Jump to content

Frank Lampard


DavidEU
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have to be honest, this is getting pathetic. Its obvious Lampards going, deal with it. Roman is a smart guy, hes always done whats best fo Chelsea so I am 100% behind him for this. Sure hes done a lot for the club but didn't AVB not try and reduce him to a squad player last season and he started throwing the toys out of the pram? Its only right that someone younger like Oscar or Kevin get the amount of playing time Lamps gets right now next season. Hes still useful but so are players like Luka Modric, Joao Moutinho, Fernandinho, etc who actually all suit our system too.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually like Dan Levene and find some of his musings and articles to be insightful and thought-provoking but this is just a poor letter.

He spends much of it telling us what Frank did do and what he represents to the fans and very little (if any) explaining where he fits into the squad next year. Yes we have an emotional attachment with Lamps, but my emotional attachment to the club is far greater and I think we're better next year with other players filling his position.

A lot of usually normal supporters/journalists are coming off a bit crazy on the Lampard issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Utd have a policy of 1 year contracts for players over 30, it's a good thing according to the media. It's funny how the story is different with us. I think Lampard is a Chelsea legend, and I will be sad to see him go. However, when it comes to things like this, and the "loyalty" word gets thrown around, let's not forget that Lampard has already been financially compensated for his past performances. The new contract is for future performances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank's been good for Chelsea, Chelsea have been very good for Frank. All things end including his contract. I would like to see him get the record, I'd be just as glad to see Tambling keep hold of it and I would be delighted to see someone smash it. We should liek and respect our players and they us and the club.

This is the best club on the planet and players will inevitably come and go - the club is the most important part though. I think Frank has done his time and done it admirably but I fear next season would be a season too far and I would hate to see him fail in any way for his benefit but more importantly the club. He won't be forgotten and there might even be a job for him when he finishes his playing career elsewhere (hoped it might be Rangers but that won't happen) but he is just a small part of our lengthening and improving history

Post of the week. :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People have to realize that the reason he's not getting offered a new contract is not because anyone thinks he's not good enough, but rather to pay a 35 year old 150K a week to be a bit part player is utter stupidity. You think United are paying Giggs and Scholes that much? Hello no!

I'm perfectly ok with Frank leaving if he's getting that kind of money elsewhere, and perfectly fine with Chelsea not wanting to match it.

That said, I really hope he becomes top scorer before the end of the season. I was so pissed today at Frank for not getting a piece of cake hat-trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank's been good for Chelsea, Chelsea have been very good for Frank. All things end including his contract. I would like to see him get the record, I'd be just as glad to see Tambling keep hold of it and I would be delighted to see someone smash it. We should liek and respect our players and they us and the club.

This is the best club on the planet and players will inevitably come and go - the club is the most important part though. I think Frank has done his time and done it admirably but I fear next season would be a season too far and I would hate to see him fail in any way for his benefit but more importantly the club. He won't be forgotten and there might even be a job for him when he finishes his playing career elsewhere (hoped it might be Rangers but that won't happen) but he is just a small part of our lengthening and improving history

such a great post man. we should definitely appreciate the good things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank's been good for Chelsea, Chelsea have been very good for Frank. All things end including his contract. I would like to see him get the record, I'd be just as glad to see Tambling keep hold of it and I would be delighted to see someone smash it. We should liek and respect our players and they us and the club.

This is the best club on the planet and players will inevitably come and go - the club is the most important part though. I think Frank has done his time and done it admirably but I fear next season would be a season too far and I would hate to see him fail in any way for his benefit but more importantly the club. He won't be forgotten and there might even be a job for him when he finishes his playing career elsewhere (hoped it might be Rangers but that won't happen) but he is just a small part of our lengthening and improving history

post of the day :blue scalf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People have to realize that the reason he's not getting offered a new contract is not because anyone thinks he's not good enough, but rather to pay a 35 year old 150K a week to be a bit part player is utter stupidity. You think United are paying Giggs and Scholes that much? Hello no!

