Styles 9,790 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 It's a mistake to think strikers simply finish chances which is where I think your confusion comes from. They don't. When Drogba wasn't scoring in his first couple of seasons with us, he was creating chances for players around him. Watch the home leg against Bayern Munich in 2005 for a perfect example of this.What we need is a striker who makes runs that draw defenders away from the player on the ball, to create space and holes for us to exploit and simply wrong-foot defenders. We need someone who just keeps defenders honest which neither Ba or Torres seems capable of. It's amazing that we're where we are right now and unsurprising that we struggled to score in certain games.Yup, it's taken the players a lot of balls, grit and determination to overcome such obvious shortcomings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Henrique 9,133 Posted March 30, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted March 30, 2014 For me, Mourinho failed to create a team. We dont have a pattern, we dont know whats our playing style, and at the end of the day Mourinho made some moves because, after all, he believed the team could win the league in a ugly way. I really dont know how he can be happy with Ivanovic. A full back duties is more than defending. Ivanovic have almost zero attacking skills. Yesterday there was a moment when he was free to cross, had all the time in the world to make an assist, but his "cross" was a more of an long shoot than a cross.We have Azi playing as a LB, he is doing really well, but guess what, he is a RB, he is better than Ivanovic, and I dont know how Cole can do worst as a LB, than Ivanovic is doing as a RB.We dont know how our midfield look like. Matic-Ramires-Willian-Oscar-Hazard; Matic, Luiz, Ramires, Willian, Hazard; Matic, Luiz, Lampard, Schurle, Hazard; Matic, Lampard, Ramires, Oscar, Hazard. Some people might think it means Mourinho have a dynamic midfield, but its the opposite.Despite all those changes, we dont a have a pattern, we dont have a playing style, the team usually waste 45 minutes with a slow start, and Mourinho end up moaning about the 3 chances the team missed during the match...but in football usually you have to create many chances to score one goal, if teams like Barcelona or Bayern scored in every opportunity they create, they would be scoring 20 goals in a match. Limited teams need to score, or "kill the game", with only 2 or 3 opportunities, because its the only way they know to victory.When the team barely create, every single chance missed seems a huge deal. Yesterday in the 2nd half, there was only 1 great chance (the one Hazard missed), now its easy to say Hazard doesnt have the balls to "kill the game" when he has to, or its even more easy to blame Torres, but for me, one single chance in 45 minutes against Crystal Palace is not enough for a team fighting for the league. duo11bluecl, xPetrCechx, Styles and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodIsBlue 291 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 You guys have seriously never seen Jose sub in a second striker? The decision making of the players were poor. That formation should have scored and won the game. The decision making was poor and it got poorer once we conceded. Defenders were turning their backs to CP players; players especially Hazard were trying to dribbling infront of 5 men instead of dumping it over to Torres+Ba; we lost so many 50/50s; gambled with poor shots from distance as the clock ran down; and last but not least the elephants in the room Torres and Ba. We have thrived off standout performances from players like Hazard, Azpi, Terry, Cech and now Matic so when too many of them have an off day the whole team will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles 9,790 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 For me, Mourinho failed to create a team. We dont have a pattern, we dont know whats our playing style, and at the end of the day Mourinho made some moves because, after all, he believed the team could win the league in a ugly way. I really dont know how he can be happy with Ivanovic. A full back duties is more than defending. Ivanovic have almost zero attacking skills. Yesterday there was a moment when he was free to cross, had all the time in the world to make an assist, but his "cross" was a more of an long shoot than a cross.We have Azi playing as a LB, he is doing really well, but guess what, he is a RB, he is better than Ivanovic, and I dont know how Cole can do worst as a LB, than Ivanovic is doing as a RB.We dont know how our midfield look like. Matic-Ramires-Willian-Oscar-Hazard; Matic, Luiz, Ramires, Willian, Hazard; Matic, Luiz, Lampard, Schurle, Hazard; Matic, Lampard, Ramires, Oscar, Hazard. Some people might think it means Mourinho have a dynamic midfield, but its the opposite.Despite all those changes, we dont a have a pattern, we dont have a playing style, the team usually waste 45 minutes with a slow start, and Mourinho end up moaning about the 3 chances the