milka 3,395 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Lol - 160 pages and nothing official iceboy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 7, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted May 7, 2013 Let me help you a bit & all those who think how great Chelsea were.In the late 70s & 80s, the club spending much of the period in the 2nd Division with large debts.In the mid-90s foreign stars Zola, Gullit, Vialli helped the club to win FA Cup in 97, their 1st trophy in 26 years.League Cup in 98 & FA Cup in 00. The real Chelsea as one of England´s top clubs,,, when Jose came on board & won PL title in 05. The rest..the club is very much in the thick of things.You don't need to help me at all. You need to help your ignorant self if you think CFC were mid-table before Roman came. Go look up our the final positions we finished in before Roman came. That is the most ignorant thing any Chelsea "fan" can say. Fernando, Phil Driver, Styles and 8 others 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 LOL at the panic here when Jose said he's thinking of staying at Madrid I don't think that means he's 100% staying, but I didn't think he's 100% returning when he made the quotes after the CL exit. Heisenberg 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yuvala 2,167 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 LOL at the panic here when Jose said he's thinking of staying at Madrid I don't think that means he's 100% staying, but I didn't think he's 100% returning when he made the quotes after the CL exit. I think he's like 90% out ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulsterchelsea 3,221 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Jose is playing this perfectly. Hes making his position at madrid untenable. come home special one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 You don't need to help me at all. You need to help your ignorant self if you think CFC were mid-table before Roman came. Go look up our the final positions we finished in before Roman came. That is the most ignorant thing any Chelsea "fan" can say. You are not reading well.Over the years, in general, Chelsea were not the top club before Roman came.Just admit it & don´t be an ignorant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 You are not reading well.Over the years, in general, Chelsea were not the top club before Roman came.Just admit it & don´t be an ignorant.Admit what? You didn't say that - you said Chelsea were mid table before Roman came, and the facts are that we weren't, I merely pointed that out. You need to articulate yourself better and stop acting so ignorant. Mr_President 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Admit what? You didn't say that - you said Chelsea were mid table before Roman came, and the facts are that we weren't, I merely pointed that out. You need to articulate yourself better and stop acting so ignorant.You still need to learn to read better !Once you do that, we won´t have these insults & dribbles here.Now, I hope you know Chelsea were not as good as some of you claimed here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 7, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted May 7, 2013 You still need to learn to read better !Once you do that, we won´t have these insults & dribbles here.Now, I hope you know Chelsea were not as good as some of you claimed here.Oh FFS come off it! No one said CFC were a top top club before Abramovich came here, stop saying that! You were the one that said "Chelsea were mid table before Abramovich came" which simply isn't true!Here are Chelsea's league finishes 5 years before Abramovich came and took over, I can't believe I have to list them and spell it out to you as any decent Chelsea fan would know them (or in fact, a simple Google search will help as well):1998: 4th1999: 3rd2000: 5th2001: 6th2002: 6th2003: 4thDoes that look like mid table to you? Like I said, STOP BEING SO IGNORANT IN SAYING THAT CHELSEA WERE MID TABLE BEFORE ROMAN CAME. You sound like a bloody idiot.Can we get back to intelligently discussing Mourinho now? bluephoenix, Jype, Danelka and 18 others 21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TacticalBlues 2,817 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 You still need to learn to read better !Once you do that, we won´t have these insults & dribbles here.Now, I hope you know Chelsea were not as good as some of you claimed here.As has been mentioned, why are you being so ignorant? We're not Man City, aka the club that were bought from the abyss of mediocrity and will forever be in United's shadow. We were a team with a good foundation prior to Roman's arrival. He certainly catalysed us to the very top but the fact is, we weren't a mid-table team. The Skipper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Bad shape but still start ahead of a better one in Lopez just because he is a legend? I'm glad you are not our manager.Barca has won 3 consecutive league titles before Madrid won it last year, that's the definition of "end a dominance", no?How come he lost run with barca this year for 11 points? How come that title was decided before december. Mou made real a better club, but he was piss poor this season in all competitions. End of dominance my ass. Barca in best would destroy this real too. Liga was lost after first few weeks and Real wasnt realy good in cl groups, while he