling starters to our rivals, clinching on to the idea of EL football, and we haven't got a WC player in the squad (James & Nkunku are too injury-prone rn to even consider them). Time will tell when Enzo is the first of the big signings to be shipped off. 

I wouldn't mind Osimhen - where am I not a fan? 100+ mil for him is ridiculous though. Nico and VO both scored 17 goals this season. Why are we paying that much for someone? Victor has had 1 good season. 1. O N E. Where in the world would we considering 120 mil a decent transfer for him? 

Nico literally gave you a better than DD 1st season performance - and you still complain... 

 

Which starters are we selling to rivals? Jorgi? He is a bench player at Arsenal. Havertz? Do you want him back? Kovacic? Again - why? He wasn't anything special at City aside from being another cog in a well oiled machine. A stop gap. 

We came 6th in a pretty miserable season as far as continuity and injuries go. DD had seasons of barely cracking 10 goals and was lauded because of how our team clicked and because we were winning. Jackson would be equally praised if our defenders could defend and our manager set our midfield up correctly from the start of the season. No one wants to wait at all. No one here has the slightest bit of patience. We literally watched a young team get better - and now we want to add more players for 100 mil+ when they themselves are unproven. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 1 member are here!

×
×
  • Create New...