Jump to content

Roman Abramovich Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Pizy said:

It seems so shortsighted and plain dumb for companies to “suspend” their sponsorships when the process of finding a new owner will maybe take a couple of weeks. What’s the point? Chelsea FC, the actual football club, haven’t done anything to bring these companies’ reputation down. So other than a phony publicity stunt I don’t see what it accomplishes.

Any and all sponsors that jump ship during this period should never be allowed to come groveling back once things are sorted.

Very reactionary. They are risking future business by doing so. 
 

Hope we fuck Three right off once this is sorted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

 

The same Hyundai which were one of FIFA's main sponsors for the world cup in Russia and are currently again one of the main and proud FIFA sponsors for the Qatar world cup.

It's hypocrisy more than anything. I don't think anyone will complain about the likes of Trivago and Nike remaining committed on the basis that clearly the club will be changing ownership very soon, so will just keep monitoring developments for now. 

Will be interesting to know what the position of Chelsea is or can be once everything is sorted. Can the club veto out of these deals with Three and Hyundai and arrange new sponsorships?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Superblue_1986 said:

The same Hyundai which were one of FIFA's main sponsors for the world cup in Russia and are currently again one of the main and proud FIFA sponsors for the Qatar world cup.

It's hypocrisy more than anything. I don't think anyone will complain about the likes of Trivago and Nike remaining committed on the basis that clearly the club will be changing ownership very soon, so will just keep monitoring developments for now. 

Will be interesting to know what the position of Chelsea is or can be once everything is sorted. Can the club veto out of these deals with Three and Hyundai and arrange new sponsorships?

 

9 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

Very reactionary. They are risking future business by doing so. 
 

Hope we fuck Three right off once this is sorted. 

Add Hyundai. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s not like we have a sex predator or a club-wide scandal that would damage the reputation of the shirt sponsor by mere association. There’s no right minded person in the world who sees the Hyundai logo on a Chelsea players’ sleeve and thinks “I’m not buying a Hyundai because they support Chelsea!”

It’s just performative bullshit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MoroccanBlue said:

What successful consortiums have there been?

Real, Barca, Bayern, Pool (FSG is a consortium) for starters, there is no single human owner for any of the 4

also, a shedload of yank teams (baseball, football, basketball, hockey, especially baseball) have consortium ownership

The Boston Red Sox (FSG which Stands for Fenway Sports Group, Fenway being their legendary old old stadium), the New York Yankees ( Yankee Global Enterprises, an LLC), and the the LA Dodgers (Boehly is part of that consortium) are great examples of very successful teams who have no single human owner

Edited by Vesper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Strike said:

 

Boehly has taken a public position against the Super League

There was an interview with this bloke linked earlier in this thread and another 30-minute one linked from that. In both of those, plus the two snippets linked here, I find Boehly to be impressive. That said I don't interpret what he says about the super League to mean that he is against it. My take is that he is against trying to do anything without taking the fans, the customers, along with you. These comments therefore would not rule out his being part of attempts to sell a repackaged version of the super League to European football fans at some point in the future.

If the bid by his consortium moves forward then we can expect media outlets to follow up on his ideas about the super League and other matters. It will be interesting to read more about his thinking.

Edited by OhForAGreavsie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, milka said:

FNoVQhgWYAAefOn?format=jpg&name=medium

bought Chelsea for £140m spent billions sold for free and left us as the kings of the world debt free. Proper Chels.

that is way harsh for us pre August 2003

we already had 3 European trophies (Arse still only has 2 total after 137 years of footie)

and 12 overall

6 of those were from May 1997 through August 2000: 2 FA Cups, a CS, a League Cup, a UEFA Cup Winners Cup, and a UEFA Super Cup (beating Real Madrid, a team we have NEVER lost any game to, in August 1998)

Edited by Vesper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

Emma Hayes won pundit of the year a week/ten days ago. :)

she is by far the best female footie pundit out there, brilliant, I am sure she could manage a topflight men's team

would take her over some re-tread dregs like Alan Pardew (5 wins in his last 40 topflight games, 10 in his last 65) any day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delia Smith slams Chelsea and admits she loved Norwich fans' "dirty" chant

🤬

Chelsea fans sung Roman Abramovich's name at Carrow Road despite the Russian Oligarch being sanctioned by the UK government in the wake of Ukraine's invasion

Norwich owner Delia Smith invites recruitment chief to dinner to celebrate  win over Manchester City | Daily Mail Online

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/Chelsea-roman-abramovich-delia-smith-26449669

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Vesper said:

Delia Smith slams Chelsea and admits she loved Norwich fans' "dirty" chant

🤬

Chelsea fans sung Roman Abramovich's name at Carrow Road despite the Russian Oligarch being sanctioned by the UK government in the wake of Ukraine's invasion

Norwich owner Delia Smith invites recruitment chief to dinner to celebrate  win over Manchester City | Daily Mail Online

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/Chelsea-roman-abramovich-delia-smith-26449669

Tbf she's not the only one to come out and say it..Tuchel has come and addressed it but that's because fans chanted his name during a clap for Ukraine which was dumb dumb 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Vesper said:

that is way harsh for us pre August 2003

we already had 3 European trophies (Arse still only has 2 total after 137 years of footie)

and 12 overall

6 of those were from May 1997 through August 2000: 2 FA Cups, a CS, a League Cup, a UEFA Cup Winners Cup, and a UEFA Super Cup (beating Real Madrid, a team we have NEVER lost any game to, in August 1998)

I guess they were referring mainly  Premier League and CL not  domestic cups like  FA and Carling . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Laylabelle said:

Tbf she's not the only one to come out and say it..Tuchel has come and addressed it but that's because fans chanted his name during a clap for Ukraine which was dumb dumb 

Today is going to be infinitely worse. The last couple of games have been away, this is a home game being shown on Sky Sports.

I think the Roman Abramovich chant goes beyond support and appreciation of Roman, it's almost now in an act of defiance against everyone who seems to be attacking the club right now because it's so provocative at present.

For me personally, I would prefer it not being chanted at present and we just focus on supporting the team. There will be a better time and place in the future to show appreciation to Roman. But things could start to turn a bit more toxic today I feel as frustrations could start to boil over regarding the treatment of the club.

It's ironic though the number of journalists that are criticising and degrading the club - they have a right not to watch if they're as disgusted as they're writing would suggest but they will all be watching today's game, many likely will even be at the game.

Sky Sports will know what is in store too and they'll be secretly loving it. They could easily have decided this week to switch to a different 2pm game today to air but this is the one they want because it's highly controversial (with Newcastle being the visitors an extra backdrop to the story with their new ownership). We'll no doubt all have to put up with the likes of Jamie Carragher (stand up guy spitting at a kid because he was getting wound up) and what appears a more increasingly politically driven Gary Neville who's always happy to flap his gums, give their 2 cents for what it's worth (completely worthless in my opinion).

From a media perspective we'll get massacred today. We can just hope the boys are motivated for getting 3 points and moving us closer to a guaranteed top 4 position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...