team missed during the match...but in football usually you have to create many chances to score one goal, if teams like Barcelona or Bayern scored in every opportunity they create, they would be scoring 20 goals in a match. Limited teams need to score, or "kill the game", with only 2 or 3 opportunities, because its the only way they know to victory.When the team barely create, every single chance missed seems a huge deal. Yesterday in the 2nd half, there was only 1 great chance (the one Hazard missed), now its easy to say Hazard doesnt have the balls to "kill the game" when he has to, or its even more easy to blame Torres, but for me, one single chance in 45 minutes against Crystal Palace is not enough for a team fighting for the league. And that only came about via a deflection. Henrique 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╫rue Blue 47 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Since Mourinho returned, we have a lot of people in this forum with hypercritical views towards our own players. The reason why is very simple: Mourinho is a GOD, so if you get bad results, its the players fault. We already have some people saying Liverpool, Arsenal and Borussia have better squads, and that speaks loud.After Villa defeat, I thought we played well, and I had positive opinions about that game, but yesterday it was a different history. Mourinho GOT IT WRONG, from the beginning to finish. His selection was awful, and please, dont tell me it was the same team that played against Arsenal. Crystal palace is a differet team, with a different approach. Matic-Luiz-Lampard-Hazard-SchurleSomeone expected a different game with this kind of midfield? He said we failed to convert our opportunities in the 1st half. Bullshit. I think we created one single chance in the first 45 minutes, the one that Schurle missed. What I have to say about his subs? Can anyone please tell me exactly what he was thinking with his 4-1-3-2 formation? Ba+Torres upfront? All he got was letting Crystal Palace create 5 chances to score the 2nd goal.But, at the end of the day, the reason is lack of balls, and no surprise, we have some people buying that excuse. yes, the match performance is very disapointingbut what make it worse for me, is what mourinho said at post match interviewhe just said teams ONLY didnt have spirit, this is very very disapointing because this indicated he BLIND WHAT HE MISSING from his teamtheres isnt coincidence, why our team struggling over and over against small pub teamhe still didnt realise, there is something more to be concern and improve than just our spiritand he even mention our ONLY single chance in 1st half by saying " yeah the match is hard, but we have some good chance ... in first half we didnt take"really ? Henrique 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo11bluecl 207 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 I've seen a few Atletico games and they are what Mourinho is building us towards which is a very hardworking and efficient team. I think their tactics work better in Spain where there is a culture of teams trying to play and being open. We don't have that luxury in this league; teams are more than content to stick 11 men behind the ball even at home. We need more in our locker than pressing and counter-attacking.The thing is sometime identity just can't be changed. For example imagine Barcelona playing counter attacking defensive football, just never going to happen no matter who the manager is. Imagine Real Madrid plays tiki taka, just doesn't happen. I think our identity is that we have and always will be a defensive team with great counter attacking, the days of us dominating entire match will just never come unless Pep becomes our manager and we start selling the likes of Mikel...etc for good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo11bluecl 207 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 You guys have seriously never seen Jose sub in a second striker? The decision making of the players were poor. That formation should have scored and won the game. The decision making was poor and it got poorer once we conceded. Defenders were turning their backs to CP players; players especially Hazard were trying to dribbling infront of 5 men instead of dumping it over to Torres+Ba; we lost so many 50/50s; gambled with poor shots from distance as the clock ran down; and last but not least the elephants in the room Torres and Ba. We have thrived off standout performances from players like Hazard, Azpi, Terry, Cech and now Matic so when too many of them have an off day the whole team will. It doesn't matter if you put your best team out, you don't win if you don't have the right tactic. No one is questioning Jose's play selection or sub, all of that are fine but rather the TACTIC THAT HE IMPLEMENTED. And for the bold bit isn't that for all the teams?For me, Mourinho failed to create a team. We dont have a pattern, we dont know whats our playing style, and at the end of the day Mourinho made some moves because, after all, he believed the team could win the league