Mate, this is the point - if you don't think he deserves that wage (which he has by no means officially requested unless you've heard something I haven't) then you are either a poor judge of footballing ability or it is pure ageism - or in many cases, even both.

He is 34 last time I checked, & he is not this 'bit-part player' that you all want him to be just for the sake of developing your favourite new rising youngsters - who could only dream of living up to Lampard's legacy. He is first team world class quality & that is still undeniable with some of the performances he has put in recently. If these future superstars were actually better than him, they would already be in the team in his place, but they're simply not there yet, & I have no idea why anyone would choose to believe that they deserve a place in the squad for their potential instead of their current ability, over a player who themselves as well as many others will fail to eclipse for a very long time.

What's even more confusing is this continuously desperate last resort to compare him to Giggs & Scholes, which makes no sense at all, because they are both 4+ years older & they have lost their consistency along with their fitness due to age finally catching up to them.

We are talking about Frank fucking Lampard here mate, one of the most consistent players in the world for the last 10 years who continues to prove his justified place in the starting line up after returning from injury with some truly fine displays without a hint of tiring legs. This has come in a time where we have needed him most - & once again he has delivered. 194 is the number you should be looking at, not 34.

Put it this way, would you or would you not give Gerrard/Pirlo/Alonso/Xavi an extension if they were at this club? Because if not, then I can somewhat understand I guess since you clearly must be completely clueless about football, or you otherwise have become entirely disillusioned by your ideals of effervescent youth/too much footy manager. But if you would actually give any one of those players a contract, then how the fuck can you possibly justify not giving the same thing to Frank?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mate, this is the point - if you don't think he deserves that wage (which he has by no means officially requested unless you've heard something I haven't) then you are either a poor judge of footballing ability or it is pure ageism - or in many cases, even both.

He is 34 last time I checked, & he is not this 'bit-part player' that you all want him to be just for the sake of developing your favourite new rising youngsters - who could only dream of living up to Lampard's legacy. He is first team world class quality & that is still undeniable with some of the performances he has put in recently. If these future superstars were actually better than him, they would be in the team already in his place, but they're simply not ready yet, & I have no idea why you think that they deserve a place in the squad for their potential instead of their current ability, over a player who they & many others will fail to eclipse for a very long time.

What's even more confusing is this continuously desperate last resort to compare him to Giggs & Scholes, which makes no sense at all, because they are both 4+ years older & they have lost their consistency along with their fitness due to age finally catching up to them.

We are talking about Frank fucking Lampard here mate, one of the most consistent players in the world for the last 10 years who continues to prove his justified place in the starting line up after returning from injury with some truly fine displays without a hint of tiring legs. This has come in a time where we truly have needed him mos - & once again he has delivered. 194 is the number you should be looking at, not 34.

Put it this way, would you or would you not give Gerrard/Pirlo/Alonso/Xavi an extension if they were at this club? Because if not, then I can somewhat understand I guess since you clearly must be completely clueless about football, or you otherwise have become entirely disillusioned by your ideals of effervescent youth/too much footy manager. But if you would actually give any one of those players a contract, then how the fuck can you possibly justify not giving the same thing to Frank?

Yeah, i tend to agree with the thought here. For me, he is frank lampard, and whatever he gets paid wouldn't concern me, but i would love him to stay whatever. He can definitely contribute and proved today his value, and looked extremely fit as always, and was unlucky to not score more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell me guys as you say Frank is 35, he is past it, there are better, younger players who deserve chances ahead of him, how the hell then is this old fat Lamps playing better than any other player in this team? He has that perfect instinct of everything from passing, shooting, movement,...Right now, he is in form and as a player, he plays much better than Modric, Moutinho,..would. Simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of usually normal supporters/journalists are coming off a bit crazy on the Lampard issue.

It's all getting a bit tedious to be honest. Part of me would be relieved if we'd just sell him to the LA Galaxy to have one less storyline repeated every time he has an average/above-average game or even just comes on in the last 10 minutes and scores a penalty.

The one good thing about the shitty QPR result is that we had a break from the same mewling and bleating for a few days. :banghead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You