Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Mhsc said:

Amazing how many people on here do not understand this.

I don’t think Boehly is involved (or trusted to be involved by the people with real power) in the sporting side anymore. He is lucky to still have a job and probably got a serious dressing down a few times over his performance in that role.

I don't think it's they don't understand anymore, it now feels like it's an agenda against the club by our own fans on purpose 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

Egbali and Boehly will be our new CB pair soon.

Wait, I’m going to create a twitter account until the end of the day and write a twit, claiming that I have an info about how Chelsea is selling Stamford Bridge to Leyton Orient. 
 

Can you please repost it here with some new irracional Boehly and Egbaly accusations, since that is all you do 0/24 !?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Vesper said:

wrong Barca target

I do not want Kessie anyway


Ronald Araújo 
Alejandro Balde 
Frenkie de Jong    
Ousmane Dembélé 

Depends on his price / salary. If he is cheap, would add experience / depth to the midfield. Kessie is already excellent at pressing from midfield and pushing up to press in the attacking line, has a rock solid injury record, in general just a solid player. Could play in a 2 or a 3 midfield. We need numbers so I'm not averse to it tbh, although obviously wouldn't be the most exciting signing in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boehly is still the owner right? He’s made himself the face of the club and will have to bear the brunt of the discontent if things don’t go well. Even if he’s stepped down from being directly involved in transfers , the new person or people were presumably hired by him and answer to him. If they aren’t good enough for their job it’s on him too. He’s single handedly more responsible for our current plight than anyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LegenTerry said:

Wait, I’m going to create a twitter account until the end of the day and write a twit, claiming that I have an info about how Chelsea is selling Stamford Bridge to Leyton Orient. 
 

Can you please repost it here with some new irracional Boehly and Egbaly accusations, since that is all you do 0/24 !?

How about you stop being so sensitive and take a joke? The report is also from a legit reporter not some itk guy, whenever that's true or not is another case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lucio said:

Boehly is still the owner right? He’s made himself the face of the club and will have to bear the brunt of the discontent if things don’t go well. Even if he’s stepped down from being directly involved in transfers , the new person or people were presumably hired by him and answer to him. If they aren’t good enough for their job it’s on him too. He’s single handedly more responsible for our current plight than anyone. 

He was the public face of a consortium that bought and now own the club. He himself owns a %, but Clearlake Capital (cofounded by Eghbali) are the main owners and (real) decision makers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mhsc said:

He was the public face of a consortium that bought and now own the club. He himself owns a %, but Clearlake Capital (cofounded by Eghbali) are the main owners and (real) decision makers. 

Ah I see 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the hell’s going on with our shirt deal, btw? As awful as this deal with Stake sounds, how have we STILL not formalized something yet? Having new signings holding up last season’s shirt is some amateur hour shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Mhsc said:

He was the public face of a consortium that bought and now own the club. He himself owns a %, but Clearlake Capital (cofounded by Eghbali) are the main owners and (real) decision makers. 

Clearlake own 60% of the club. The rest of the shares belong to Boehly, Walter, Wyss and some smaller investors together. Of this 40% group Boehly has by far the largest personal stake (rumored to be around 20%) as well as the right to represent these 'silent partners' in any decision making process.

According to multiple reliable reports the voting rights between Clearlake and Boehly's group are split 50/50, despite the shares being 60/40 in favor of Clearlake.

So whichever way you put it Boehly has a massive say in what happens around the club and is not just a 'public face'. Which is okay, as long as he's learnt (and continues to learn) from previous mistakes. I for one think it's a sign of some decent progress that he's taken a step back and is trusting people with more football knowledge to do stuff in his stead, but of course the jury is still out. 

Edited by Jype
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You