Barbara 15,149 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 Have to say, Mourinho has certainly pulled no punches with what he has said. He has been sending out the message that "we'll be challenging for the titles", "we are ready to compete" etc and that practically means, should he find any excuses next season, it could well fall flat on his face. Considering Mourinho's nature, am surprised he has taken a bold and initiative approach rather than trying to play the 'underdog' cards. Gonna be interesting to see what happens next season.he's been saying that for one year... it's not something new he just added to his speech.I think he was honest last year and continues to be. We were in transition, he was getting to know the squad and see what they're made of (mentally speaking). Targeting titles would have been premature or wishful thinking, but even then he was speaking about how this current season we would step up.Now he knows those players and he's added the key ones he believes he needed. Chelsea is a top team in England, what else is he supposed to say and do now?He could still fail - after all we aren't the only top team in the country - but his speech last season concerning that season and this one has been coherent and reasonable imo.I see nothing that surprises me. kellzfresh, bababoom, Madmax and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 It think its unfair to criticise Jose for youth development. Its no secret that our main priority is to win the league so if Jose feels that the use of young inexperienced players should be minimal then one can't really argue against it.However I am sure he'll give them few chances in the Carling Cup and against opponents where we've established a strong lead. The exposure may not be much but I guess thats the best he can do considering the priority is to win a major trophy. Our academy players will get chances but it won't happen so soon. Managerial longevity is the key to youth development success and so we as fans must remain patient.We must decide if we want to either win trophies this year or really develop young players because achieving both will not be possible. Rodgers used his first year at Liverpool to establish a philosophy and prepare for the future and this as a result lead them to finish outside the top 4. So, I guess its important that we do not worry so much and have faith in our manager and club. Sidzeret 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazLaughlan 55 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 I think we've done some fantastic business this window which puts us in a strong position. If Costa can find form early we will be a real force to be reckoned with. Talent like Matic, Fabregas, Hazard and Schurrle are up there with the best midfield in the world IMO. Muzchap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! pHaRaOn 2,131 Posted July 28, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted July 28, 2014 Jose Mourinho: “My conscience is simple. “If, in a few years, Baker, Brown and Solanke are not national team players, I should blame myself. “They are part of a process the club started without me, during that period before I came back. Solanke in goal-scoring action for England U17s: “But now I have players who will be Chelsea players. And when they become Chelsea players, they will become England players, almost for sure. "I’m not saying we’re doing it just for English football, because it is also about us. "Chelsea is seen as a ‘graveyard’ for young talent. But at the moment, officially in the first-team squad, we have Andreas Christiansen, Nathan Ake, probably Baker, because I want to have one more English player. “So we are going to have in the first-team squad three players coming from the academy.“Of course, Baker, Brown, Solanke and Boga cannot all be in my squad because I cannot have 30. But these four are going to work with us all season. "At 17, I don’t think it’s good for them to go to play in the Championship or somewhere. No, at 17 they have to train with us and learn with us – and they will learn a lot – and play in the Under-21s, maybe for us in the Capital One Cup, the FA Cup... now and again. “You must remember they are 17, they are not 20. When they are playing in the Under-21s, they are playing against 20-year-old guys. But if they are with us every day, for them I think it is fantastic. “So we have them coming through, and also Christiansen, Ake, Kurt Zouma. “You are talking about seven or eight guys and, in two or three years, Chelsea has a strong team with seven or eight of these guys - either English or from the academy. Homegrown players in the team. It will be a complete turnaround. "At the moment you look at the Champions League list and John Terry is the only one club trained.”http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/3-chelsea-kids-dont-play-3927033 Barbara, The Skipper, darrus and 4 others 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 There you go people. No loans cause he wants them to learn. Some will still complain. Smh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barbara 15,149 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 There you go people. No loans cause he wants them to learn. Some will still complain. Smh.yeah, because