The English Football Thread

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

Normally I feel bad for players getting injured but I have to admit I enjoy watching ManScum's getting hurt. Don't judge me.

[Term-X 7,891]

TX, why you are so insecure about Mourinho's legacy? I mean he is one of the very best managers on this planet and even my granny knows it. No matter how many trophies Mancini won he is still nowhere near Mourinho's level.

It's all about it being in conjunction with 'our' history, and how we compare/Roman's Chelsea (title haul) with City's, a club who will be rightfully compared to us due to the respective owners (club model). It also lessens Jose's achievements here, it shows 'on the surface' (think how future generations will perceive it) as any club can come along and splash the cash and that Mourinho & Mancini's 'back to back title' reigns were equal in that sense.

[The only place to be 11,313]

It's all about it being in conjunction with 'our' history, and how we compare/Roman's Chelsea (title haul) with City's, a club who will be rightfully compared to us due to the respective owners (club model). It also lessens Jose's achievements here, it shows 'on the surface' (think how future generations will perceive it) as any club can come along and splash the cash and that Mourinho & Mancini's 'back to back title' reigns were equal in that sense.

Let's just ignore the preposterous claims about Mourinho's legacy that you're making.

Do you not worry about the manager situation that some of the fans in this thread have commented on? Our past achievements are there and no proper Chelsea fan thinks they'll be diminished or tarnished by anything City do.

But what about our future?

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

It's all about it being in conjunction with 'our' history, and how we compare/Roman's Chelsea (title haul) with City's, a club who will be rightfully compared to us due to the respective owners (club model). It also lessens Jose's achievements here, it shows 'on the surface' (think how future generations will perceive it) as any club can come along and splash the cash and that Mourinho & Mancini's 'back to back title' reigns were equal in that sense.

No it won't lessen anything Mourinho has achieved.

Jose's Chelsea swept the league with a bang, we were almost invincible and we won the league with shit loads of points advantage. Last season Citeh won it by goal difference despite other teams were shit ffs.

[1chelsea 864]

good goal

[1chelsea 864]

who is going to win this

[CHOULO19 24,332]

I want City to win it just to see the look on Fergie's face

[Yeboii 1,844]

Man U players have dived 3 times since ive turned on the game, i have watched for 5 minutes! 3 dives in 5 minutes!

[1chelsea 864]

the seem all city

[CHOULO19 24,332]

LMAO @ Mancini's reaction

[Kojo 4,676]

Barry has been playing well.

[1chelsea 864]

that is wrong from the ref

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

WTF?! THE REF IS A FUCKING RETARD. You don't need to help Manscum that obvious.

[The Mak 4,459]

It's all about it being in conjunction with 'our' history, and how we compare/Roman's Chelsea (title haul) with City's, a club who will be rightfully compared to us due to the respective owners (club model). It also lessens Jose's achievements here, it shows 'on the surface' (think how future generations will perceive it) as any club can come along and splash the cash and that Mourinho & Mancini's 'back to back title' reigns were equal in that sense.

How? Just, how exactly?

José stormed the league in his first season and Mancini eventually got it on his third. It took us just 2 years after our takeover to win the league, it took City 4. Also, how much did each club and manager spend since their take over? I'd imagine City have spent much more.

There is no comparrison.

[1chelsea 864]

tom cruise watching match live

[Strike 6,979]

I don't get this logic, it makes no sense.

So it will keep Mancini the job?, if he wins the title and wins a few more other trophies, what's the logic in that, he's still winning things for City if he's keeping the job so i really don't understand how this escapes the point in the first place.

I don't get you? maybe you can explain your post? the whole point is that there are No other vacancies so that we can get either of Pep or Jose.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Zabaletta scores!

[1chelsea 864]

2:2