Chelsea Transfers

[whats happening 1,615]

gnabry would be the best option. he's not that expensive either. but it looks like he does not want to come here or our people are not interested in him for some reason.

[Clockwork 1,794]

15 hours ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

It sounds like Boehly stepped in and put this to rest.

 

 

I don’t think this is true, Matt Law said Lukaku was not wanting to stay, Tuchel would have give him another opportunity if he was committed. 
 

 

[ZAPHOD2319 4,814]

10 minutes ago, Clockwork said:

I don’t think this is true, Matt Law said Lukaku was not wanting to stay, Tuchel would have give him another opportunity if he was committed. 
 

 

I think Marina would have held out for more from Inter and didn’t care if Lukaku was forced to stay. That could have been terrible for us going forward as far as team building and distractions. 
 

At the end of the day, we will probably never know the finer details.

[whats happening 1,615]

14 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

I think Marina would have held out for more from Inter and didn’t care if Lukaku was forced to stay. That could have been terrible for us going forward as far as team building and distractions. 

this makes sense, knowing how she operated

[ZAPHOD2319 4,814]

I hope he is given a serious roll and stays.

 

[Blues Forever 1,232]

Barcelona currently doesn’t want to pay €60m for Kounde. They hope to bring down Sevilla’s asking price. There is still no offer either, because the economic levers must be activated first.

Edited June 22, 2022 by Blues Forever

[chelsea_4_eva 1,182]

It seems like Kounde is not top of TTs preferred choice as a CB, the way we are dealing with it atm gives me the vibe of us feeling the price tag is too high (we have not even started negotiating) and if he ends up else where then so be it.. seeing as we have an agreement in place with the player but not pulling the trigger just yet for the buy.. We could also be keeping an eye on the status of TTs preferred targets

Edited June 22, 2022 by chelsea_4_eva

[Strike 7,486]

Signing both Sterling and Raphinha would cost over 100m. Don't see the club bidding for both with 2 CBs to be signed as well. 

[Blues Forever 1,232]

 

[Tomo 21,751]

19 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

 

On another note the fact that teams that haven't won or even challenged for anything in yonks are getting so financially rewarded to the point they can reject £60m (In Leeds/Raphina's case) or over £100m (in WHU/Rice case) to pluck two examples is all ends of wrong for me.

Back in 2004 Everton had to sell Wayne Rooney to even get by.

[YorkshireBlue 3,274]

34 minutes ago, Tomo said:

On another note the fact that teams that haven't won or even challenged for anything in yonks are getting so financially rewarded to the point they can reject £60m (In Leeds/Raphina's case) or over £100m (in WHU/Rice case) to pluck two examples is all ends of wrong for me.

Back in 2004 Everton had to sell Wayne Rooney to even get by.

A player is worth what a club values them at why sell for 35 if u can get 65? These clubs know how much money teams have nowadays, as my Leeds fans pals would say pay big or fuck off lol.

[Tomo 21,751]

10 minutes ago, Kong said:

A player is worth what a club values them at why sell for 35 if u can get 65? These clubs know how much money teams have nowadays, as my Leeds fans pals would say pay big or fuck off lol.

Don't get me wrong I don't blame the club, I blame the system that heavily rewards such underachieving.

Leeds shouldn't be in a position where they can turn down £60m for a player and West Ham defiently shouldn't be in a position to demand £150m for one.

[YorkshireBlue 3,274]

17 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Don't get me wrong I don't blame the club, I blame the system that heavily rewards such underachieving.

Leeds shouldn't be in a position where they can turn down £60m for a player and West Ham defiently shouldn't be in a position to demand £150m for one.

Your not wrong. But I think it will get worse before it gets better. 60 mill is the new 30 100 mill is the new 50 etc etc, I heard now I don't know if this is facts but this haaland transfer will total 250m in the end.

[Clockwork 1,794]

19 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Don't get me wrong I don't blame the club, I blame the system that heavily rewards such underachieving.

Leeds shouldn't be in a position where they can turn down £60m for a player and West Ham defiently shouldn't be in a position to demand £150m for one.

EPL tv rights and money distribution is primary responsible, equal distribution of money is terrible and it gives lower club a lot of power.

[YorkshireBlue 3,274]

13 minutes ago, Clockwork said:

EPL tv rights and money distribution is primary responsible, equal distribution of money is terrible and it gives lower club a lot of power.

Lower clubs? I don't agree that clubs with owners not as rich as some should receive less money from the EPL. You simply can't say because we are Chelsea we are entitled more then say Brighton, don't u ever forget that we once was a lower club, so have some respect and don't turn your nose up at clubs like we used to be.