in a ugly way. I really dont know how he can be happy with Ivanovic. A full back duties is more than defending. Ivanovic have almost zero attacking skills. Yesterday there was a moment when he was free to cross, had all the time in the world to make an assist, but his "cross" was a more of an long shoot than a cross.We have Azi playing as a LB, he is doing really well, but guess what, he is a RB, he is better than Ivanovic, and I dont know how Cole can do worst as a LB, than Ivanovic is doing as a RB.We dont know how our midfield look like. Matic-Ramires-Willian-Oscar-Hazard; Matic, Luiz, Ramires, Willian, Hazard; Matic, Luiz, Lampard, Schurle, Hazard; Matic, Lampard, Ramires, Oscar, Hazard. Some people might think it means Mourinho have a dynamic midfield, but its the opposite.Despite all those changes, we dont a have a pattern, we dont have a playing style, the team usually waste 45 minutes with a slow start, and Mourinho end up moaning about the 3 chances the team missed during the match...but in football usually you have to create many chances to score one goal, if teams like Barcelona or Bayern scored in every opportunity they create, they would be scoring 20 goals in a match. Limited teams need to score, or "kill the game", with only 2 or 3 opportunities, because its the only way they know to victory.When the team barely create, every single chance missed seems a huge deal. Yesterday in the 2nd half, there was only 1 great chance (the one Hazard missed), now its easy to say Hazard doesnt have the balls to "kill the game" when he has to, or its even more easy to blame Torres, but for me, one single chance in 45 minutes against Crystal Palace is not enough for a team fighting for the league. You could win the league in an ugly way, it been proven before by Jose himself. I think the reason Dave is playing LB started after that Cole party scandal in Dec, Jose doesn't have anyone else to rely on so he just started to drop Cole to make a point(which is fine for me). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 We'll be scary in Mourinho's second season, as usual with him. The only place to be and Blue-in-me-Veins 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo11bluecl 207 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 We'll be scary in Mourinho's second season, as usual with him.Hope so, actually it is an expectation not hope. We really just HAVE TO BE or it would be consider a failure, that is how high the expectation is at this club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrus 422 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 he just said teams ONLY didnt have spirit, this is very very disapointing because this indicated he BLIND WHAT HE MISSING from his teamSure, he should be talking in the PC about each and every problem the team has and the ways he thinks we should solve them - for anyone interested to hear.Sure he is paid to do that, not to work on this problems.Really. Really.I dare anyone to come out and say that any of the players came out there yesterday wanting to win and giving everything they could to get 3 points. And then let's talk tactics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 The tactical outclassing of Pellegrini at the Etihad seems like a lifetime ago in this thread. duren batu, BloodIsBlue, bababoom and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodIsBlue 291 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 I dare anyone to come out and say that any of the players came out there yesterday wanting to win and giving everything they could to get 3 points. And then let's talk tactics....the nail on the head right there. You can't just implement effective tactics while your players are playing like ballerinas and expect to dominate. Barbara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Polo7 3,496 Posted March 30, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted March 30, 2014 Can you imagine if we had David Moyes instead? Our fans are so fucking fickle its unbelievable. duren batu, The only place to be, bababoom and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╫rue Blue 47 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Sure, he should be talking in the PC about each and every problem the team has and the ways he thinks we should solve them - for anyone interested to hear.Sure he is paid to do that, not to work on this problems.Really. Really.I dare anyone to come out and say that any of the players came out there yesterday wanting to win and giving everything they could to get 3 points. And then let's talk tactics.i'am actually fine with his player selection against CP, maybe that is almost the best line upbut Mourinho hardly to make progress in the game when we just cant counter attack the oppositionwhen the oppositon waiting and allowed us to had more ball / possesion, to iniate the attack.Almost nothing improvement in such aspect like attacking player movement, the combination play, intelligent decision making in final thirdAnd he seem doesnt realise it yet, what make us often struggling to CREATE chance