Erling Haaland

[Jase 43,479]

10 minutes ago, King Kante said:

Be interesting to know what the actual offer was. 

That's assuming it's even true considering it's Sky...

3 minutes ago, Vesper said:

well, we value Tammy at (lolol) £50m

and CHO I am sure around £30-35m

€175m is £150m

so it was likely £65-70m cash + Tammy & CHO

at MOST is £90m cash + Tammy & CHO (Tammy at £35m, CHO at £25m)

The Sky report said we offered one or the other, not both. 

EDIT: England's Sky said Abraham OR CHO while Germany's Sky said both. Go figure...

[Vesper 30,224]

Just now, Jas said:

That's assuming it's even true considering it's Sky...

The Sky report said we offered one or the other, not both. 

then if Tammy, it was £100m to £115m cash, likely £100m

if CHO, £115m to £125m, likely £115m

[Jase 43,479]

3 minutes ago, Vesper said:

then if Tammy, it was £100m to £115m cash, likely £100m

if CHO, £115m to £125m, likely £115m

Even if that story was true, I doubt the club even offered that amount of cash to start with.

[Vesper 30,224]

2 minutes ago, Jas said:

Even if that story was true, I doubt the club even offered that amount of cash to start with.

that was based off the €175m price that so many claim is what they want

I cannot please everyone (I still say they would take €150m cash)

[Jase 43,479]

1 minute ago, Vesper said:

that was based off the €175m price that so many claim is what they want

I cannot please everyone (I still say they would take €150m cash)

I meant valuing the player for XXX amount and then offer the remaining in cash. I mean, if the club could say 100 million immediately, I highly doubt the remaining 50 million is a problem. Am sure the club would try to get Dortmund to lower their price. 

[Warning_Hazard 156]

And so it begins!

They offered 1 player plus cash. probably no where near what people are saying here, opening offer!

 

50m plus player first bid id say

[Vesper 30,224]

8 minutes ago, Jas said:

I meant valuing the player for XXX amount and then offer the remaining in cash. I mean, if the club could say 100 million immediately, I highly doubt the remaining 50 million is a problem. Am sure the club would try to get Dortmund to lower their price. 

well, all you need to do then

if you take my figure of €150m

is reduce the cash on all my posts above by £21m

simple maths

Edited July 15, 2021 by Vesper

[Pizy 18,952]

Won’t believe we’ve made an offer at all until someone reliable reports it. Ornstein or Law.

[Strike 7,494]

5 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Won’t believe we’ve made an offer at all until someone reliable reports it. Ornstein or Law.

+1 or even Romano, Fjortoft. Ignoring all of Sky's reporting on this - pretty clear after the way they were discussing the Sancho story last year they haven't got a source at Dortmund. 

[Pizy 18,952]

Sky Germany are notoriously unreliable, aren’t they?

[Jase 43,479]

Sky are backtracking now. 🤣

 

 

[Jase 43,479]

54 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Won’t believe we’ve made an offer at all until someone reliable reports it. Ornstein or Law.

 

46 minutes ago, Strike said:

+1 or even Romano, Fjortoft. Ignoring all of Sky's reporting on this - pretty clear after the way they were discussing the Sancho story last year they haven't got a source at Dortmund. 

Well, here's your Romano update aka non-update...

 

[Pizy 18,952]

Honeslty don’t know what we’re waiting for. The season starts in almost exactly 1 month, right? It’s pretty much common knowledge now that they’ll sell for the right money. We know how beneficial it would be to have him in for a whole preseason. So what’s the hold up? 
 

Like @Jas has been saying, perhaps we have to sell a bunch of players to fund the move. But how could that be when we’ve just received mega payouts for winning the CL and finishing top 4? Surely we’re more flush with cash than ever before?

Regardless, the longer this goes on the higher the likelihood some other big club wakes up and makes an offer. City, Real Madrid, someone…

Feels like we have to move soon or miss out…

[Strike 7,494]

15 minutes ago, Jas said:

Sky are backtracking now. 🤣

 

 

Hopping off the Sky bandwagon. They are going to milk this for what its worth -  do a whole 'Will he, wont he' when there is no bid/ no movement happening

[Milan 17,959]

If Haaland stays, the race will be open to many clubs next summer -  €75m release clause.

This is now or never for Chelsea. If we are to sign him, it will have to be this summer. Next summer there will be huge, huge competition. This is up to board. But seeing our youth being sold here and there makes you wonder.

[Jase 43,479]

5 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Honeslty don’t know what we’re waiting for. The season starts in almost exactly 1 month, right? It’s pretty much common knowledge now that they’ll sell for the right money. We know how beneficial it would be to have him in for a whole preseason. So what’s the hold up? 
 

Like @Jas has been saying, perhaps we have to sell a bunch of players to fund the move. But how could that be when we’ve just received mega payouts for winning the CL and finishing top 4? Surely we’re more flush with cash than ever before?

Why do people seemingly assume that just because we won the Champions League and we finished in the Top 4, we have all that money to spend on transfers? I mean, it's not news that the club still have other costs to bear and just like any other club, we are also impacted financially due to the pandemic. On top of that, think the club also want to strengthen other areas and hence come the conundrum - do we bomb what essentially would be our entire transfer budget on one player (transfer fee + agent fees + wages etc) or do we spend that money on a few players instead in those other areas etc? The club's interest on Haaland is not a secret at this point but think it has also been partly overplayed, overdramatized (whatever the right word is) by the media. The media, the journalists seem to think Roman has a bottomless pit of money going by some of the reports. 

[Pizy 18,952]

9 minutes ago, Jas said:

Why do people seemingly assume that just because we won the Champions League and we finished in the Top 4, we have all that money to spend on transfers? I mean, it's not news that the club still have other costs to bear and just like any other club, we are also impacted financially due to the pandemic. On top of that, think the club also want to strengthen other areas and hence come the conundrum - do we bomb what essentially would be our entire transfer budget on one player (transfer fee + agent fees + wages etc) or do we spend that money on a few players instead in those other areas etc? The club's interest on Haaland is not a secret at this point but think it has also been partly overplayed, overdramatized (whatever the right word is) by the media. The media, the journalists seem to think Roman has a bottomless pit of money going by some of the reports. 

Enough with your sense and realism. Bomb it all on Haaland. 👍🏼

[Vesper 30,224]

 

Edited July 15, 2021 by Vesper

[whats happening 1,621]

3 hours ago, Milan said:

If Haaland stays, the race will be open to many clubs next summer -  €75m release clause.

This is now or never for Chelsea. If we are to sign him, it will have to be this summer. Next summer there will be huge, huge competition. This is up to board. But seeing our youth being sold here and there makes you wonder.

this is obvious for everyone except for our board it looks like.

[Jase 43,479]

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/57853877

According to BBC, Guardiola has been monitoring the Haaland situation and Dortmund are gonna dig their heels in by rejecting any offers for Haaland, especially after already losing Sancho this summer.