Jump to content

The Next Manager?


 Share

Recommended Posts

Frank Lampard could make sensational return as Chelsea manager | @Alex_Crook #CFC


Lampard a tentative option at this stage but comes into the equation if top targets Nagelsmann and Enrique do not want to take over until the summer. Not sure how long Bruno ideally wants to be there due to attachment to Potter. Lamps visit last night was pre-planned #CFC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, xPetrCechx said:

Why not Pochettino?

If he managed to take suprs to the CL final, he can win some trophies with us 🙂

I think he and Nagelsmann are similar in lots of ways, I think either would be OK but Nagelsmann is sort of flavour of the month in some ways. I think any of Enrique, Nagelsmann or Poch would be a big upgrade on Potter.

I have the general feeling that the style of football Pep has advocated for is overall the one that works the best over the long run, rather than the ultra high pressing approach which to me seems to bring short to medium term success only, so I'd probably go with Enrique. Pep (and now probably Arteta) have just won so many titles playing this way that it just feels like they've won the debate, and we should commit to it for the long term and make it work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chelsea manager latest:

- Enrique flies to London  

- Club also in contact with Nagelsmann

- Chelsea committed to speaking to up to 5 candidates (inc Poch) to establish frontrunner

- Caretaker to end of season not ruled out - Lampard one idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lamps until the end of the season? Man, idk. 

If we suddenly flip a switch and look really good for the rest of the way I’d be terrified that the owners would give him the job permanently again which would be a massive mistake.

Also, you know Mount would walk back into the team. He’d probably drop Felix who has been the fulcrum and key to our attacking link between midfield and forward line since he’s been here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, xPetrCechx said:

He's not a bad idea till the end of the season... better than Bruno imo.

It's not going to happen, we are looking to bring someone in now. It doesn't make any sense, having JN or Enrique starts the process so things are well underway for the new season. They can see the players for the remaining games and make their own take and help with the deadwood shift that is required to what they see.

Interim now means more delay of ideas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Lampard accepts coming in as a caretaker, then he is all but giving up on his managerial career. 

He might see it as an opportunity, but there is no way someone so young agrees to this if he believes that he's got a future as a manager.

Edited by Cosmin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Get our guy now 

From what I understand, the interim solution only comes into play if "our guy" is not willing to come in immediately.

It is not that bad of a strategy to secure the new manager and finish off the season having an interim in charge. 

It takes off a lot of weight from the new manager's shoulders. 

This strategy has worked quite well for us back in 2016, when Conte arrived after Hiddink took care of the end of that 2015-2016 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cosmin said:

From what I understand, the interim solution only comes into play if "our guy" is not willing to come in immediately.

It is not that bad of a strategy to secure the new manager and finish off the season having an interim in charge. 

It takes off a lot of weight from the new manager's shoulders. 

This strategy has worked quite well for us back in 2016, when Conte arrived after Hiddink took care of the end of that 2015-2016 season.

I guess. But I’d rather not have the interim be Frank if we must have one. Get someone in with no emotional ties to the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Cosmin said:

From what I understand, the interim solution only comes into play if "our guy" is not willing to come in immediately.

It is not that bad of a strategy to secure the new manager and finish off the season having an interim in charge. 

It takes off a lot of weight from the new manager's shoulders. 

This strategy has worked quite well for us back in 2016, when Conte arrived after Hiddink took care of the end of that 2015-2016 season.

Valuable time lost imo. Takes managers months to really learn the squad, we hear it from managers all the time. If we delay until summer, our new manager doesn't know the squad properly until Christmas, probably.

I think there is not so much between the people available that we would wait until summer, one of them will be ready to go immediately and that will be a key screening question in interviews.

Also, like all big clubs we tend to run pretty shitty preseasons from a prep perspective, as commercials are the main focus. This is time they can use for prep before preseason, so that by the time next PL campaign starts our players have been drilled well.

Edited by Mhsc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lamps was sacked here and we instantly improved. He was sacked at Everton and they instantly improved.

He just isn’t a PL manager at this point in his early managerial career. He needs to go back down to the Championship for a few seasons, build up his reputation again, and then perhaps get another PL job at a small club. 

Having seen our board make some super silly managerial decisions over the past year I don’t even want there to be a 1% chance that they “fall in love” with Frank and give him the job permanently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pros of each candidate so far:

Poch-Knows the league,has a good record of developing young talent.safest  pick of the candidates due to only one whose spent any time coaching in England.aside from front 3 our squad has more talent than he’s coached before.despite the press saying we are a club with big ego’s etc.. in our squad.we don’t,we haven’t since the likes of Costa,Courtois and before them even more so with Drogba,Ballack,Lampard,JT etc..he’s coached players with even bigger ego’s than the latter.he’s only won trophies with PSG and although not the one they really want,but same is true with Pep at Man City.he coached Tottenham with tightarse Levy to massively overachieve.

Enrique-managed with success at a big club,system suits our current squad ( if our front 3 can score more) despite being at Barcelona his system is quite different to Pep’s.history of over tinkering in past but hopefully learnt from having more success when he didnt. I don’t really consider what his record as international coach was…nobody would put Southgate as a top 5 coach in the world despite his top 3 record at international level.

Nagelsmann: tactically astute,has coached at a big club,atleast when media calls our head coach young they would be accurate rather than keep hearing it about a 47year old. Inexperience only a concern to me in regard to of English football,but same applies to all candidates but Poch.

i don’t see waiting till the summer as a way of getting much more options really..is only Carlo who might be available that is good enough to add to the mix.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need Nagelsman, he can develope young talanted players! Enrique didnt made anything impressive bar the Barcelona prime MSN time with Iniesta.. 

Even i can coach that team.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You