Jump to content

Robert Lewandowski


NiclasCFC
 Share

Recommended Posts

Falcao having a number of assists doesn't mean that he excels at linking up the play.

But Lewandoski only has 3 where as Falcao has 1...

So that doesn't really back up the link play argument, in fact it makes link play almost irrelevant because the striker should be in the box waiting to score, not pissing around in the midfield :) see our current example :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH, i know strikers linking up is incredibly useful but i would be more than happy to accept a selfish striker who bangs in goals for fun and whose one concern is scoring. We play with 1 up front and 5 in midfield, i am sure we can afford to have 1 player whose major focus is scoring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH, i know strikers linking up is incredibly useful but i would be more than happy to accept a selfish striker who bangs in goals for fun and whose one concern is scoring. We play with 1 up front and 5 in midfield, i am sure we can afford to have 1 player whose major focus is scoring.

Agreed think we are getting obsessed with something that's not needed :)

I blame Torres for that though, we've forgotten what a great striker does, so everybody is focusing on the wrong things :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Lewandoski only has 3 where as Falcao has 1...

So that doesn't really back up the link play argument,

Having the number of assists and excelling in link up play doesn't mean it's the lay-off OR the final pass by the ST to his teammate to score. Sometimes it is that but not necessarily always the case. It's also about keeping the passing flowing and going by linking up with the ST whether he drops deep or say playing 1-2s in a tight area in and/or around the penalty box.

in fact it makes link play almost irrelevant because the striker should be in the box waiting to score, not pissing around in the midfield :) see our current example :)

Yes, of a course a ST's main job is to score but there are so much more to the game than just having a ST who score these days. And really, with all the talk about Lewandowski's excelling in link up play here, people think as if his goalscoring record is as bad as Torres for us. Granted he may not be a goalscoring machine like Falcao but his finishing is still good. Scoring 30 goals in 47 appearances last season and 15 in 25 this season for Dortmund is not exactly a poor goalscoring return, is it?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having the number of assists and excelling in link up play doesn't mean it's the lay-off OR the final pass by the ST to his teammate to score. Sometimes it is that but not necessarily always the case. It's also about keeping the passing flowing and going by linking up with the ST whether he drops deep or say playing 1-2s in a tight area in and/or around the penalty box.

Yes, of a course a ST's main job is to score but there are so much more to the game than just having a ST who score these days. And really, with all the talk about Lewandowski's excelling in link up play here, people think as if his goalscoring record is as bad as Torres for us. Granted he may not be a goalscoring machine like Falcao but his finishing is still good. Scoring 30 goals in 47 appearances last season and 15 in 25 this season for Dortmund is not exactly a poor goalscoring return, is it?!

So let's accept this notion that Falcao can't do link-up play and one-twos and whatnot as good as what Lewnaodwski does......is that a result of limited skill to pass the ball back to a player or the way in which their respective managers use them?

Or is it simply a faulty premise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let's accept this notion that Falcao can't do link-up play and one-twos and whatnot as good as what Lewnaodwski does......is that a result of limited skill to pass the ball back to a player or the way in which their respective managers use them?

Or is it simply a faulty premise?

Did I specifically said that Falcao can't link up the play and play 1-2s? He can but is he good at it? Not convinced.

And if someone like Falcao doesn't excel in linking up the play etc, then obviously the team playing approach would become different by playing a certain way that caters to the strengths of the ST. Perhaps, it's a similar case to what we're doing with Torres at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can never find this, but others teams do it with ease :lol:

Don't think we can ever do that, unfortunately we have shot our selves in the foot because of overspending and flop signings. That is another thing that gets missed about when we overpay for a player+ even worse when they flop(ex Torres). Other clubs take notice, when we go after their players they make sure we pay a premium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think we can ever do that, unfortunately we have shot our selves in the foot because of overspending and flop signings. That is another thing that gets missed about when we overpay for a player+ even worse when they flop(ex Torres). Other clubs take notice, when we go after their players they make sure we pay a premium.

Azpilicueta could well be the 1st player in ages that we pay a low price for a quality player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Azpilicueta could well be the 1st player in ages that we pay a low price for a quality player.


I'm racking my brain for other examples, it's very difficult. Robben for 12 million wasn't a bad investment, but that was ages ago. Sturridge is probably our best under 8 million signing in a long time, and I think Mata has probably been worth double what we paid for his transfer fee (which was still very high).

Mind you, every good investment Chelsea ever made in recent years has been nullified by Torres. At least we have Abramovich's near endless pockets to make up the difference.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overrated as hell on this forum. When he is being credited for being a good finisher, you know most are talking out of their ass. He is average-horrible finisher, and that is apparent to any Bunde viewer.

Imo he is nothing more then above average. He has good movement and is excellent in his hold-up play, i will give him that and really does well in Dortmund system. I just cannot rate him as a striker because he has way too many Kalouless moments in front of the goal. Dortmund and klopp can do better then Lewandowski, and watch them replace him with a better striker for under 5m.

For me he is going to be another Kagawa or Sahin, decent players but truly maximized and look better then they are under Klopp.

I seriously hope United do buy him for 20m+.

Lewandoski is not such a terrible finisher. but he is nothing compared to falcao, falcao has more determination to score and strength, and has superb finishing.

These are the top four finishers in 2012,

messi has 91 goals in 69 games,

ronaldo has 63 goals in 71 games,

neymar has 54 goals in 65 games and

falcao has 49 goals in 54 games

People comparing lewandoski's finishing to falcao is naive thinking. Falcao rates almost a goal per game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2241276/Robert-Lewandowski-sign-Manchester-United.html

Most probably false because Manu have 2 excellent strikers and 2 OK ones (Welbeck and Chichashito) but the interesting thing is that the quoted price is less then 24m and for that he would be a very good value for money signing.

Fixed it for you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You