Jump to content

Non-Chelsea Transfer Pub


Hamilton
 Share

Recommended Posts

currently we have JT-GC-zouma.

if JT retires after this season, stones is 100% NOT the answer. we will be buying an experienced CB. GC-stones at this moment looks bad. i would not want to play norwich at home with them.

considering we buy mr. X, next year. do you think jose would be willing to simply turnover our whole defensive partnership in a single season? i honestly doubt that knowing how jose likes to set up his teams.

as far as i see it, we will be buying a 20mil (max) worth player for almost double his value who would be our 3rd CB for the next 2-3 years atleast while in short term losing a perfectly fine squad player. and this is despite the fact that we have a 20 year old zouma who has already shown to be BRILLIANT in the chances he has got.

whats worse is, if we are actually going to pay 35mil for stones, we might as well put in 15mil more and buy not just someone who has potential or ceiling but someone who already is almost WC - varane.

I think you're writing Stones off far too quickly. How do you know that Stones wouldn't step up if JT retired after next season?

And we could still buy an experienced CB instead, but who do you suggest? There aren't many quality ones out there. In a couple of years we'll be in the same predicament - obviously hopefully Zouma has developed by then but we'd still need to find him a long term partner and John Stones, if he continues to develop as well, would be a very ideal partner for Happy. Why not get him now and get him to be under JT's tutelage for a season or two?

He plays with maturity beyond his years.

The quoted price for Stones atm is a £26m bid from us and I've seen that Everton might hold out for £30m. Not sure where you're getting £35m from.

Look at it this way - if the club are looking to spend £25m+ on Stones you can guarantee that he'll get lots of game time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

first of all, i'm not extrapolating. I'm adjusting for market inflation. in those days, 13m was worth 20m nowadays. And Ronaldo wasn't a no body, he was a highly regarded prospect having been playing for Portuguese national team since under 15s.

second of all. Just because the players didn't work out doesn't mean they weren't bought to improve the squad. Ferguson still bought them. He didn't just sit around like you guys are suggesting. He kept adding players to the squad. Them not working out is his failure.

We aren't buying those type of players that are coming in challenging for starting spots. Begovic is not going to contribute to the season unless Courtois is injured. And Falcao is not going to contribute unless Costa and Remy are injured.

Now, if we had bought a CM, that would be a different story. I don't want us to buy a defender or a striker just for he sake of buying some one. We need a midfielder. We aren't getting one.

lukaku was as highly regarded as CR was at 18. (infact lukaku was 17). yet he was sold for 12mil. you might be adjusting the market for inflation but that does not mean every transfer that happened should be adjusted. some of them were at their max and would have been for the same value even in today's market. that was my whole point.

i have given you examples. tell me which of those players were supposed to be fighting for a first team spot. it was not just that "it dint work out". i am sorry but which of smalling, bebe, chicha or linsgaard was supposed to set united's season on fire?

we are not buying cos we already are pretty set in our starting 11 and even in depth.

you wont find a better combo of a 1st striker in costa and 2nd striker in remy.

i would personally love oscar to be sold when he is still considered as a prospect, but jose has made his stance very clear on that. he expects oscar to have a season like hazard had last year. hence keeping the same trio since willian and hazard both had brilliant season. cuadrado had a poor second half, but people forget that his whole "second half" of the season was 343 minutes. i am glad jose is not judging juan on that. also, we have better cover in moses who was very good for stoke whenever not injured. just see mancity vs stoke to see how good.

we had one of the best back 5. plus looking to add stones. more than adeqaute cover in zouma and luis/newLB.

matic-cesc pick themselves up. again, i would love for cesc to be shifted to no.10 or us to go 4-3-3 while buying vidal/witsel, but that would again mean oscar being dropped.

the only missing player for me would be a better back-up to cesc and matic, i totally agree with you on that. but there are 40 days left, lets hope we do get that player. if not, i still would not feel bad, cos mikel and rambo are decent back ups who can do a job when required to.

also,lastly,who said that SAF just sat around doing nothing. did you read the post that i quoted of essien19's .http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/11895-general-transfer-talk/?p=1119223

"Mourinho is doing a Ferguson, other Clubs spend more, Chelsea wins more, simple as that. Begovic and Falcao are already here, maybe Stones and Witsel will come, that isn't too bad."

he says that stones and witsel will come. and thus i agreed, that this is exactly what even SAF would do. no big names but adequate cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're writing Stones off far too quickly. How do you know that Stones wouldn't step up if JT retired after next season?