against small pub team, there is more than just lacking motivation The Chels 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo11bluecl 207 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Can you imagine if we had David Moyes instead? Our fans are so fucking fickle its unbelievable. OMG no one, I REPEAT NO FUCKING ONE is doubting Jose or his ability, we are simply SHOWING his FLOWS and analyses what he is doing wrong. Just because you are not kissing his ass to death doesn't mean you are not appreciating him. By the same argument you could also says can you imagine if we have got Klopp/Ancelotti/Pep instead? We would probably be up there with City and Liverpool in goal scoring chart or at least dominating matches with the ball and good passing. Henrique 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 If Pep was hired, the team would be passing the ball even after the final whistle. That's all, more possession, but....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 OMG no one, I REPEAT NO FUCKING ONE is doubting Jose or his ability, we are simply SHOWING his FLOWS and analyses what he is doing wrong. Just because you are not kissing his ass to death doesn't mean you are not appreciating him. By the same argument you could also says can you imagine if we have got Klopp/Ancelotti/Pep instead? We would probably be up there with City and Liverpool in goal scoring chart or at least dominating matches with the ball and good passing.I do find it mildly amusing seeing people oh here showing his FLAWS ,, (correct spelling ) and analysing his mistakes , We can all have our opinions but please.. IF YOU are this good where will your next job be? Muzchap and Mohammed Seif 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,448 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Not at all true. Taking only the Palace game - Most of Chelsea's shots were from 35 yards when the team couldn't find a way through whereas Palace had a lot of dangerous attacksOnly dangerous Chelsea attack was Azpi cross to Schurrle that somehow stayed outI was specifically talking about the number of chances...The quality of our chances was poor due to bad decision making on the counter, which was what I was trying to imply in post..;Crystal palace 1 goal from 14 attempts, and Chelsea 0 from 21 attemptsEDIT: Story of our season, against bottom half/relegation teams Muzchap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,573 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 For me, Mourinho failed to create a team. We dont have a pattern, we dont know whats our playing style, and at the end of the day Mourinho made some moves because, after all, he believed the team could win the league in a ugly way. I really dont know how he can be happy with Ivanovic. A full back duties is more than defending. Ivanovic have almost zero attacking skills. Yesterday there was a moment when he was free to cross, had all the time in the world to make an assist, but his "cross" was a more of an long shoot than a cross.We have Azi playing as a LB, he is doing really well, but guess what, he is a RB, he is better than Ivanovic, and I dont know how Cole can do worst as a LB, than Ivanovic is doing as a RB.We dont know how our midfield look like. Matic-Ramires-Willian-Oscar-Hazard; Matic, Luiz, Ramires, Willian, Hazard; Matic, Luiz, Lampard, Schurle, Hazard; Matic, Lampard, Ramires, Oscar, Hazard. Some people might think it means Mourinho have a dynamic midfield, but its the opposite.Despite all those changes, we dont a have a pattern, we dont have a playing style, the team usually waste 45 minutes with a slow start, and Mourinho end up moaning about the 3 chances the team missed during the match...but in football usually you have to create many chances to score one goal, if teams like Barcelona or Bayern scored in every opportunity they create, they would be scoring 20 goals in a match. Limited teams need to score, or "kill the game", with only 2 or 3 opportunities, because its the only way they know to victory.When the team barely create, every single chance missed seems a huge deal. Yesterday in the 2nd half, there was only 1 great chance (the one Hazard missed), now its easy to say Hazard doesnt have the balls to "kill the game" when he has to, or its even more easy to blame Torres, but for me, one single chance in 45 minutes against Crystal Palace is not enough for a team fighting for the league. Henrique 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vybz Kartel 1,613 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Ultimately the blame lies at his feet just like the praise does. We have always struggled this season against small teams and a coach of his calibre shld hv solved the problem. Even Rodgers who is a lesser coach found a way to go around his weak defence, simply set up to out score the opponent and its worked a treat. Mou has to take blame for our failures IMO especially against bottom sides just as he takes praise for our victories over the Top 4 duo11bluecl and ╫rue Blue 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.