Rumoured Maicon

[Zinedine Iniesco 172]

The people with brains will understand No need for me to explain to the incapable to understand.

[Justin_3d 1,140]

The people with brains will understand No need for me to explain to the incapable to understand.

Have you ever heard of get a life????

Apparently not!

[Superblue 6,372]

Might be good for both parties. Despite Maicon not being at the level he was perhaps 2-3 seasons ago (I've always rated him higher than Dani Alves - he has a much better end product), even at soon to be 31 he still has a lot of football left in him and still has an abundance of pace and stamina. These Brazilian full backs never seem to lose this no matter how old they get! (Roberto Carlos, Cafu)

He is certainly an upgrade on Bosingwa, and offers Chelsea the 'attacking' option at full back, whilst Ivanovic provides the more defensively solid option.

You have to believe that if we buy Maicon, Hulk is a must too. The pair would be lethal on the right hand side, given Hulk's preference to cut inside, Maicon would be left with plenty of room to rampage forward.

Such a deal gives Chelsea a very good alternative and option at right back for the next 2-3 years, which gives them time to assess their long term options in that position whether that be from the academy or somebody purchased. For Maicon, he is moving to London and to continue playing at the highest level. There is a good growing Brazilian/Portuguese contingent at the club to help him settle in quickly and he knows given the amount of games the club plays every season, he will play at least 25-30 times a season. This gives him plenty of gametime, without burning him out which will likely prolong his career.

[Shane 2,275]

Paulo Ferreira kept Bale quiet for a couple of games. Does that mean he's better than Maicon? Nope. It's unfair to use one specific game to judge one player.

But has he been the same since that game? I think that was the beginning of the downfall for Maicon.

[Cosmin 2,484]

Can't judge Maicon only by what happened with him in the last period. When Inter won the UCL, he was by far the best right back in Europe, in my opinion.

After that, it wasn't just Maicon's downfall. It was Inter's downfall.

Maybe he just needs to change the air.

I wouldn't say that he is a great transfer, but he might be what we need. The guy deserves a chance.

[JDY 1,290]

I'm surprised no one has mentioned Juliano Belletti when comparing the situation. He was in his 30's and provided great cover both at RB and centre midfield. Maicon is without a doubt a better player at this stage in his career than Juliano was at the same time. The more I think about this deal the more it makes sense, his age is perfect to add valuable experience and it won't stifle Kane/Kalas. The only sticking point for me would be his wages.

If Maicon performs anywhere near as good as Belletti did I'll be pleased (If the deal happens).

[Spike 12,049]

Since Maicon and Debuchy are available for around the same price I would prefer Debuchy. I guess I can't complain about Maicon.

[Stats 7,141]

Might be good for both parties. Despite Maicon not being at the level he was perhaps 2-3 seasons ago (I've always rated him higher than Dani Alves - he has a much better end product), even at soon to be 31 he still has a lot of football left in him and still has an abundance of pace and stamina. These Brazilian full backs never seem to lose this no matter how old they get! (Roberto Carlos, Cafu)

He is certainly an upgrade on Bosingwa, and offers Chelsea the 'attacking' option at full back, whilst Ivanovic provides the more defensively solid option.

You have to believe that if we buy Maicon, Hulk is a must too. The pair would be lethal on the right hand side, given Hulk's preference to cut inside, Maicon would be left with plenty of room to rampage forward.

Such a deal gives Chelsea a very good alternative and option at right back for the next 2-3 years, which gives them time to assess their long term options in that position whether that be from the academy or somebody purchased. For Maicon, he is moving to London and to continue playing at the highest level. There is a good growing Brazilian/Portuguese contingent at the club to help him settle in quickly and he knows given the amount of games the club plays every season, he will play at least 25-30 times a season. This gives him plenty of gametime, without burning him out which will likely prolong his career.

