Jump to content

Luka Modric


DavidEU
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's contrary to UEFA protocol to discuss personal terms with a player before having received authorization from his existing club. I believe the term is "tapping up", players have contracts for a reason. So I doubt they have agreed anything.

Let Madrid have him, we need to strengthen at RW and RB, we have plent of options in midfield, and if we are really to continue playing 4-2-3-1 I feel we would need a player willing to defend a little more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Avb is the coach of tottenham and his first line of business is to launch a 30 mil +_ bid for moutinho. So I think modric will be sold. To expensive for man u and real don't want to pay full price and sahin does not wanna move besides everybody knows modric will be benched a lot. I think 35 mil bid for from chelsea could do it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spurs are on the verge of signing Sigurdsson and are rumored to be after Moutinho too if AVB takes over so Modric looks certain to leave now. Only question remaining is where he's going. The way I see it there are three options: Chelsea, Manchester United and Real Madrid.

If there are no player swaps involved in the deal then a transfer to Real Madrid would be the best option from Tottenham's point of view because they're not even playing in the Champions League ( :lol: ) and wouldn't have to face Modric in any competition whereas selling to another English team would improve their direct rival. Manchester United would most likely be the one to offer him most playing time because their midfield is the worst and also the oldest but I believe they're not willing to spend as much money on him as Tottenham are asking. We would be able to compete with Real Madrid financially but the problem is Levy and that cunt won't sell to us.

I think the only way for us to get Modric now is if their new manager (AVB by the looks of it) wanted one of our players badly, which would suddenly put us in good position in negotiating with them. Sturridge is of course rumored to be in AVB's radar but would we be willing to sacrifice one of our most promising players to get Modric, and even if we were would Spurs still sell Luka to us? Real Madrid and Manchester United don't either have players who Tottenham would want in exchange or the players themselves wouldn't want to go there (Sahin for example). I consider rejects like Diarra to be indifferent, they could be used to sweeten the deal a little but would they really affect Tottenham's decision one way or the other?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if we'll sign Modric, what about Hulk? a RW is far more important now. First get Hulk, and than, if we realy want to spend like crazy people- get Modric too. I still dont think its necessary for next season when we still have Lampard, but whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either bid £35m and get him with cash only, or, knowing how much AVB liked Sturridge, give the £25m + Sturridge.

With Hazard, Modric, a new RW, and RB I cannot see us finishing lower than 2nd in the Prem, as well as making a very deep CL run. Modric can be the key to a title challenging/winning side for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spurs are on the verge of signing Sigurdsson and are rumored to be after Moutinho too if AVB takes over so Modric looks certain to leave now. Only question remaining is where he's going. The way I see it there are three options: Chelsea, Manchester United and Real Madrid.

If there are no player swaps involved in the deal then a transfer to Real Madrid would be the best option from Tottenham's point of view because they're not even playing in the Champions League ( :lol: ) and wouldn't have to face Modric in any competition whereas selling to another English team would improve their direct rival. Manchester United would most likely be the one to offer him most playing time because their midfield is the worst and also the oldest but I believe they're not willing to spend as much money on him as Tottenham are asking. We would be able to compete with Real Madrid financially but the problem is Levy and that cunt won't sell to us.

I think the only way for us to get Modric now is if their new manager (AVB by the looks of it) wanted one of our players badly, which would suddenly put us in good position in negotiating with them. Sturridge is of course rumored to be in AVB's radar but would we be willing to sacrifice one of our most promising players to get Modric, and even if we were would Spurs still sell Luka to us? Real Madrid and Manchester United don't either have players who Tottenham would want in exchange or the players themselves wouldn't want to go there (Sahin for example). I consider rejects like Diarra to be indifferent, they could be used to sweeten the deal a little but would they really affect Tottenham's decision one way or the other?

The only players that AvB liked at Chelsea were Sturridge, Romeu, Bosingwa & Mata...and out of those players, only Sturridge would be available for an inflated price.

I guess we could sacrifice Sturridge as bait for Modric...but the kid has a bright future as a striker in the EPL & I'd hate to see him wearing a Spurs jersey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the Telegraph, Chelsea made an 'informal' inquiry about Luka. Whatever that means..

it means a chelsea representative was hiding in a bush at tottenham and when Luka walked by he whispered at him and offered him 10's of pounds to sweeten he deal. :ph34r:

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As soon as i even saw sahins name there, the article turns invalid. Balague is far more credible than the english version of marca.

Rumors are rumors though, balague is far more trust worthy with what he says though. I recommend you visit his blog if interested.

Balague trustworthy? :lol:

The guy publishes shit like Marca and Daily Mail.

And usually his sources are from some crappy source in Spain. Just recently he was reporting about the Drogba deal to Barcelona....

So yeah very credible. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how about this?

http://www.telegraph...r-interest.html

if true would make me very happy :blue scalf:

That article became BS as soon as I read this:

Roman Abramovich is understood to have made a promise to Modric that he would return for him this year.

How the hell you know this?

Yeah more media made up BS ala Balague!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's contrary to UEFA protocol to discuss personal terms with a player before having received authorization from his existing club. I believe the term is "tapping up", players have contracts for a reason. So I doubt they have agreed anything.

Let Madrid have him, we need to strengthen at RW and RB, we have plent of options in midfield, and if we are really to continue playing 4-2-3-1 I feel we would need a player willing to defend a little more.

Why do we worry about defending all the time? Everybody here wants the CAM, RW, LW even the CF to track back and defend. We have defenders for that.I get the idea of total football but I say we've become cowards talking about defending all the time. Now the media is associating us with the ultra defensive tactic calling it "the chelsea way". We need to change this set of mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You