And we could still buy an experienced CB instead, but who do you suggest? There aren't many quality ones out there. In a couple of years we'll be in the same predicament - obviously hopefully Zouma has developed by then but we'd still need to find him a long term partner and John Stones, if he continues to develop as wel, would be a very ideal partner for Happy. Why not get him now and get him to be under JT's tutelage for a season or two?

He plays with maturity beyond his years.

The quoted price for Stones atm is a £26m bid from us and I've seen that Everton might hold out for £30m. Not sure where you're getting £35m from.

Look at it this way - if the club are looking to spend £25m+ on Stones you can guarantee that he'll get lots of game time.

fair enough.

the 35mil i was quoting is to someone who said 26mil +moses - which makes it as a ball park figure of that.

the only point i dont agree on is both stones and zouma developing. defenders need to make mistakes to learn. every defender has. where does zouma get his game time? will even stones really get his gametime despite the fee. i mean zouma was brilliant against city and then dropped like a sack of potatoes for GC (who to be fair himself was very good after the spurs shambles).

like i said "fair enough" on the scenario that you have given me. but something like this is as likely to happen, zouma gets very less playing time and still is as "raw". and then he gets sucked into our "loan system" next year in search of gametime. stones is relegated to the bench for the "experienced" players. and which affects his own development.

currently, i would like this money to be spent on a CM rather than stones (IF there are any restrictions, which i feel may really be there after listening to jose's comments).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simeone picked up Savic. Good transfer window for Atletico.

This team might be better than 2 seasons ago...

Definitely the best team in terms of transfers this summer so far.

That's an exaggeration. Simeone and Atletico are wonderful, but they've lost Costa, Courtois, Filipe Luis, Turan, Miranda since the 13-14 season. Not forgetting Diego and Villa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an exaggeration. Simeone and Atletico are wonderful, but they've lost Costa, Courtois, Filipe Luis, Turan, Miranda since the 13-14 season. Not forgetting Diego and Villa.

Last season's barcelona would of won the title in 2013.

Atletico 2013

26 goals allowed

Atletico 2014

29 goals allowed

*Difference: Thibo returned to Chelsea, Luis was sold and Miranda missed a good chunk of the season

That was a -3 difference.

Atletico 2015

Moya

Juanfran-Godin-Gimenez-luis

Gabi-Saul

Koke-Vietto-Griezmann

Jackson

Bench: oblak, savic, suarez, Torres, Torres, Tiago, Carrasco, Garcia, etc.

Atletico has the best young core in Spain.

Oblak, gimenez, saul, koke, griezman, vietto, Correa, Torres and Carrasco...

This team has a fantastic starting 11 and quality on the bench, unlike like last season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last season's barcelona would of won the title in 2013.

Atletico 2013

26 goals allowed

Atletico 2014

29 goals allowed

*Difference: Thibo returned to Chelsea, Luis was sold and Miranda missed a good chunk of the season

That was a -3 difference.

Atletico 2015

Moya

Juanfran-Godin-Gimenez-luis

Gabi-Saul

Koke-Vietto-Griezmann

Jackson

Bench: oblak, savic, suarez, Torres, Torres, Tiago, Carrasco, Garcia, etc.

Atletico has the best young core in Spain.

Oblak, gimenez, saul, koke, griezman, vietto, Correa, Torres and Carrasco...

no they wouldn't have. they had 12 points less. 90 points in 2013-14; 78 points in 2014-15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for whatever unmentioned reasons whether its the club pulling the purse strings tight due to new stadium being built or some other daft reason Mous not going into the market for upgrades, how would the Bartomeu win effect them transfer wise? Ive seen theyre keeping Turan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last season's barcelona would of won the title in 2013.

Atletico 2013

26 goals allowed

Atletico 2014

29 goals allowed

*Difference: Thibo returned to Chelsea, Luis was sold and Miranda missed a good chunk of the season

That was a -3 difference.

Atletico 2015

Moya

Juanfran-Godin-Gimenez-luis

Gabi-Saul

Koke-Vietto-Griezmann

Jackson

Bench: oblak, savic, suarez, Torres, Torres, Tiago, Carrasco, Garcia, etc.

Atletico has the best young core in Spain.

Oblak, gimenez, saul, koke, griezman, vietto, Correa, Torres and Carrasco...

This team has a fantastic starting 11 and quality on the bench, unlike like last season

he has repeatedly said that koke will play as a CM.

on paper they have a much more exciting team than 13/14. but what that 13/14 had was spirit, character and fight. they have literally revamped their attack with carrasco, vietto, martinez, even antoine and jimenez have been there for 1 season and correa has not played yet cos of his surgery.

all in all, the jury will be out there on them. i think they take some time for gelling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You