I've been wondering what people were questioning about his decision to keep them in the first team.Did people honestly expect them to have match time promptly? If you're training under José Mourinho at age 17, 18, 19 or even 20, that's a feat in itself and it'll certainly help your development into a senior player. Anyone was aware they wouldn't have much play time, but that's all that is really important at this stage for these boys? It isn't and in the case of the ones kept in the u-21 they'll still have play time. But what Aké, Christensen and maybe Baker (relieved that he finally revealed his plans for the kid) have to go through is the same in any big team in the world. If there's an injury or an emergency plan is needed, you're there and you'll have minutes. When for whatever reason a player has to be spared, you'll have minutes. In the very first season those minutes could be very limited, but that's the natural process anywhere, the difference is when a team doesn't have such quality as Chelsea in the seniors, the youth is used more often, but they will be used at some point. I think people are a bit obsessed with our youth players being incorporated in the first team - within reason, as Mourinho said, it became a graveyard, but everyone - players and fans - should also be patient and aware this is a step-by-step process. Tomo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petre.ispirescu 4,928 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 So Zouma is staying - that's good to hear.Haven't heard Jose mentioning Loftus-Cheek in any of his comments tho - he is one talent Chelsea can't waste. Does anybody know why he's doing the pre-season with the U-21, instead of being with the big boys? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 yeah, because I've been wondering what people were questioning about his decision to keep them in the first team.Did people honestly expect them to have match time promptly? If you're training under José Mourinho at age 17, 18, 19 or even 20, that's a feat in itself and it'll certainly help your development into a senior player. Anyone was aware they wouldn't have much play time, but that's all that is really important at this stage for these boys? It isn't and in the case of the ones kept in the u-21 they'll still have play time. But what Aké, Christensen and maybe Baker (relieved that he finally revealed his plans for the kid) have to go through is the same in any big team in the world. If there's an injury or an emergency plan is needed, you're there and you'll have minutes. When for whatever reason a player has to be spared, you'll have minutes. In the very first season those minutes could be very limited, but that's the natural process anywhere, the difference is when a team doesn't have such quality as Chelsea in the seniors, the youth is used more often, but they will be used at some point. I think people are a bit obsessed with our youth players being incorporated in the first team - within reason, as Mourinho said, it became a graveyard, but everyone - players and fans - should also be patient and aware this is a step-by-step process.People don't know what they want. They want trophies, but they also want youth., completely ignoring the fact it's nearly impossible to win anything with youth. If you catch Jose's eye, you're doing something right. I agree that it's more beneficial to Ake, Baker, Boga, and Christensen to train and learn with the senior team than playing with a midtable Premier or Championship side. They won't play a ton, but a few sub appearances in the PL, and FA Cup and COC is good, which Mou said they would play. Also they are good just for depth. People get excited cause they want another player from the academy, so they are impatient. I'm glad Mou acknowledged the negatives of our youth system, he knows people want us to develop players, but as you said, it's a process. We'll get there, fingers crossed for Baker! Barbara, Tomo and Daniel1980 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! bababoom 4,478 Posted July 28, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted July 28, 2014 We need to makes sure we keep Mourinho for a few years, stability is key when promoting youth. Jose knows most if not all of the youth players now and is keeping an eye on all of them. Lets say Jose gets fired, we hire another manager who knows he has get off to the best possible start so he spends £100 million or so on new players meaning the youngsters get loaned out or sold... it's just a never ending cycle. It's exciting buying world class players but nothing feels better than academy players making it. I'm getting sick of Chelsea being labeled as some sort of 'graveyard for youngsters', it's true but i'm so desperate for that to change. I cant even get excited when watching the Youth Cup or u21 games... i'm sure we have players of the same caliber as the likes of Shaw, Sterling, Chambers, Ibe etc, we just need to give them a chance for gods sake. The only place to be, Madmax, Reddish-Blue and 7 others 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,754 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 We need to makes sure we keep Mourinho for a few years, stability is key when promoting youth. Jose knows most if not all of