Matthew Harding Stand
Opinions and analysis on tactics, players and off the field issues.
Subforums
-
Chelsea Transfers (15,150 visits to this link)
-
- 17.2k
- posts
-
- 142.1k
- posts
5,218 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 135 views
-
-
- 21 replies
- 2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 148 views
-
- 0 replies
- 134 views
-
- 0 replies
- 128 views
-
- 0 replies
- 130 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 14 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 11 replies
- 939 views
-
- 28 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 65 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 137 views
-
- 25 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 37 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 24 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 259 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 146 views
-
- 3 replies
- 12.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 126 views
-
0 members are here!
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Latest Posts
-
The money was a no brainier, but getting the money and spending it are two different things, I would argue selling mount and Havertz hasn’t put us in a better position than if we hadn’t sold them, mount could have played lw and saved us a shit ton on mudryk, when ever we chose to sell mount he would have still been pure profit, same with Gallagher, him and caicedo were a better partnership than him and Enzo, personally for me Enzo is up there with mudryk of wastes of money -
Well I personally think, the club did not have a fixed position for Havertz and I think the idea was to have another CF here, however Jackson looked really good in pre-season and start of season, so they kind of relied on him. He was half the price we sold for Havertz and if a team is willing to pay that much for a player who doesn't really fit in your team or has no tailor-made position, the money was too good to turn down. Similar to Mount. We ideally did not want him to go to another EnglishBy Stats
-
I call bs on this, Liverpool seem To have no problem scoring goals and there number 9 option is what Darwin?
-
So if that’s your opinion and I’m not here to say it’s wrong or right, was there any real need to sell Havertz to buy Jackson, in fact for most of our players sold have we done anything with that money except caicedo and palmer I would argue we’re worth it, can’t think of any other player we have signed I would have over the team that won the champions league actually maybe kova because he was absolutely shite today
-
Kai has not be nothing special for them. They need a better strike to win the league in the futureBy Mário César
-
I disagree. Havertz rarely scores more than one goal in a game. I feel all the flaws you said about Jackson is literally the same for Havertz. Havertz has missed loads of sitters this season himself. Just look at the United game in the FA Cup (excluding the penalty) as well as the Newcastle game. He missed open goal today also. I am mot saying Jackson does not miss sitters but they both are equally as bad when it comes to missing chances. Arsenal win more games because they have a better defence
By Stats
-
Kai still scored, fluff or not u can’t take that away from him
-
-
He fumbled up that chance and got lucky to be honest. And saying that when we had players like Silva, Kante, Chilly, even Giroud, who had more impact on that CL than Kai.
By Simon1991
-
Yeah the money was good, but money is worthless when u don’t reinvest it, so we got 75m and bought the likes of mudryk so why bother?
-
He's not played in that position for 5 years, and most teams don't play with a classic number 10 anymore anyway. Yeah, move on, he's really a mid player, im glad we got 75m for that donkey lover.
By Simon1991
-
I don’t care if they celebrate against us or not, I also remember he won us a champions league so who gives a fuck what he does now he doesn’t play here
-
-
Player Threads
