Laylabelle 9,535 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 The interview was with Chelsea TV, I think. Don't think he could just ignore it. Could have certainly said less than he did though.He's dropped way more hints other times before when been asked.Maybe this time is a good signIn point talking about fighting spirt need to show it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 He's dropped way more hints other times before when been asked.Maybe this time is a good signIn point talking about fighting spirt need to show itLike Choo Choo alluded to earlier, there's really no point in the players saying they still have the manager's back. Gotta prove it on the pitch and if the recent results and performances are anything to go by, then they suggest the opposite. Even if they don't want to play for the manager, then play for everyone else associated with the club. Show some bloody commitment, desire and passion for goodness sake! Laylabelle and Rmpr 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,317 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Passionhttps://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=911973545517978&id=628797043835631&refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rivalsfootball.net%2Fchelsea%2Findex.php&_rdr zyzz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Like Choo Choo alluded to earlier, there's really no point in the players saying they still have the manager's back. Gotta prove it on the pitch and if the recent results and performances are anything to go by, then they suggest the opposite. Even if they don't want to play for the manager, then play for the everyone else associated with the club. Show some bloody commitment, desire and passion for goodness sake!exactly what we said to them and especially Lampard before they got AVB sacked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,535 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Like Choo Choo alluded to earlier, there's really no point in the players saying they still have the manager's back. Gotta prove it on the pitch and if the recent results and performances are anything to go by, then they suggest the opposite. Even if they don't want to play for the manager, then play for the everyone else associated with the club. Show some bloody commitment, desire and passion for goodness sake!That's what annoys me about the whole not playing for a manager.We can't exactly go to work and think nah don't get on with the manager so gana do sod all.They need to grow up and get a grip if that is the case!fans make the effort to turn up they need to do the same to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laeth 527 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Passionhttps://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=911973545517978&id=628797043835631&refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rivalsfootball.net%2Fchelsea%2Findex.php&_rdrNot just us who hates Ivanovic then . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 We're not at Madrid or Barcelona level tbh.Yep. Some of the players that start for us wouldn't make their bench.True, but Klopp is just another Chelsea experiment. Like Peace was just talking about identity above, what exactly do we want from this team/any manager? We seem to hire managers that don't seem to get the best out of any squad we've built. Mourinho can't unlock Hazard's potential, AVB couldn't make Hazard/Mata/Oscar click together, Scolari couldn't bring the South American flare to Chelsea. What exactly are we building here? Let's be frank, our next coach won't last longer than 3 seasons, let's accept that.. So what's the long term strategy exactly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,535 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 We just don't seem to know who/want we want.hire a new manager and no doubt all go the same as before and before know it looking all over again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! LDN Blue 7,903 Posted October 4, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted October 4, 2015 You know what I hate about this place? There are posts here that, despite you being on one side of the fence, ever so slightly make you change your perception of what is and what should be. (I love it though, shout out to the quality of posts in here once you filter out the garbage lol)The magic of Mourinho is leaving me & that makes me sad to be honest. I guess this is how Liverpool fans felt when Dalglish didn't live up to his heights the first time around.But I'll still refrain from calling him a 'disgrace' or a 'cunt'. Like it or not, he's a very important part of our history and deserves the same respect. Kieran., Blue Colored Sky, Azpinator and 5 others 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,317 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Not just us who hates Ivanovic then . Safe to say quite a few Chels wont be inviting him for dinner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! lionsden 4,689 Posted October 4, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted October 4, 2015 What is one supposed to say about Peace's post though? He says stability is established by the club having an identity in terms of playing style and then he goes on to use Barcelona as an example.In my opinion, the two worst examples to use in football are Barcelona and Alex Ferguson, because there's nothing like them.No. The point of his post is that a well defined and implemented identity is what gives a club stability and not necessarily the ability to retain the same manager for many years. A good example of how the board have contributed greatly to our lack of identity is how they invested tons into the academy and youth players with the promise of one day producing first team players out of the crop and changing the style of play for more attacking and expansive one and that was reflected in the type of players we were buying but then what did they did the most confusing thing ever by employing a manager who is the very opposite of what the club is aiming to achieve to oversee the project.That's just poor planning and implementation of policy.they are all over the place with what it is they really aim to achieve.You will never see well run clubs with an identity like Bayern and barca buy players and hire managers who go against the clubs policy/identity. The decisions from which manager to hire to which players to buy etc are done with great levelnof purpose at these clubs. Belgiannutt, Peace., laura90 and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Safe to say quite a few Chels wont be inviting him for dinner And those who do will have ulterior motives Blue_Fox_ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Fox_ 2,086 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 We just don't seem to know who/want we want.hire a new manager and no doubt all go the same as before and before know it looking all over againI'm fairly sure we in the forum don't know, i doubt the board and Roman don't know what they want to do right now, if so....god help us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,317 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 And those who do will have ulterior motives You mean his big arse ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Fox_ 2,086 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 You mean his big arse ?More like...they'll have him for dinner. Fulham Broadway 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tautvix 1,321 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 That's our manager. When we win, he claims to be the best. When we lose, the team is bad, the referees are awful, but he still claims to be the best.Did you even watched yesterday's interview? Jose said he is the best coach Chelsea has even had and it would be useless to argue with that. I can't say I like what he said but it's truth. And these claims "when we win Jose claims himself to be the best" is complete false. He never says that. I don't know what he thinks but he always praises the players. Watch his interviews after winning titles then... stroey, Jokesy, Fulham Broadway and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DYC. 7,542 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 True, but Klopp is just another Chelsea experiment. Like Peace was just talking about identity above, what exactly do we want from this team/any manager? We seem to hire managers that don't seem to get the best out of any squad we've built. Mourinho can't unlock Hazard's potential, AVB couldn't make Hazard/Mata/Oscar click together, Scolari couldn't bring the South American flare to Chelsea. What exactly are we building here? Let's be frank, our next coach won't last longer than 3 seasons, let's accept that.. So what's the long term strategy exactly?Yo Conficius, AVB was before that trio were at the club.Lionsden is spot on with that latest post. It's the lack of vision that hurts any kind of stability. You needed a spoon but you got a knife. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jokesy 53 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Not defending Fabregas lack of form but I'm surprised most people actually think his role is DM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmk108 1,186 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 No. The point of his post is that a well defined and implemented identity is what gives a club stability and not necessarily the ability to retain the same manager for many years. A good example of how the board have contributed greatly to our lack of identity is how they invested tons into the academy and youth players with the promise of one day producing first team players out of the crop and changing the style of play for more attacking and expansive one and that was reflected in the type of players we were buying but then what did they did the most confusing thing ever by employing a manager who is the very opposite of what the club is aiming to achieve to oversee the project.That's just poor planning and implementation of policy.they are all over the place with what it is they really aim to achieve.You will never see well run clubs with an identity like Bayern and barca buy players and hire managers who go against the clubs policy/identity. The decisions from which manager to hire to which players to buy etc are done with great levelnof purpose at these clubs.Just a little thing about your Bayern comment. Pep is a manager that's against the Bayern identity. That's why there's many Bayern supporters that don't like him, even though of the success they've had with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Yo Conficius, AVB was before that trio were at the club.Lionsden is spot on with that latest post. It's the lack of vision that hurts any kind of stability. You needed a spoon but you got a knife.Yeah I just read through, definitely agree with him and Peace's posts. We don't have any kind of identity because of the mismatch between players and management.. That what happens when you go after names as opposed to merit lol. I.e. Falcao = name DYC., Stats and Muzchap 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.