Jump to content

The Mourinho Thread


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

so jose should play according to what viewers want to see,, hmm... next i will hear is, jose sucked all the fun out of PL by finishing the PL so early. look at city and how wonderfully they won their title.. JOGA BONITO!!!

we have been utter crap for 4 months. dont mind that we are unbeaten for 4 months in PL!!!! :lol: :lol:

what makes you think that jose gives a crap about what people think about his philosophy? or that he is looking to change people's opinions? i thought his comments were pretty straight forward as to what he thinks is the main priority when he makes his team go out on the field.

Next i will hear is, jose sucked all the fun out of PL by finishing the PL so early. You said it all thank you
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno about you guys but if I spent more time complaining about how my team played than actually supporting and celebrating their victories Id probably consider supporting another team that fulfilled my "BARCELONA ATTACKING FOOTBALL CAN LOSE BUT CANT PLAY DEFENCE" needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/4/28/8510175/mikel-scores-his-greatest-ever-goal

did not know where to put this so i ll just put in here so that atleast the most negative of the posters have something to smile about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get how anyone but Jose can win Manager of the Year.

Let's start with that, for 2 seasons, Chelsea were top for majority of that time, close to 300 days. Result = 0 manager of the month awards.

Man City during those 2 seasons were leaders for 15 days + 9 days tied at the top = 3 manager of the month awards for Pellegrini.

So if you cannot give MoTM award for someone who was at the top for majority of his time being the manager you have to give him Year award, right ?

When I see Southampton, fine, but they're 7th now comparing with being 8th last season. Hardly an upgrade, they're still outside of Europe now. Even if they lost many players, I think everyone imagined that they're so stable now with their budget and Academy players, that safe standing in the middle of the table will be theirs. Probably they overachieved but one thing is overachieving while being doomed for mid table and another coping with being doomed for first position - and responding with being at the top for whole season.

At the end Southampton made minimal progress while Chelsea made far bigger in my opinion.

Others like Monk and Pearson are out of contention. Monk only added bigger insurance for safe standing while Pearson probably survived with club which got promotion with over 100 points and are above only ONE last season Premier League team.

Pardew ensured survival for 2 teams. But I can't consider this as enourmous achievement since he had to be above only ONE last season Premier League team (other than Sunderland, above Burnley, who have budget good for Eredivisie and QPR who couldn't score away for majority of the season).

So all in all it shouldn't be contention at all. Others don't compare with being at the top for around 300 days and still waiting for first proper recognition. Jose is only one winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if that's sincere, should be the most brave post i've seen here, it's not always easy to stop arguing and concede that the other person is right ( even when things are as obvious ) in a debate you've been holding for months.

Gotta give him credit if he means it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...