the youth players now and is keeping an eye on all of them. Lets say Jose gets fired, we hire another manager who knows he has get off to the best possible start so he spends £100 million or so on new players meaning the youngsters get loaned out or sold... it's just a never ending cycle. It's exciting buying world class players but nothing feels better than academy players making it. I'm getting sick of Chelsea being labeled as some sort of 'graveyard for youngsters', it's true but i'm so desperate for that to change. I cant even get excited when watching the Youth Cup or u21 games... i'm sure we have players of the same caliber as the likes of Shaw, Sterling, Chambers, Ibe etc, we just need to give them a chance for gods sake. Problem is Southampton are the only club who tend to promote youngsters at the first avalible opportunity, and look at what's happening now, they are going to have to see Shaw, Lallana, Chambers, Chamberlain, Walcott, Rodriguez return to the St Marys in opposition colours for the next decade, Bale is another one but he went abroad. If we adopted the same philosophy we would be a mid table club and lose the best one's to.I would much rather take the patient approach and see Baker for example come fully in at 21 22 and spend his whole career here.Realistically we are unlikely to make teenagers a trusted member of the squad unless they are a freak of nature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bababoom 4,478 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 Problem is Southampton are the only club who tend to promote youngsters at the first avalible opportunity, and look at what's happening now, they are going to have to see Shaw, Lallana, Chambers, Chamberlain, Walcott, Rodriguez return to the St Marys in opposition colours for the next decade, Bale is another one but he went abroad. If we adopted the same philosophy we would be a mid table club and lose the best one's to.I would much rather take the patient approach and see Baker for example come fully in at 21 22 and spend his whole career here.Realistically we are unlikely to make teenagers a trusted member of the squad unless they are a freak of nature.That's my whole point, it's why i want Mourinho to stay for many years. I'm not saying we should just throw every talented youngster into the deep end, no, we have a fantastic team this season and i expect the youngsters to get their chance in the Cup competitions. Ferguson had a similar approach, first he had a winning team and than promoted youth players so they can train with the first team and play in cup competitions, every year he would slowly use them more and more. Tomo, Madmax, The only place to be and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellzfresh 7,229 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 First of all, we need to keep one manager.Ancelloti liked mcaecran and he got sacked, that was the end for the lad.AVB liked sturridge after he never got a chance.RDM liked Bertrand but now he's gone.Benitez liked Ake and now he rarely plays. When Jose gets his liked player we can't afford to sack him or the cycle continues. The Chels, Blue-in-me-Veins and Daniel1980 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmax 9,219 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 People don't know what they want. They want trophies, but they also want youth., completely ignoring the fact it's nearly impossible to win anything with youth. People do know what they want; they're not asking to thrust Bamford, Chalobah or <take your pick here> into the spine of the team, what they're asking for is a talented, homegrown player that they can identify with to at least be a part of the squad. It's frustrating when we'd rather spend £18m on Yuri Zhirkov to play 50 games for us than trust someone that came through our ranks to do that job. It's also frustrating when Paulo Ferreira and Hilario hang around till they're 35 while Todd Kane and Jamal Blackman cool their heels in the reserves or at Blackburn. You may not win anything with youth when they're all you have but you won't go far wrong when you're using them to supplement established, 'finished article' types like Lampard and Terry. Somewhat akin to the little decorations at the tip of the brances on a christmas tree, not the stem itself. But like James said above, it's only possible when we trust a manager to handle and shape the team to his ideas over an extended period of time. bababoom, The only place to be and killer1257 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 I have to say, Mourinho's plan for our young guys is very, very exciting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reddish-Blue 2,701 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 People do know what they want; they're not asking to thrust Bamford, Chalobah or <take your pick here> into the spine of the team, what they're asking for is a talented, homegrown player that they can identify with to at least be a part of the squad. It's frustrating when we'd rather spend £18m on Yuri Zhirkov to play 50 games for us than trust someone that came through our ranks to do that job. It's also frustrating when Paulo Ferreira and Hilario hand around till they're 35 while Todd Kane and Jamal Blackman cool their heels in