Jump to content

Chelsea Match Chat

Discuss the fixtures and the results whoever Chelsea are up against.


1,361 topics in this forum

  1. Chelsea vs Hull 1 2 3 4 15

    • 262 replies
    • 10.1k views
  2. Liverpool vs Chelsea 1 2 3 4 21

    • 370 replies
    • 12.6k views
    • 188 replies
    • 9.1k views
  3. Chelsea vs Ipswich 1 2 3 4 13

    • 219 replies
    • 9.4k views
  4. Chelsea vs Stoke City 1 2 3 4 15

    • 260 replies
    • 10.4k views
    • 259 replies
    • 11.6k views
  5. Southend vs Chelsea 1 2 3 4 23

    • 399 replies
    • 17.9k views
  6. Fulham vs Chelsea 1 2 3 4 14

    • 234 replies
    • 9.6k views
  7. Chelsea vs West Brom 1 2 3 4 8

    • 129 replies
    • 6.8k views
  8. Everton vs Chelsea 1 2 3 4 12

    • 200 replies
    • 9k views
  9. Chelsea vs West Ham 1 2 3 4 9

    • 158 replies
    • 7.8k views
  10. Chelsea vs CFR Cluj 1 2 3 4

    • 71 replies
    • 4k views
  11. Bolton vs Chelsea 1 2 3 4 10

    • 170 replies
    • 8.7k views
  12. Chelsea vs. Arsenal 1 2 3 4 13

    • 231 replies
    • 11.8k views
  13. Bordeaux vs Chelsea 1 2 3 4 10

    • 171 replies
    • 8.1k views
  14. Chelsea vs Newcastle 1 2 3 4 5

    • 89 replies
    • 4.8k views
  15. West Brom vs Chelsea 1 2 3 4 6

    • 102 replies
    • 5.4k views
  16. Chelsea vs Burnley 1 2 3 4 11

    • 194 replies
    • 8.4k views
  17. Blackburn vs Chelsea 1 2 3 4 7

    • 108 replies
    • 5.9k views
  18. Roma vs Chelsea 1 2 3 4 6

    • 92 replies
    • 5.6k views
  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Posts

    • Next season with estevao arrive we need to sell some winger and I believe that noni has the better market
    • If we sign him its to replace Mudryk in the conference league squad, occasional sub appearance in PL for final 10 minutes. I am interested in almost any player at the right price, if we're talking £20m and he's coming in on only a small raise on £50k pw (supposedly his current salary) then why not. If we're talking money that isn't back of the sofa money then it would be mad to sign him.
    • Madueke is very inconsequent Also If we buy garnacho, Madueke is the one I think will go
    • But no where near as bad as Garnacho! If you dislike Madueke, you will despise Garnacho.
    • Madueke is very selfish
    • Garnacho is worse in every measurable way, much less of an all round player than Madueke, much more selfish. THAN MADUEKE. Very strange signing if we go after him, only makes any sense if its a mutual backscratch with them buying from the infamous Chelsea bomb squad.
    • Above madueke yes
    • Does Garnacho get into the team ahead of Neto or Sancho or even Madueke rn? its not like we don't have options for the wing + we have Paez and Estevan coming in July.  Why's the board prioritizing Garnacho, Gittens or Tel over a striker or even a GK
    • We need a striker to complete/rotate with Jackson and the new striker needs to be of a different type too. On the other hand, our level of play including against weaker opposition at the SB suggests we need a lot more than that. Like I stated before, I like Garnacho at the right price, but he's also very raw at 21yo. His ceiling is a hell lot higher than Mudryk's and he can press high with intensity, so a huge upgrade.
    • We need a striker now and not just in Sommer‼️‼️
    • Already see some of our fans getting excited about Matt Law saying we’re “assessing midfield options,” but any move we do make there will almost surely be Ugo returning from loan. We won’t want to fuck with Strasbourg’s season and piss their fans off even more than they already are with BlueCo by recalling Santos. Don’t think anyone should get excited as if we’re going to go out there and buy some great new midfielder.
    • Matt Law : Chelsea looking at Garnacho, Tel, Gittens and assessing if they'll bid. Also looking at strikers for the summer - can accelerate if a deal is possible now. Delap and Sesko on the list, no Vlahovic. 
  • Player Threads

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You