Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Clockwork said:

Lol why did this thread became a England NT thread?
 

Anyway I think it is nuts to sign a player that can’t pass a physical.

Seems like it's a minor surgery for Kounde.

Most likely the club will wait for him to recover and snap him up in time for pre-season. 

Until then, silence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Hermione said:

De Ligt and Gvardiol works as well.

Both probably would works well. Gvardiol with his pace and ball-playing, and De Ligt with his leadership and aerial presence. The problem though both of them would be very expensive, especially De Ligt. 

Edited by Blues Forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still not entirely convinced about Kounde.

Kept a closer eye on him after last summer and quite frankly I don’t see him as the player which he seems to be made out to be.

Looks a decent CB but I am not really sure if it would be right to say he is an outstanding one now or could be in the future.

On De Ligt though - 100% yes though, if thats possible and not as expensive as maybe first thought, do it. His age, profile, experience, mentality and leadership skills at his age, to think he will only keep on adding to what he’s already achieved so far in his career in terms of the improvements he’s made and levels he’s played at, I think its a no brainer really.

Edited by OneMoSalah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

Still not entirely convinced about Kounde.

Kept a closer eye on him after last summer and quite frankly I don’t see him as the player which he seems to be made out to be.

Looks a decent CB but I am not really sure if it would be right to say he is an outstanding one now or could be in the future.

On De Ligt though - 100% yes though, if thats possible and not as expensive as maybe first thought, do it. His age, profile, experience, mentality and leadership skills at his age, to think he will only keep on adding to what he’s already achieved so far in his career in terms of the improvements he’s made and levels he’s played at, I think its a no brainer really.

Kounde always has been an absolute non-starter. Would be an absolute brainfart masterclass from the board like so many before

Overrated player, rash, inconsistent, has regressed over the past season (added getting red cards to his game), easily riled up, tiny ADD-kid.

Now we learn he is also injured and has to do surgery. Minor or not, any surgery bears risks.

Also overpriced AF. The way this saga drags on is already a bad sign. Remember Bakayoko?

The sheer number of absolute qualtiy CBs that have switched clubs while the board sat there on AC, Toni contracts running down doing diddly squat waiting for Kounde is mind blowing. The sheer incompetence by ppl whose literal job it is to do transfers and squad planning.

Just the fact that this transfer is so damn stupid makes me certain it will happen at some point. The guy is on his way here -   by the speed of it - apparently by foot. As his legs are short and broken his arrival may still take a while.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Tomo said:

He may aswell have told us which were and weren't by his actions.

Morata and Bakayoko got multiple chances so quite clearly were. 

He wanted to reunite with Emerson and Giroud in Italy so he quite clearly didn't mind those signings. Giroud was obviously him anyway due to his history wanting targetmen but get to that shortly.

Drinkwater, Bats and Barkley were largely ignored so safe to say they were club signings.

Zappa I think was a bit of both. Clearly a panic buy but when it got to the stage I think Antonio got lazy and went where he knew.

Our repeated links with targetmen were 100% driven by him. We didn't have any recent history of going after any (not even under Jose) yet Conte with a history of signing targetmen (Llorente, Bendtner, using Pelle in the national side) gets here and all of a sudden we're linked with all of them under the sun.

I have always been of the belief, that Conte got the same treatment as every other manager at Chelsea since Jose Mk.1 in that he was allowed to make suggestions but they would only be that. 

Imo, that window continued the theme of us only buying players in the 21-27 year old bracket unless we needed a quick patch as we are/were obsessed with only buying players with 'resale' value. Imo, Conte wanted players like Vidal and got given Baka/Drinky, Crandreva and got Zappa. Lukaku. 

The notion that he got more say on transfers than the managers around him, has never made sense to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, chelsea_4_eva said:

Hopefully our loss on the Lukaku deal wont be too big.

They do mention if it makes financial sense meaning not a big loss. 

Player swap would be awesome but I don't know. I would want barella but I don't think we have a chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we loan for Lukaku to inter for just 17m, the overall financial loss will be gargantuan. At least when measured mark-to-market. Lukaku's market value will be cut in half in the next few months just bc of his age. Even if he sets serie A on fire, no on will ever buy him.

Loan deal is beyond stupid if it does not include obligation to buy but makes sense given how braindead our board is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still don’t understand how Inter are going to play Lukaku, Lautaro, and Dybala together. 

But if we are trying to swap for anyone at Inter other than Lautaro it should only be for Skriniar or Bastoni. I’ve seen Dumfries linked but he’s shite and nowhere near Chelsea quality. De Vrij is pretty good but I think we can do much better elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Still don’t understand how Inter are going to play Lukaku, Lautaro, and Dybala together. 

But if we are trying to swap for anyone at Inter other than Lautaro it should only be for Skriniar or Bastoni. I’ve seen Dumfries linked but he’s shite and nowhere near Chelsea quality. De Vrij is pretty good but I think we can do much better elsewhere.

Chelsea quality? 

Drinkwater barkley Hudson odoi werner zyiech alonso kepa RLC lukakuu Jorginho Emerson just some examples, we have hardly been brimming with quality for a long time lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Still don’t understand how Inter are going to play Lukaku, Lautaro, and Dybala together. 

But if we are trying to swap for anyone at Inter other than Lautaro it should only be for Skriniar or Bastoni. I’ve seen Dumfries linked but he’s shite and nowhere near Chelsea quality. De Vrij is pretty good but I think we can do much better elsewhere.

 Dumfries Brozovic Barella LWB

Dybala

Lukaku Martinez

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Kong said:

Chelsea quality? 

Drinkwater barkley Hudson odoi werner zyiech alonso kepa RLC lukakuu Jorginho Emerson just some examples, we have hardly been brimming with quality for a long time lol.

Lukaku was their best player, and he is nowhere near Chelsea quality. What are on about?

I would not want any of Inter player, only if it gets rid of Lukaku I would take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...