the reserves or at Blackburn. You may not win anything with youth when they're all you have but you won't go far wrong when you're using them to supplement established, 'finished article' types like Lampard and Terry. Somewhat akin to the little decorations at the tip of the brances on a christmas tree, not the stem itself. But like James said above, it's only possible when we trust a manager to handle and shape the team to his ideas over an extended period of time.To be fair, neither Kane or Blackman look like their good enough for Chelsea's first teamPaulo Ferreira was a dependable squad player and i'm glad Chelsea kept him around till last season. darrus 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Love it, love it, absolutely loving it!!! Boga, brown, baker, solanke probablt bamford in a couple of seasons. Ake and chirstensen already there. Expecting atleast 2/3/4 of them to make it big.Suprising that their is no mention of RLC!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 People do know what they want; they're not asking to thrust Bamford, Chalobah or <take your pick here> into the spine of the team, what they're asking for is a talented, homegrown player that they can identify with to at least be a part of the squad. Pretty much. Once you've got that spine established then you can trust youngsters and the older players will carry them.Keeping Ake around is fantastic because he's a wonderful young player, he's versatile and he's consistently improved in his time here which is exactly what you want from youngsters. Christensen needs to be kept around because he's just not ready to go out on-loan yet. He's a lovely player on the ball, he's got decent physical attributes but defensively there are still massive things to work on and I think Mourinho, JT and Cahill are great people to learn from.I just think it's a shame that Chalobah went from having a great season in the Championship to being messed around by the club last year and now we're looking for another loan for him whilst Mikel continues to earn £75k p/w despite being, well... him. bababoom 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmax 9,219 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 To be fair, neither Kane or Blackman look like their good enough for Chelsea's first teamPaulo Ferreira was a dependable squad player and i'm glad Chelsea kept him around till last season.Blackman doesn't look like he's good enough but Hilario and Turnbull were? I don't understand why we kept Hilario around last season instead of Jamal. He can't be that bad?!Paulo made a grand total of 16 appearances in his last two seasons at the club, only half of those in the league. What exactly did he bring to the table that Kane couldn't? He didn't need to have a roster spot to be a good influence around the dressing room.And to reiterate, I'm not talking about prominent roles, just to 'fill in' for a handful of games a season when they're required to come in and do a job. It's a question of will at the end of the day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjperdeath 2,226 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Blackman doesn't look like he's good enough but Hilario and Turnbull were? I don't understand why we kept Hilario around last season instead of Jamal. He can't be that bad?!Paulo made a grand total of 16 appearances in his last two seasons at the club, only half of those in the league. What exactly did he bring to the table that Kane couldn't? He didn't need to have a roster spot to be a good influence around the dressing room.And to reiterate, I'm not talking about prominent roles, just to 'fill in' for a handful of games a season when they're required to come in and do a job. It's a question of will at the end of the day.I think what he's trying to say is that Paulo and the two goalkeepers are infact better players who would effortlessly fit into the life of first teamer than the other young players who would need the club to have more stability to see themselves as last case choice. Not to mention that Paulo as an individual is a really good professional and a fantastic role model to have in the dressing room.but I get where you're coming from, especially that neither Paulo or the goalkeepers had a huge involvement with the first team (though Paulo did have that decent game against a tough Benfica side) . It's the confidence that the manager has on players like Kane and Jamal that we've missed for a long time. Reddish-Blue 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmax 9,219 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 I think what he's trying to say is that Paulo and the two goalkeepers are infact better players who would effortlessly fit into the life of first teamer than the other young players who would need the club to have more stability to see themselves as last case choice. I agree stability is imperative for this reality to change and I said so above; I've been saying it since a while now. It's nice to see Mourinho saying the things he's been saying over the last couple of days but forgive me for being a little circumspect till the words get translated into action for nobody knows what'll happen at the end of the season. hjperdeath 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts