Hutcho 8,443 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Some fella is telling me on twitter he has spoken to Fellaini's brother (apparently they're from the same school in Bruxelles) and Marouane will sign for Chelsea in the next 72 hours.https://twitter.com/PakoJKYeah well my mothers' friends' brothers' cousins' uncles' wifes' step son is maroune fellaini's mum's best friend and she said that is BS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutcho 8,443 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Agreed - out of likes That's my biggest problem at present, it's just a collection of names - how can we be working on shape, understanding etc if the personnel / playing style / ethos keeps changing?The sooner it's all resolved the better - and hope our 'new' manager is considered with these purchases as they might want to change it again!!!Lol mate, your always out of likes.....You like Whore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,963 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 The people here who are saying he's not worth the money or not the player we need are the same ones who will be kicking themselves later if he goes to United and shits on the rest of the league.Potential superstar in my eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Namika 922 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I have seen the brother of Fellaini a lot of times.He is in the same university that one of my friend.So, if the guy from twitter lives in Brussels it can be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Please, please, please, don't let this be true.Someone please tell me where he's supposed to fit in our system exactly?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellzfresh 7,229 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Please, please, please, don't let this be true.Someone please tell me where he's supposed to fit in our system exactly?!possesion system = Benatphysical system = Fellani Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetsajCFC 1,255 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Are there any reliable sources for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Well no one can really know because we're going to change managers again, and maybe that new manager will prefer 4-3-3.That's a good point. And assuming it will be Guardiola who will be our manager next season, then he will almost certainly play 4-3-3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Please, please, please, don't let this be true.Someone please tell me where he's supposed to fit in our system exactly?!Simple...we'll just play the old 3-6-1 with 6 attacking midfielders. It's like a reverse parking the bus...is that driving the bus? CechAzpilicueta Terry Luiz Moses/ Mata/Hazard/Fellaini/Oscar/KDB Ba Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nadavTKL 1,787 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 LDN Blue asked a legit question, no reason to act like that.I would like to know too actually- how many of you see Fellaini as our new CDM, and how many of you think he is the man to play besides the CDM (the CM position)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 LDN Blue asked a legit question, no reason to act like that. I would like to know too actually- how many of you see Fellaini as our new CDM, and how many of you think he is the man to play besides the CDM (the CM position)? If he question is: is he good enough for us I'd say yes. If the question is: is he the man, our new cdm/cm: that depends on tactical guidelines and the presence of other players around him (eg. Are they complementary, can they compensate for his particular competencies, etc.) Any other answer would be too one-dimensional. Good enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 LDN Blue asked a legit question, no reason to act like that.I would like to know too actually- how many of you see Fellaini as our new CDM, and how many of you think he is the man to play besides the CDM (the CM position)?I see him as the new DM. That's what we saw him as when we were first interested (both at Liege and Everton) and that's where we have a need now. If we're actually looking to use him as an attacking midfielder then the club are exhibiting levels of daftness that I didn't think they were capable of. He could be our Busquets/Khedira depending on what formation we use going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zola kinda blue 89 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 How can people seriously doubt if he would improve us?He has single handly driven Everton to wins with desire and energy, something we have been seriously missing.We have Mikel, Lamps and Ramires and have had to move Luiz into midfield. (And a bunch of kids out on loan)We need him and deep lying playmaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 How can people seriously doubt if he would improve us?He has single handly driven Everton to wins with desire and energy, something we have been seriously missing.We have Mikel, Lamps and Ramires and have had to move Luiz into midfield. (And a bunch of kids out on loan)We need him and deep lying playmakerThat's not our style of play though! We're not a squad that needs the Essien-types that make those surging runs from deep midfield. We have players like Hazard, Mata, Oscar etc to provide attacking flare. We need a proper centre midfield. The only reason Fellani's stock has risen recently is because Moyes deployed him as a faux-no.10. We don't need that, we have actual no10s. We need a player to actually sit in midfield and dictate the pace, a Pirlo-type player.I don't question the class of Fellani, he's a good player. But why Chelsea are chasing him, is beyond me. He won't offer any kind of stability in midfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zola kinda blue 89 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 That's not our style of play though! We're not a squad that needs the Essien-types that make those surging runs from deep midfield. We have players like Hazard, Mata, Oscar etc to provide attacking flare. We need a proper centre midfield. The only reason Fellani's stock has risen recently is because Moyes deployed him as a faux-no.10. We don't need that, we have actual no10s. We need a player to actually sit in midfield and dictate the pace, a Pirlo-type player.I don't question the class of Fellani, he's a good player. But why Chelsea are chasing him, is beyond me. He won't offer any kind of stability in midfield. yes we do need a play maker, but if he is played in his preferred posiiton in midfield, he will be there to defend and win back the ball and then start an attack when one of mata and Co lose the ball (as they frequently do) and then dont track back (which they dont)Too often our midfield has been easily dominated because the flair players are easily closed down and starved of the ball. Its easy to beat chelsea, close the space and dont give us time on the ball. We were lucky against Everton, because they did that very well and our midfield hardly got a touch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Fellaini is a great player but for the figures being quoted I would rather try to take Modric off Real Madrid's hands. He would be the better fit for what we are building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 He could be our Busquets/Khedira depending on what formation we use going forward.Buying him to be that kind of player would be a mistake. Only reason i can understand this is if we sign him, play him behind the striker and start playing hoofball.He has single handly driven Everton to wins with desire and energyBy playing behind Jelavic, not in the double pivot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Fellaini is a great player, but I'm not sure he would fit into our system. Chelsea being interested in Fellaini would make sense if they were planning to use him as a Plan B, someone who gives us another option. But I think we would better off to either persist with moving Oscar deeper or buying someone like Joao Moutinho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 yes we do need a play maker, but if he is played in his preferred posiiton in midfield, he will be there to defend and win back the ball and then start an attack when one of mata and Co lose the ball (as they frequently do) and then dont track back (which they dont)Too often our midfield has been easily dominated because the flair players are easily closed down and starved of the ball. Its easy to beat chelsea, close the space and dont give us time on the ball. We were lucky against Everton, because they did that very well and our midfield hardly got a touchThat's not something Fellani can come in and offer a solution for. The players should be responsible for winning the ball back once they lose it, Fellani is a good box-to-box player because he does have the stamina and agility. However I question this motive to slot him back into the DM position when he's been excelling in the attacking position where Moyes has deployed him. I'm not saying he wasn't good as a DM, but he's proven that's not where he should be. Another thing is, with Fellani the ball is hardly played to feet. His height and strength are his greatest asset, which means the old 'hoof it up and hope for the best', as I read correctly on a blog about this.. Ba would never get the ball as we'll have Luiz & Fellani taking all the shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Buying him to be that kind of player would be a mistake. Only reason i can understand this is if we sign him, play him behind the striker and start playing hoofball.This is my point. We'd revert back to Drogba tactics, nullify the role of Oscar & Hazard. That's about £50million worth of resources not utilized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts