The Conte Thread

[Sideshow Luiz 2,310]

Okay, Spurs and Arsenal.  You two can just kick lumps out of each other for the last 40 min, now.

Something dawned on me as Kane just put that penalty in.  None of our recent 16 goals have come from the spot.  I think that maybe 2-3 have come from corners.  But the rest are open play.  

[Sideshow Luiz 2,310]

Look at Spurs trying to play the 343.  CBs are standing with the ball at their feet, no one showing from midfield or WB to get the ball.  Both fullbacks, who received so much praise for their hard work last season, look shattered and they aren't even coming back to help build up play.  

 

[Fernando 6,585]

Good result for us that Arsenal-Spurs. 

Liverpool, I think they will win. But we shall see.

And United.....they will win because Mourinho is not there. 

[Jase 43,479]

Spare a thought for Walter Mazzarri when people say Pochettino, Koeman etc are trying to copy Conte's tactics.

[WNDS 502]

Bah, I posted after the Hull game that I had very high hopes for the new system, and I'm absolutely loving what Conte's done with the team; I just wish I'd been able to catch more of these games live. We've been playing strategically/tactically/aesthetically sublime football for the last few weeks, and I've been missing a majority of it . ....And now an international break has come along at just the wrong moment. Hopefully we can keep this level of performance going for a while longer yet, although I would be surprised if we do. Nonetheless, the team's progress has been remarkable over the last month, and even if performance levels DO take a dip, the recovery seems to be occurring ahead of schedule. Superb work so far.

[Unionjack 7,531]

1 hour ago, Sideshow Luiz said:

Doesn't make sense.  They've got the top defence (statistically) in the league.  Why change?

Some of our attacking moves were a little disjointed in the first few weeks after the switch.  It's obviously quite difficult to pick it up straight away. 

When they played citeh they mirrored their 3-3-4 and amazingly they totally did shut them out so they came here obviously having trained and studied for us using it, and after a few minutes we all could tell that it just didn't work.

Ive not been a big studier of formations but which formation would be suited best AGAINST US.

I was thinking summet like 4-5-1 and try to over run our CMs but then we would still have a fluid back 5 to cover. So i dunno.

[Tomo 21,751]

16 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

When they played citeh they mirrored their 3-3-4 and amazingly they totally did shut them out so they came here obviously having trained and studied for us using it, and after a few minutes we all could tell that it just didn't work.

Ive not been a big studier of formations but which formation would be suited best AGAINST US.

I was thinking summet like 4-5-1 and try to over run our CMs but then we would still have a fluid back 5 to cover. So i dunno.

They may have got a 1-1 at City but I wouldn't say they totally shut them out, the keeper saved two pens aswell as made what felt like 200 other saves, they got totally battered.

[Jase 43,479]

33 minutes ago, Tomo said:

They may have got a 1-1 at City but I wouldn't say they totally shut them out, the keeper saved two pens aswell as made what felt like 200 other saves, they got totally battered.

Funnily enough, Everton probably used up their luck quota at City. They could have easily lost that game by 4/5 goals.

[Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067]

8 hours ago, TheIceMan said:

Had it long before You! 

Curses! 

[Fulham Broadway 17,306]

This is one manager we don't want to see sacked for coming second or something

[Jase 43,479]

19 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

This is one manager we don't want to sack for coming second or something

We can forget about any successful future if we sack Conte for coming second after the season we had last time out.

[LAM09 7,043]

10 minutes ago, Jason said:

We can forget about any successful future if we sack Conte for coming second after the season we had last time out.

There's no way the board would be that stupid. His job will only be on the line, if top 4 isn't achieved.

[lorenzojuve 28]

Forza Chelsea e Forza Conte!
 Siete la migliore società d'Inghilterra!

Top Clubs of England!

Top supporters of England!

 

[Jase 43,479]

8 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

There's no way the board would be that stupid. His job will only be on the line, if top 4 isn't achieved.

The board has been scaling new levels of stupidity. It'll be not be surprising if they were to do that.

[Tomo 21,751]

9 minutes ago, Jason said:

The board has been scaling new levels of stupidity. It'll be not be surprising if they were to do that.

If we finish 2nd the way we have been playing then no chance is happening, if we suddenly from a fortnight forward go all 10/11 and start producing stale rubbish and sneak 2nd through grinding undeserved results then he might be in trouble. I still get annoyed by this myth we keep sacking great managers out of the blue when we are doing well, aside from Ranieri (and Avram if you believe he was the gaffer in anything other than name) all our sackings have been with the team in a downward spiral, infact you could make a case for all of them surviving longer than they actually deserved.