Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Another winger who is awesome once in a while but extremely disappointing more often than not. In other words, the Chelsea Special.

The only wide attacker we should be thinking about is Chiesa next summer. And he’s probably impossible.

Need a midfielder. Our whole system under Tuchel was born due to the limitations of our midfielders. Bissouma ran circles around them tonight. 
 

Not getting Tchouameni last summer is looking more and more ridiculous by the day. He signs for another club we may as well wear a red nose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Pizy said:

Part of me doubts that the club will go all out in January for a super expensive, long term starter LB like Theo. He’s the sort of player who you get when you don’t have a first choice LB as he’s far too good to be a rotation option. Chilly will come back eventually and if he’s able to return to his top class level then what would we do if we had he AND Theo on our books?

This is why Digne or Dest make more sense. They are both really solid but can coexist and still be reasonably happy with big competition for their place.

Theo is far better than Chilwell. Makes no sense to not make the move. Citeh have multiple starting level fullbacks.

I refuse to settle. Settling is what gets us in positions like we are now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Vesper said:

Theo is far better than Chilwell. Makes no sense to not make the move. Citeh have multiple starting level fullbacks.

I refuse to settle. Settling is what gets us in positions like we are now.

Yes, I agree. Time to be bullish and not consider how Chilwell feels when he's back fit. When Chilwell comes back eventually, he has to earn his place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yikes!!!

Chelsea confirm £145.6m loss as pandemic and transfer business bites hard

The club has published its accounts for the most recent financial year

https://www.football.london/Chelsea-fc/Chelsea-confirm-1456m-loss-pandemic-22601429

 

Chelsea made a post-tax loss of £145.6million for the financial year ending in June, with the club pointing to the pandemic’s impact and a decreased profit on player sales in their latest accounts.

Roman Abramovich's club made a profit of £39.5million a year previous.

 

Overall turnover jumped by £29million to £416.8million, mostly thanks to a boost in broadcast income, but matchday revenue was obliterated owing to most of last season taking place behind closed doors and there was a knock-on impact to commercial income.

Edited by Vesper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Vesper said:

yikes!!!

Chelsea confirm £145.6m loss as pandemic and transfer business bites hard

The club has published its accounts for the most recent financial year

https://www.football.london/Chelsea-fc/Chelsea-confirm-1456m-loss-pandemic-22601429

 

Chelsea made a post-tax loss of £145.6million for the financial year ending in June, with the club pointing to the pandemic’s impact and a decreased profit on player sales in their latest accounts.

Roman Abramovich's club made a profit of £39.5million a year previous.

 

Overall turnover jumped by £29million to £416.8million, mostly thanks to a boost in broadcast income, but matchday revenue was obliterated owing to most of last season taking place behind closed doors and there was a knock-on impact to commercial income.

Crazy that you win CL, finish summer transfer window around zero and still record big loss. And UEFA wonder why clubs want Super League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Crazy that you win CL, finish summer transfer window around zero and still record big loss. And UEFA wonder why clubs want Super League.

Last summer's transfer window was not included on the accounts for year 20/21. The previous year of heavy spending (around -190m€ net) was included in the amortisations.

Would assume the next one is much better when matchday income has (so far) returned to more or less normal and transfers for the 21/22 season are included, when there have been sales of around 160m€ consisting mostly from academy players who had zero amortisation value to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have expected a few weeks ago that Rudiger would be the only player we'd lose but it's now looking more and more likely that Christensen and Azpi could move on too.

It's far from ideal that we'll need to replace 3 first team players automatically before we even look at improving a squad which has shown in recent weeks it needs refreshing.

I can see the club moving for one of the players who's contracts are expiring this summer like Sule or Ginter and I wouldn't be surprised if Tuchel looked at recalling Colwill next season as a left footed centre back. That would probably leave us with needing one big centre back signing then to go with the above and Silva and Chalobah (bearing in mind Silva will be 38 next season though, he can't go on forever no matter how good he is).

I feel with the system and Tuchel's coaching that any decent/good centre back would look significantly better. You only have to look at how much better Azpi, Rudiger and Christensen look in a back 3 compared to a back 4 (even going back to Conte's days). I would be more inclined to be spending money on (a) wing backs, (b) an attacking upgrade on the likes of Pulisic and Ziyech and (c) a dominant midfielder to take over long term from Kante.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

Crazy that you win CL, finish summer transfer window around zero and still record big loss. And UEFA wonder why clubs want Super League.

We were over £50m to the good net-wise on transfers when all inbound and outbound transfer fees and loans were taken into account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chelsea_4_eva said:

So theres a big possibility that we're gonna lose Andreas, Rudi and Azpi all on free.. We need to shop for a whole new defence lol

b9c8a2c793377292b6394003823952af.png

 

plus these also expire in June, 2022

b853f593e81ef64c52a309ce6b456b62.pngb458823e153ef47b2f0cf9eb585aef43.png6e04106b01f4f8d8274f497a86af4872.png

Edited by Vesper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Vesper said:

We were over £50m to the good net-wise on transfers when all inbound and outbound transfer fees and loans were taken into account.

Aren't these figures based on the previous summer spending?

I think the deals last summer come into effect next time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Superblue_1986 said:

Aren't these figures based on the previous summer spending?

I think the deals last summer come into effect next time.

no that was adding up just action in the summer window, I kept a very detailed track of it all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FUCK 🤬

Reece injury

Reported by The Athletic it could see him unavailable until well into the New Year, with healthline.com reporting:

Typically, partial tears heal in 4 to 8 weeks, while complete tears take about 3 months. You should start to feel better with regular physical therapy and lots of rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Vesper said:

FUCK 🤬

Reece injury

Reported by The Athletic it could see him unavailable until well into the New Year, with healthline.com reporting:

Typically, partial tears heal in 4 to 8 weeks, while complete tears take about 3 months. You should start to feel better with regular physical therapy and lots of rest.

Just throwing this suggestion out there - Kieran Trippier, anyone? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You