DDA 9,961 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 15 minutes ago, Pizy said: Other than his work rate, Richarlison doesn’t really do anything that well. Other than throw himself to the ground and act like a bastard. He’s not a prolific goal scorer, he’s not that quick, he’s merely okay with the ball at his feet, he’s not a towering presence in the air. If we signed him would he do a decent job? Probably. But I don’t think he’s good enough to elevate us to title contenders. Raphinha is much more exciting. He’s got an amazing left foot and is extremely exciting in the ball. He’s already one of the best wide players in the PL and should only get better in a stronger team. Raphiniha is almost a carbon copy of Ziyech but a little fatser. I really don't see the point in getting him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,966 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 5 minutes ago, DDA said: Raphiniha is almost a carbon copy of Ziyech but a little fatser. I really don't see the point in getting him. Very, very similar skill set but in a bigger, more athletic frame. Ziyech is so skinny and weak that he always gets pushed around. dimmas and Fernando 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,586 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 I do want Raphinha. Richarlison I'm on the side, but I acknowledge he is good. If we go for both then we will going more of the same route where we play with false strikers like we are doing with Kai. I actually like that because it gives us a good balance and makes us more harder to play against especially in the CL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,067 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 33 minutes ago, Pizy said: Other than his work rate, Richarlison doesn’t really do anything that well. Other than throw himself to the ground and act like a bastard. He’s not a prolific goal scorer, he’s not that quick, he’s merely okay with the ball at his feet, he’s not a towering presence in the air. If we signed him would he do a decent job? Probably. But I don’t think he’s good enough to elevate us to title contenders. Raphinha is much more exciting. He’s got an amazing left foot and is extremely exciting in the ball. He’s already one of the best wide players in the PL and should only get better in a stronger team. I'm just stating which I'd prefer. However, in all fairness, neither will elevate us to title contenders. We should be solely targeting the best players available within our reach, not ones that are doing their bit for relegation sides or fifth choices for the sides we have ambitions of catching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 26 minutes ago, DDA said: Raphiniha is almost a carbon copy of Ziyech but a little fatser. I really don't see the point in getting him. 20 minutes ago, Pizy said: Very, very similar skill set but in a bigger, more athletic frame. Ziyech is so skinny and weak that he always gets pushed around. exactly, is that not the point? Ziyech's problem is that he is frail, weak and slow. He has great technique and those mean whipped in balls are a real danger, he just can't get them in often enough bc he is so easy to bully off the ball and can't beat players. Ideally we would get rid of Timo, Hakim and get all three Sterling, Raphinha and Dembele. All three are completely different in style but are very fast, great on the ball and have output which is more than can be expected of our current crop. Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whats happening 1,624 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 gnabry would be the best option. he's not that expensive either. but it looks like he does not want to come here or our people are not interested in him for some reason. Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clockwork 1,794 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 15 hours ago, ZAPHOD2319 said: It sounds like Boehly stepped in and put this to rest. I don’t think this is true, Matt Law said Lukaku was not wanting to stay, Tuchel would have give him another opportunity if he was committed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZAPHOD2319 4,822 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 10 minutes ago, Clockwork said: I don’t think this is true, Matt Law said Lukaku was not wanting to stay, Tuchel would have give him another opportunity if he was committed. I think Marina would have held out for more from Inter and didn’t care if Lukaku was forced to stay. That could have been terrible for us going forward as far as team building and distractions. At the end of the day, we will probably never know the finer details. Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whats happening 1,624 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 14 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said: I think Marina would have held out for more from Inter and didn’t care if Lukaku was forced to stay. That could have been terrible for us going forward as far as team building and distractions. this makes sense, knowing how she operated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZAPHOD2319 4,822 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 I hope he is given a serious roll and stays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blues Forever 1,232 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 (edited) Barcelona currently doesn’t want to pay €60m for Kounde. They hope to bring down Sevilla’s asking price. There is still no offer either, because the economic levers must be activated first. Edited June 22, 2022 by Blues Forever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chelsea_4_eva 1,182 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 (edited) It seems like Kounde is not top of TTs preferred choice as a CB, the way we are dealing with it atm gives me the vibe of us feeling the price tag is too high (we have not even started negotiating) and if he ends up else where then so be it.. seeing as we have an agreement in place with the player but not pulling the trigger just yet for the buy.. We could also be keeping an eye on the status of TTs preferred targets Edited June 22, 2022 by chelsea_4_eva Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,511 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 Signing both Sterling and Raphinha would cost over 100m. Don't see the club bidding for both with 2 CBs to be signed as well. Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blues Forever 1,232 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 19 minutes ago, Blues Forever said: On another note the fact that teams that haven't won or even challenged for anything in yonks are getting so financially rewarded to the point they can reject £60m (In Leeds/Raphina's case) or over £100m (in WHU/Rice case) to pluck two examples is all ends of wrong for me. Back in 2004 Everton had to sell Wayne Rooney to even get by. Blue Armour 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireBlue 3,285 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 34 minutes ago, Tomo said: On another note the fact that teams that haven't won or even challenged for anything in yonks are getting so financially rewarded to the point they can reject £60m (In Leeds/Raphina's case) or over £100m (in WHU/Rice case) to pluck two examples is all ends of wrong for me. Back in 2004 Everton had to sell Wayne Rooney to even get by. A player is worth what a club values them at why sell for 35 if u can get 65? These clubs know how much money teams have nowadays, as my Leeds fans pals would say pay big or fuck off lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 10 minutes ago, Kong said: A player is worth what a club values them at why sell for 35 if u can get 65? These clubs know how much money teams have nowadays, as my Leeds fans pals would say pay big or fuck off lol. Don't get me wrong I don't blame the club, I blame the system that heavily rewards such underachieving. Leeds shouldn't be in a position where they can turn down £60m for a player and West Ham defiently shouldn't be in a position to demand £150m for one. Clockwork 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireBlue 3,285 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 17 minutes ago, Tomo said: Don't get me wrong I don't blame the club, I blame the system that heavily rewards such underachieving. Leeds shouldn't be in a position where they can turn down £60m for a player and West Ham defiently shouldn't be in a position to demand £150m for one. Your not wrong. But I think it will get worse before it gets better. 60 mill is the new 30 100 mill is the new 50 etc etc, I heard now I don't know if this is facts but this haaland transfer will total 250m in the end. Tomo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clockwork 1,794 Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 19 minutes ago, Tomo said: Don't get me wrong I don't blame the club, I blame the system that heavily rewards such underachieving. Leeds shouldn't be in a position where they can turn down £60m for a player and West Ham defiently shouldn't be in a position to demand £150m for one. EPL tv rights and money distribution is primary responsible, equal distribution of money is terrible and it gives lower club a lot of power. Boycie and Tomo 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! YorkshireBlue 3,285 Posted June 22, 2022 Popular Post! Share Posted June 22, 2022 13 minutes ago, Clockwork said: EPL tv rights and money distribution is primary responsible, equal distribution of money is terrible and it gives lower club a lot of power. Lower clubs? I don't agree that clubs with owners not as rich as some should receive less money from the EPL. You simply can't say because we are Chelsea we are entitled more then say Brighton, don't u ever forget that we once was a lower club, so have some respect and don't turn your nose up at clubs like we used to be. Duppy Conqueror, Boycie, laura90 and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.