Jump to content

John Terry: Racist slur?


LDN Blue
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 984
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

He saved England's arse shit load of times in the last EURO yet they still charge him...would've been interesting to see how nicely would England do if it wasn't for JT.

same with Ashley..the rest of England hate JT,Ashley and Lamps but heaven help them when they have to try and cope without them. they may not be able to win tournaments with them but they would get humiliated without them. that time is coming..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Terry is clearly not a racist.

Can he be called a racist if he is cleared in a court of law by a chief magistrate? No.

Can he be called a racist if Robbie di Matteo and Roy Hodgson still call upon him for Chelsea and England? Certainly not.

Can he be called a racist if a black colleague and friend gives evidence in his defence? Of course not.

Can he be called a racist if he maintains great friendships with the black players in the Chelsea and England squads? No way.

Can he be called a racist if the quality of his character is testified by the likes of Frank Lampard and Gary Cahill; two of the most professional players in the Chelsea set-up? Definitely not.

Why would Terry be allowed to play for club and country if his coaches thought he was a racist? Because they don't think he is. Note it was Rio that was dropped by Hogdson, because he knows Terry is innocent. It isn't in his character.

This is just a case of the FA trying to screw over our Captain, Leader and Legend.

They can go and fuck themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

The CPS have clearly fucked up here. making a habit of it now with the bloke who tweeted he was going to bomb the airport as a joke.

Even ex Chels paul Elliott of Kick it Out has said he hopes nothing like this comes to court again.

All this makes me respect Capello more and more. His resignation from the England job becuase he could see they were picking on Terry is commendable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Terry is clearly not a racist.

Can he be called a racist if he is cleared in a court of law by a chief magistrate? No.

Can he be called a racist if Robbie di Matteo and Roy Hodgson still call upon him for Chelsea and England? Certainly not.

Can he be called a racist if a black colleague and friend gives evidence in his defence? Of course not.

Can he be called a racist if he maintains great friendships with the black players in the Chelsea and England squads? No way.

Can he be called a racist if the quality of his character is testified by the likes of Frank Lampard and Gary Cahill; two of the most professional players in the Chelsea set-up? Definitely not.

Why would Terry be allowed to play for club and country if his coaches thought he was a racist? Because they don't think he is. Note it was Rio that was dropped by Hogdson, because he knows Terry is innocent. It isn't in his character.

This is just a case of the FA trying to screw over our Captain, Leader and Legend.

They can go and fuck themselves.

I don't think the FA are charging him for being racist, they're charging for giving the league a bad image with all the cussing or smth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they're doing it for that reason, Chelsea games next season will consist of Petr Cech and Juan Mata only, as they're the only players not to give the refs grief.

In reality they should be charging the tosser who filed a formal complaint, some off duty cop it was. Call up Barton and recall Vinnie and organize a little rebuke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they're doing it for that reason, Chelsea games next season will consist of Petr Cech and Juan Mata only, as they're the only players not to give the refs grief.

I assume you didn't watch Spain's match yesterday when Mata almost hit the ref? :lol:

In all seriousness, if the FA is charging JT for the image of the league then they should charge that cunt Anton first because he was clearly provoking Terry and has admitted to using offensive words first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if Terry is charged for bad language, so should Anton Ferdinand...

It's the same old 'double standards'

Whenever it is white v black - it's always an issue and normally the black person is favoured - e.g. positive discrimination. Like when the Labour idiot said "if there is a black and white person equally able to do the job (when interviewing), the black person should get the job.) - This is ridiculous, it's positive discrimination based on colour - exactly WHAT we want to eradicate. Skin colour should have nothing to do with it... This was a footballing incident, the REF didn't care, so why should the FA - all this 'glory' hunting is driving me mad and making English Football a laughing stock...

I have a balance of brown, black and white friends - (some prefer brown to black) and all of them agree this is a farce...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You