made it to semis by luck, United could have won and gala destryed them in turkey. Not to speak of disaster in Dortmund. His preparations ahead of Dortmund game in germany were terrible. No pressure, no pivot mobility, underestimating Bvb etc. And in second leg, he keeps playing with higuain and benches Benzema. About Casillas, it could be very personal issue. It was known before this season that Casillas and Mou werent friends because Marca (Ikers wife works there) was publishing all kinds of shit about Mou...And ok Lopez was better and Iker was benched, but by no mean Mou should speak so badly of Iker in any way. Like blaiming him as biggest mistake for this year. If anyone it was Mou that was 'mistake' at real. He had 3 years and worlds most expensive squad and all money. But he decides to buy Modric for 40mio? And not buying Rb because that Shit arbeloa is just shit? And if Casillas is shit, but Higuain isnt or what so he can play? BS! Mou is neither Real legend. You show some respect to legends you know. All Mou wants is win it fastest way and then leave.Ronaldo was terrible too against dortmund. Why didnt mou stick to this who is shit wont play and bench him? I bet that Real would play better without cr in second leg. Afterall they beated barca this year and ronaldo wasnt playing. How that he keept xabi who was outpaced by bvb in both games? Ronaldo and Mou should leave, no matter how good they were, Real became circus because of their egos and showoffs. Plus Mous excuses after every defeat...Period. I watch real since zidane days and what is going on nowdays is fucked up. Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Oh FFS come off it! No one said CFC were a top top club before Abramovich came here, stop saying that! You were the one that said "Chelsea were mid table before Abramovich came" which simply isn't true!Here are Chelsea's league finishes 5 years before Abramovich came and took over, I can't believe I have to list them and spell it out to you as any decent Chelsea fan would know them (or in fact, a simple Google search will help as well):1998: 4th1999: 3rd2000: 5th2001: 6th2002: 6th2003: 4thDoes that look like mid table to you? Like I said, STOP BEING SO IGNORANT IN SAYING THAT CHELSEA WERE MID TABLE BEFORE ROMAN CAME. You sound like a bloody idiot.Can we get back to intelligently discussing Mourinho now?Once again, you do not read well !FOR YEARS BEFORE ROMAN CAME CHELSEA WERE NOWHERE THE TOP.It means 5 years, 10 years 15 years you dimwit. BlueLyon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,187 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Have a debate properly without insults, it ain't difficult. Beepu, NishC300, Heisenberg and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Once again, you do not read well !FOR YEARS BEFORE ROMAN CAME CHELSEA WERE NOWHERE THE TOP.It means 5 years, 10 years 15 years you dimwit.This is going to be my last post on this matter. This is what you said: May I point out. Jose was very successful at Chelsea. If you had followed Chelsea before his time, the club was hovering in the middle of PL standings, then. Roman came on board invested millions Jose won titles. Just Google it. I rest my case. Not going to argue about it with you anymore as you're clearly deluded and won't admit you're wrong. Mr_President, Johnny Kills, Muzchap and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Jype 6,398 Posted May 7, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted May 7, 2013 I rest my case. Not going to argue about it with you anymore as you're clearly deluded and won't admit you're wrong.Just ignore him. Like good old Ser Bronn once so elegantly stated: didierforever, The only place to be, Mr_President and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 This is going to be my last post on this matter. This is what you said:I rest my case. Not going to argue about it with you anymore as you're clearly deluded and won't admit you're wrong.Exactly BEFORE ROMAN TIME, it says it allLet me simplify it for you for the last time. 5-10-15-20 years before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg 1,824 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 When we are wrong, we must admit it, we aren't geniuses.Just a post. Beepu, The Mak, The Skipper and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,591 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Exactly BEFORE ROMAN TIME, it says it allLet me simplify it for you for the last time. 5-10-15-20 years before. 5 years before Roman, Chelsea where very good. The whole Italian revolution????Ruud Gullit sounds familiar to you???I know I started following Chelsea recently, but at least study up on your history. Muzchap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IkE 267 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 You still need to learn to read better !Once you do that, we won´t have these insults & dribbles here.Now, I hope you know Chelsea were not as good as some of you claimed here.You are on a Chelsea forum, blaming that the team was shit? Are you mad? We can go ballistic here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 You are on a Chelsea forum, blaming that the team was shit? Are you mad? We can go ballistic here.I do not blame anybody. THE TEAM WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO WIN PL, CL BEFORE. It´s a fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.