Erling Haaland

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

6 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

Unlikely Tuchel will bench Werner, he is crucial for our attack.

True but Haaland is rapid as well and could offer a similar outcome. Also, I'd wager Mount and Havertz would be seen as priorities over Werner. 

[Jase 43,479]

8 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

Unlikely Tuchel will bench Werner, he is crucial for our attack.

I feel like Tuchel is gonna have problems trying to keep everyone happy next season as well as tactically in terms of trying to fit everyone into a cohesive unit. The back 3 or back 4 will have its problems with the attackers that we've got.

[Pizy 18,849]

He’s a transformational, truly generational player on the same level as Neymar & Mbappe. And in my personal opinion when you take into account his physique and overpowering skill set I’d much rather have Haaland than Neymar. 
 

If you as a club have any slim chance to potentially sign this sort of player with minimal competition you must at least try. And I hope that’s how our club are viewing this. It’s an absurd, gargantuan amount of money but if he is finally the 25+ league goals per season guy we’ve been craving for a decade then it’s worth it. He’s only 22 for goodness sake. 

Even if he and Raiola start trying to engineer a move in 4 years time it’s worth it. Because we’d make our money back and then some and can sign the next Haaland.

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

3 minutes ago, Jas said:

I feel like Tuchel is gonna have problems trying to keep everyone happy next season as well as tactically in terms of trying to fit everyone into a cohesive unit. The back 3 or back 4 will have its problems with the attackers that we've got.

7 players for 3 roles in a 343

7 players for 4 roles in a 4231 and 433

 

Either we sell an attacker or two or Tuchel will definitely have some unhappy players. 

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

Falk just confirmed the rumors

[Jase 43,479]

2 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

7 players for 3 roles in a 343

7 players for 4 roles in a 4231 and 433

Either we sell an attacker or two or Tuchel will definitely have some unhappy players. 

If we sell two players, we could potentially take away the squad depth. If we sell one, then it's probably still okay. But again, how long can we rotate before someone complains about the playing time? That's for the back 3.

If we go to a back 4, then comes the tactical problems. If we play 4-2-3-1, where does Havertz fit in? Where does Mount fit in? Where does Werner fit in? Havertz may or may not be as the #10. Mount doesn't seem good in the pivot and isn't really creative enough as a #10. Werner isn't going to create too much from wide areas. If we play 4-3-3, where does Havertz fit in? He's not really suited to playing in the midfield or wide areas. Also the same question mark with Werner in the wide areas. Then we also gotta make sure everyone else, including the midfielders and defenders can function in a back 4 and not have a system breakdown like we saw under Lampard. Tuchel used the back 3 to help paper over those cracks. 

[Jase 43,479]

40 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

------Haaland-------

Mount-----Havertz

Every time someone hype up a potential attacking lineup, it never works out. Remember when most of us were salivating at the prospect of Pulisic-Havertz-Ziyech behind Werner last summer? 🤣 Or remember MaZaCar? That didn't last too long either. 

[milka 3,390]

 

[R2D2 368]

It is claimed that Borussia Dortmund have asked for a fee of £154m in order to part ways with their star man Haaland, a request that Blues owner Roman Abramovich is reportedly prepared to oblige. (Express) #CFC #BVB

[King Kante 1,643]

26 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

Falk just confirmed the rumors

Falk has lost the plot recently, I rank his opinions these days at about the same as I do those found in the Daily Sport. 

[Jase 43,479]

Just now, King Kante said:

Falk has lost the plot recently, I rank his opinions these days at about the same as I do those found in the Daily Sport. 

Don't forget, Mount hates Havertz!

[Superblue 6,372]

12 minutes ago, Jas said:

If we sell two players, we could potentially take away the squad depth. If we sell one, then it's probably still okay. But again, how long can we rotate before someone complains about the playing time? That's for the back 3.

If we go to a back 4, then comes the tactical problems. If we play 4-2-3-1, where does Havertz fit in? Where does Mount fit in? Where does Werner fit in? Havertz may or may not be as the #10. Mount doesn't seem good in the pivot and isn't really creative enough as a #10. Werner isn't going to create too much from wide areas. If we play 4-3-3, where does Havertz fit in? He's not really suited to playing in the midfield or wide areas. Also the same question mark with Werner in the wide areas. Then we also gotta make sure everyone else, including the midfielders and defenders can function in a back 4 and not have a system breakdown like we saw under Lampard. Tuchel used the back 3 to help paper over those cracks. 

Next season with the Super Cup and World Club Cup, we've got even more games than normal. 3 - 4 extra games may not feel a lot but the World Club Cup in particular is awkward to push back league games for us so there will be more weeks of 3 games. The options hasn't done City any harm and if anything has aided them being able to challenge for everything they've entered. I'd argue the ability for Tuchel to rotate the options in attack helped us tackle 3 competitions ourselves.

The other thing to consider is our attacking options have been susceptible to injury. Werner and Mount got flogged to death in stages last season because Pulisic, Ziyech and Havertz all had to contend with injuries. All it takes is a couple out for 3 - 4 weeks and suddenly the options look incredibly thin. Ziyech will also miss time with AFCON and wasn't there talk of Pulisic representing USA in the Olympics?

If (and a big if) we were able to buy Haaland then I would look at an attacking group of Mount, Ziyech, Havertz, Pulisic, Werner and Haaland. Besides Haaland, the others are comfortable with playing different roles in that attack. It gives us strong options from the bench and should keep pushing every one of them to challenge for minutes but stay fresh through the season. I'd be inclined to keep Hudson Odoi also, primarily as an attacking alternative to James at wing back (if the alternative is someone like Adama or Hoffmann then it seems a no brainer). But CHO then also gives an extra option in attack if we're struggling with injuries.