The Mourinho Thread

[The only place to be 11,313]

Jose talks about last night´s failure to divert attention from players, I read above.

Then, I would like to ask..does his talk about Citeh winning the PL helps Chelsea´s players ?

Really? It's designed to apply pressure to City and take the pressure off of our own players. Do you honestly think he tells the players that they're not good enough to win the title in the privacy of the training ground?

[AswinR 96]

That is true but think by now, people have wised up to his usual tricks and I don't think it has stopped people from talking about our failure to convert chances yesterday; the striker situation and others.

glad it was not just me who tought that....but the striker situation did come up ....it was that obvious

Jose talks about last night´s failure to divert attention from players, I read above.

Then, I would like to ask..does his talk about Citeh winning the PL helps Chelsea´s players ?

so that there is no pressure or "seems " like there is none .... but we all know he has an eye on the trophy... infact an eye on all the trophies and thats the kinda guy he is....

[The only place to be 11,313]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-WDZikiXhQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Fat Sam does realise his team is still in the relegation zone doesn't he?

He did well to get his tactics spot on and limit us to just 39 attempts. Here's the thing you fat cunt, we're still in a title race.

The only race you're involved in is the one between the sack and the heart attack...which one is going to get you first??

[bushman 2,043]

Really? It's designed to apply pressure to City and take the pressure off of our own players. Do you honestly think he tells the players that they're not good enough to win the title in the privacy of the training ground?

Are you so backward that you think the players do not read the papers ?

[The only place to be 11,313]

Are you so backward that you think the players do not read the papers ?

The players understand exactly what he's doing. The members of this forum seem to know exactly what he's doing. The only person who doesn't is you apparently.

Or to put it in a way you might understand....

I read here that some members don't not understanding what Jose is saying to the Citehs. But the Chelsea player noes what trick he is pulling and will listen in the privates to his words.

[bushman 2,043]

The players understand exactly what he's doing. The members of this forum seem to know exactly what he's doing. The only person who doesn't is you apparently.

Or to put it in a way you might understand....

I read here that some members don't not understanding what Jose is saying to the Citehs. But the Chelsea player noes what trick he is pulling and will listen in the privates to his words.

No comment.

[Fernando 6,585]

Fat Sam does realise his team is still in the relegation zone doesn't he?

He did well to get his tactics spot on and limit us to just 39 attempts. Here's the thing you fat cunt, we're still in a title race.

The only race you're involved in is the one between the sack and the heart attack...which one is going to get you first??

Still was funny as hell!

[Blue Traveler 256]

No we did it in both legs against Barca and in the final against Bayern. We definitely 'parked the bus', i still remember Drogba playing as a LB But we won and no one can take that away from us. So when i see Chelsea fans on twitter and Facebook slate West Ham for 'parking the bus' i just laugh because when we did it they hailed our performance as 'heroic'.

It's our own fault we couldn't get past them, West Ham wanted a point and they got it, fair play.

My definition of "parking the bus" is a little bit different than yours!

How can West Ham 11 man defending in their own half with 1 shot and to threat be compared with us defending and countering on the break in semi final of UCL and winning the game home and drawing with a man off away?!

No way that's a bus! if it was the West was "Dump Truck"!!!

BTW i said i have no problem with this kind of approach as i believe it gives better chance of dominance! even though we had our share of good chances to wrap up the game but couldn't take'em so if any one's to blame it definitely us!

[Roquila 1,335]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-WDZikiXhQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Sam is a fat cunt and i dislike him very much but to be honest his reaction is funny. It's like he won the Champions league lol. His team is still in relegation battle and he is still in danger to get sacked.

[Melanicus 5,208]

Mourinho is a big hypocrite for criticizing the way West Ham played. Forgot Inter already???

[HD3D 1,038]

Mourinho is a big hypocrite for criticizing the way West Ham played. Forgot Inter already???

Mourinho parked the bus to get a CL title. This fucker parked the bus to get 1 point at mid season with zero strategical interest.

[DoubleO 192]

media focusing on José's "whining". in fact he said he respects the way West Ham players were fighting to keep the clean sheet and also said he doesn't want to criticize referees for single situations but he didn't like the fact that the referee only gave 4 added minutes because West Ham were playing time throughout the second half in particular. this is a "wrong signal" from the ref, but after all he did let the game go for like 96 minutes so he kinda fixed his mistake.

[Fernando 6,585]

Mourinho parked the bus to get a CL title. This fucker parked the bus to get 1 point at mid season with zero strategical interest.

The circumstances doesn't change a thing.

But I do get the point where he just blatantly is being hypocrite to deflect attention from the players to him.

SAF did it, Wenger does it, so it's a common thing.

The funny thing is that people don't like it, just like fans here didn't like SAF for his hypocrisy and Wenger constant moaning, but hey each coach did/does what suits them best.

[The Chels 2,502]

Mata and De Bruyne - limited athleticism and physicality (something which wouldn't normally hinder an AM) but technically very good/world class = sidelined and sold

Ramires and Ivanovic - good athleticism (Ramires) and physicality (Ivan), but technically atrocious (to the extent you wonder how they are footballers) = untouchables

Mindboggling. Can someone explain the reasoning to me?!

Azpilicueta at RB & Cole/Bertrand at LB > Ivanovic at RB & Azpi/Bertrand/Cole at LB

Any decent central midfielder > Ramires

[The only place to be 11,313]

Mindboggling. Can someone explain the reasoning to me?!

Mourinho values athleticism alongside technical ability.