Might be good for both parties. Despite Maicon not being at the level he was perhaps 2-3 seasons ago (I've always rated him higher than Dani Alves - he has a much better end product), even at soon to be 31 he still has a lot of football left in him and still has an abundance of pace and stamina. These Brazilian full backs never seem to lose this no matter how old they get! (Roberto Carlos, Cafu)

He is certainly an upgrade on Bosingwa, and offers Chelsea the 'attacking' option at full back, whilst Ivanovic provides the more defensively solid option.

You have to believe that if we buy Maicon, Hulk is a must too. The pair would be lethal on the right hand side, given Hulk's preference to cut inside, Maicon would be left with plenty of room to rampage forward.

Such a deal gives Chelsea a very good alternative and option at right back for the next 2-3 years, which gives them time to assess their long term options in that position whether that be from the academy or somebody purchased. For Maicon, he is moving to London and to continue playing at the highest level. There is a good growing Brazilian/Portuguese contingent at the club to help him settle in quickly and he knows given the amount of games the club plays every season, he will play at least 25-30 times a season. This gives him plenty of gametime, without burning him out which will likely prolong his career.

Spot on with that mate. The more days that goes on though, the more pessimistic I am about the deal going to happen. Maicon is a quality player, which kind of RB scores the type of goals he did against Milan last season. I agree fully about the attacking/defensive abilities although Maicon is not that bad defensively but going forward his power and pace will offer a lot. Here is his goal against AC Milan if anyone forgot

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Brilliant. From the high's of us being excited by Chelsea signings relatively young AND experienced players to signing 30yo+ players who are past their prime. Deco runs through my mind....

[sLOVEnian Blue 74]

The goal vs Milan was great, but this one is my favourite goal by Maicon ...

[Ollie 4,400]

Fuck that he's way over the hill, Bale proved that a couple years ago. He should be RW than RB anyway but we should look for young or peak players, not players like this. Please do not happen.

[KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607]

Any more news? I really want this deal to happen It makes tons of sense. People who want Debuchy need to snap out of their delusions. He won't come here to be 2nd choice. I prefer Maicon over Debuchy anyway.

Edit: Here is an analysis of Maicon and what he can bring to Chelsea. I agree with the article, Maicon could redsicover his old self and secure that RB spot leaving Ivanovic free for cover.

http://mobile.weaintgotnohistory.com/2012/6/30/3128604/on-why-maicon-would-be-a-good-fit-for-chelsea

[Steve 10,227]

Fuck that he's way over the hill, Bale proved that a couple years ago. He should be RW than RB anyway but we should look for young or peak players, not players like this. Please do not happen.

Agree with this. Don't see what he could bring to the squad. I guess he would be decent cover but not to replace the likes of Ivan and he should be last choice if a younger target becomes available.

[Leif 6,006]

I'd just like to say this to the people who are judging Maicon off of those Tottenham games -

We bought Gary Cahill from a team who is now relegated and conceded an astronomical amount on the league.

Some of our fans and many other teams' fans were pissing themselves laughing as he came from Bolton.

Didn't sound like a glamorous signing, did it?

Oh hold on a moment, my memory has just gone hazy. Who was in the heart of defence when we won the Champions League for the first time in our history?

That transfer doesn't sound so bad now, does it? (I remember people saying we should have spent £40mil on Hummels instead. lololololol)

That reminds me of this situation.

Seriously?

People who judge players from a game or two, where they're from, their age and what's happened in the past are both ignorant and, in a sense, even pessimistic.

Why don't the same people actually watch more like around 10-20 full games of his, judge him off his current talent and not his previous/'better' talent when he was younger, and try to understand what he'd be bringing to our team?

There's more to football than statistics. Only watching a few games of someone is just ludicrous too.

I always come off as a dick head who wants to be a know-it-all, and honestly, it's because of situations like this.

In a sort of reverse situation, when everyone was gargling all over van Der Wiel's nuts because they just listened to the media and other people without researching, learning and thinking for themselves, I would just keep on preaching about how bad he actually is.

Yet somehow, people who had only seen 2 games of his and a few Youtube high/low-lights had the nerve to even debate a situation/player that they knew nothing about.

Then, EURO 2012 comes around, and everyone sees how awful he actually is. He would downgrade our team.

Judge a player for what he actually is from your own experience; not what others say they think he is. Otherwise, don't comment on the subject in such a way.

I'm not saying to listen to my thoughts or opinions, but at least listen to other people on the forum who actually know football in-depth and know players past just 90 minutes when they're on a good/bad day.

In my opinion, Maicon is an upgrade on Bosingwa.

Maicon would be a back-up and sometimes rotation option.

If Maicon were to stay at Inter and they were in the Champions League next season and we were drawn against him, most of the forum here would be highlighting him as their danger man for the match.

I'll end this rant now.

I just hate it when so many of these people don't think for themselves, and only echo what others and the media says.

There's no need to spunk millions on a young, hungry right-back who'd demand a starting role and who we don't need (we need back-up, not a starter) over an older, more experienced, ex-one of the best in the world, Champions League winning right-back who'd be willing to play a lesser part without fuss.

P.S. - For those who have only seen those few games of Debuchy at Euro 2012 and nothing more, yes, he is as good as he looks. No, he isn't the correct option for us.

Bring on the abuse biatchez.

[chrismada9 1,948]

I'd just like to say this to the people who are judging Maicon off of those Tottenham games -

We bought Gary Cahill from a team who is now relegated and conceded an astronomical amount on the league.

Some of our fans and many other teams' fans were pissing themselves laughing as he came from Bolton.

Didn't sound like a glamorous signing, did it?

Oh hold on a moment, my memory has just gone hazy. Who was in the heart of defence when we won the Champions League for the first time in our history?

That transfer doesn't sound so bad now, does it? (I remember people saying we should have spent £40mil on Hummels instead. lololololol)

That reminds me of this situation.

Seriously?

People who judge players from a game or two, where they're from, their age and what's happened in the past are both ignorant and, in a sense, even pessimistic.

Why don't the same people actually watch more like around 10-20 full games of his, judge him off his current talent and not his previous/'better' talent when he was younger, and try to understand what he'd be bringing to our team?

There's more to football than statistics. Only watching a few games of someone is just ludicrous too.

I always come off as a dick head who wants to be a know-it-all, and honestly, it's because of situations like this.

In a sort of reverse situation, when everyone was gargling all over van Der Wiel's nuts because they just listened to the media and other people without researching, learning and thinking for themselves, I would just keep on preaching about how bad he actually is.

Yet somehow, people who had only seen 2 games of his and a few Youtube high/low-lights had the nerve to even debate a situation/player that they knew nothing about.

Then, EURO 2012 comes around, and everyone sees how awful he actually is. He would downgrade our team.

Judge a player for what he actually is from your own experience; not what others say they think he is. Otherwise, don't comment on the subject in such a way.

I'm not saying to listen to my thoughts or opinions, but at least listen to other people on the forum who actually know football in-depth and know players past just 90 minutes when they're on a good/bad day.

In my opinion, Maicon is an upgrade on Bosingwa.

Maicon would be a back-up and sometimes rotation option.

If Maicon were to stay at Inter and they were in the Champions League next season and we were drawn against him, most of the forum here would be highlighting him as their danger man for the match.

I'll end this rant now.

I just hate it when so many of these people don't think for themselves, and only echo what others the media says.

There's no need to spunk millions on a young, hungry right-back who'd demand a starting role and who we don't need (we need back-up, not a starter) over an older, more experienced, ex-one of the best in the world, Champions League winning right-back who'd be willing to play a lesser part without fuss.

P.S. - For those who have only seen those few games of Debuchy at Euro 2012 and nothing more, yes, he is as good as he looks. No, he isn't the correct option for us.

Bring on the abuse biatchez.

Great post dude!

You can also add, that when we signed Belletti at 30 something, he proved so useful to us, scoring amazing long-range goals and becoming a Chelsea hero in his own right!