Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Thor said:

That isn't the issue. 

Its when we go and pay 120 mil and then everyone here acts like they were crazy for paying 120 mil, when in fact the fans were calling for heads if it wasn't paid. 

 

The same people who whinge about us overspending on certain players were the ones screaming for them to just sign and stop worrying about the numbers. 

I can understand no longer signing CBs, mids since we have spent on so many already

but the only strikers signed in the last two years have been Aubameyang (short term dud ) and Jackson (relatively cheap, not ready). Clearlake haven’t invested in a top striker yet. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Strike said:

I can understand no longer signing CBs, mids since we have spent on so many already

but the only strikers signed in the last two years have been Aubameyang (short term dud ) and Jackson (relatively cheap, not ready). Clearlake haven’t invested in a top striker yet. 

 

Vic had one great season at Napoli. The rest have been middle of the pack. A lot of other strikers in the Serie A have put up his numbers if not better and done it at a similar/younger age. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Thor said:

Vic had one great season at Napoli. The rest have been middle of the pack. A lot of other strikers in the Serie A have put up his numbers if not better and done it at a similar/younger age. 

Osimhen's done it in multiple leagues, and his stats have improved year on year, aside from one that involved him needing facial reconstruction. Look at his age too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

Osimhen's done it in multiple leagues, and his stats have improved year on year, aside from one that involved him needing facial reconstruction. Look at his age too.

No he hasn't he has one season with more than 20 goals and has now reverted back to his normal level. At 120m he is a complete waste of money.

Edited by TheHulk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheHulk said:

The striker market is trash right now, find whatever stop gaps we can find until something good shows up, we can't afford to get it wrong again especially when we talking about big money transfer.

How long do we wait for "something good"? wasn't Osimhen meant to be the something good? We need a striker now we need to try and get the best we can for now tbh 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

How long do we wait for "something good"? wasn't Osimhen meant to be the something good? We need a striker now we need to try and get the best we can for now tbh 

Who knows, might take a while until something else shows up, Oshimhen is a more polished Lukaku, he offers less than Jackson in the build up, if he will have a goal drought bet his thread will be very active with many crying he doesn't do anything. For 120m this guy is a waste of money, if he was 60-70m would be okay. 

I'd take the risk on Guirassy but think Bayern are after him. Hope we ain't touching this Gyokeres dud either.

Edited by TheHulk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheHulk said:

No he hasn't he has one season with more than 20 goals and has now reverted back to his normal level. At 120m he is a complete waste of money.

In league football, he has. Have you actually watch Napoli at all this season, as you'd know what the real issue is.

£108m is his supposed release clause.  Out of all the CF targets, he be the best value in terms of what he offers and his profile.

1 hour ago, YorkshireBlue said:

How long do we wait for "something good"? wasn't Osimhen meant to be the something good? We need a striker now we need to try and get the best we can for now tbh 

Some people change their minds more than the British weather changes. Let's get another stop gap (Jackson #2), complain that he isn't delivering, and repeat the cycle until our bottom half status is cemented. 

Edited by LAM09
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

How long do we wait for "something good"? wasn't Osimhen meant to be the something good? We need a striker now we need to try and get the best we can for now tbh 

I think it is telling that other top clubs have cooled their interest in Osimhen. It is a lot of a club's budget on a player that might come good, or be another Timo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LAM09 said:

In league football, he has. Have you actually watch Napoli at all this season, as you'd know what the real issue is.

£108m is his supposed release clause.  Out of all the CF targets, he be the best value in terms of what he offers and his profile.

Some people change their minds more than the British weather changes. Let's get another stop gap (Jackson #2), complain that he isn't delivering, and repeat the cycle until our bottom half status is cemented. 

His goal scoring record outside of that one season is very mid level... And he has done it in very average leagues. Jackson is a better player than him. He is. 

VO ain't carrying the ball up the field and opening up the game like NJ is. Sure NJ has missed some sitters, but they are more highlighted because of how poor we've been as a club - and those big chances created are very misleading. Sure - some strikers would have put more in the net, but its more so down to return to the mean stuff rather than Jackson as a player. He isn't always going to miss tap ins and that. 

I'm all for getting another striker, but VO isn't the sure fire thing like Kane and Haaland. Don't need to try and force it IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Thor said:

His goal scoring record outside of that one season is very mid level... And he has done it in very average leagues. Jackson is a better player than him. He is. 

VO ain't carrying the ball up the field and opening up the game like NJ is. Sure NJ has missed some sitters, but they are more highlighted because of how poor we've been as a club - and those big chances created are very misleading. Sure - some strikers would have put more in the net, but its more so down to return to the mean stuff rather than Jackson as a player. He isn't always going to miss tap ins and that. 

I'm all for getting another striker, but VO isn't the sure fire thing like Kane and Haaland. Don't need to try and force it IMO.

I personally find this characteristic not very useful for strikers at big clubs... perhaps even detrimental for the team. There should be several more qualified players for that job at an elite outfit. For me Jackson's a bit of a ball hog, which is the one thing I dislike about his game. Also, as and if we improve, and become respectful again, he will have less and less opportunity for these runs.
xG is indeed relative and most, if not all, strikers have wild fluctuations in their xG throughout their careers.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...