Jump to content

Theo Walcott


 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 431
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't understand why Walcott would leave Arsenal. If he wants to play up front (which he does), no other team of any quality would make him the starter there. At Arsenal, he'll play a lot of striker. Where is he going to go that's going to give him the same opportunities? Certainly not at Chelsea where'd play an occasional match to give Torres a rest and play the rest of the time on the wings (which would force Moses out of the starting XI). I've always thought Walcott was underrated because people focus on the disappointing player he was a few years ago rather than the player he'd actually become, but he just doesn't make sense for us right now. We're stacked at attacking midfield and we're obviously committed to Torres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will be the new Kalou. Come on for 30 minutes, get in behind tired defenders and score goals. Will be a brilliant buy if hes used for that. We will get another striker though, he won't be the main striker we sign in January.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walcott will sign a new deal for sure. I just think he wants to get a prolonged role upfront and not be shifted wide. He sounded optimistic about signing the deal and so do Arsenal. Can't see why he would leave Arsenal for us unless it is for more money but he already said he just wants to play up front. I am sure he will sign a new deal in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually he's a very good link-up man - remember that's what you said you liked about Lewandowski the other day, that he offers a lot to his game. Well the same case could be made for Walcott couldn't it?

As I have said, Walcott's game is all about pace and space. Give him the latter and he will excel. Problem comes when he's not given that. When opponents defend deep and narrow against us, which the lesser sides tend too, then Walcott is basically ineffective. These problems were already evident even when he was still playing at RW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alan Pardew is such an idiot, pushing his defenders up the field against Theo Walcott, yeah good idea lets play highline against Arsenal at the emirates. Managers like him are just one season men, just managers who can get the best out of there players, but can only do it in a season.

Walcott however has always been a good player, people have laughed at me when i said go get him. People also say he can't cross or anything, well I've seen him whip in some great balls over the last two seasons, look at that cross to Giroud, one of the best crosses of the season I've seen.

Though to be fair we should probably give him a skip, because he's only going to want to play centre forward and we don't play the way Arsenal do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, Walcott is putting himself in the shop window. Any young player with ambition would not stay at Arsenal - yet you can see that Walcott perhaps wants a stint at centre-forward at Arsenal for a year or two before moving on to bigger and better things. Arsenal can't afford to let him go. I think he'll stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said, Walcott's game is all about pace and space. Give him the latter and he will excel. Problem comes when he's not given that. When opponents defend deep and narrow against us, which the lesser sides tend too, then Walcott is basically ineffective. These problems were already evident even when he was still playing at RW.

It's almost like you've looked at Walcott's speed score on FIFA and decided that he must just be about pace - he isn't. Like I said, you don't play 5 years under Wenger without becoming exceedingly comfortable on the ball, something that he was at Southampton too.

That's like saying Falcao's game is just about poaching - it's a very narrow way of defining what a player is capable of.

You criticised Falcao because he doesn't contribute as much as Lewandowski, yet Walcott offers a lot more around the box than either of them so like I said it's the inconsistency in some people's criticisms that I find a little odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said, Walcott's game is all about pace and space. Give him the latter and he will excel. Problem comes when he's not given that. When opponents defend deep and narrow against us, which the lesser sides tend too, then Walcott is basically ineffective. These problems were already evident even when he was still playing at RW.

I think thats a bit unfair, look at the goal where beat 3 men, went to ground got up and chipped the keeper. Pure class and skill that. Not pace or space. Every player goes missing in games, even Mata, but he looks like he has gone on a level.

He's young, british, proven EPL and would be relatively cheap. I reckon Chelsea could get him if we showed him the money. Lets face it , he will know he's more likely to win things with us and be well paid

Worth a punt I reckon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine playing him as striker with all the other small players we have. No aerial presence whatsoever; he won't win anything in the air and hardly a threat on crosses.

He can't exactly do anything with his back to goal either, so he needs to played in behind to take advantage of his pace and finishing ability.

I think Wenger should try starting with him and Giroud and leave OX on the bench. I can see a good partnership developing there, and Walcott would benefit from Giroud's knockdowns.

All in all i don't want him here, we need a real striker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Walcott insists on playing as striker, then we shouldn't pursue him anymore imo.

Islam Feruz can do the job for us as a CF without us going after another delusional winger dreaming of being a striker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though he scored a hattrick I still think he is shit. He has no technical ability, only pace and his decision making is awful at times. He was hardly in the game today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's from TalkSport but...

http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/transfer-rumours/130101/exclusive-arsenal-drop-interest-wilfried-zaha-becasue-theo-w

talkSPORT understands Arsenal have dropped their interest in Wilfried Zaha – because Theo Walcott is set to sign a new deal.

The Gunners were keen to land the Crystal Palace youngster as a replacement for Walcott, who was set to leave the club at the end of his contract this summer.

But reports have emerged from the Emirates that the former Southampton winger is ready to agree a new deal, having had various requirements met, and that has opened the door for Manchester United to sign the Eagles star.

Arsenal remain in the market for other targets this January though with Demba Ba, David Villa and Arda Turan all linked to the north London club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You