Stamford Bridge Thread

[capriccioso 2,545]

55,000 is a bit steep, I reckon. We're probably at least 5 years from being able to fill that every game. Even then, I would be surprised if there weren't a few thousand empty seats when we play some League Two club in a cup tie.

[We Hate Scouse 10,326]

55,000 is a bit steep, I reckon. We're probably at least 5 years from being able to fill that every game. Even then, I would be surprised if there weren't a few thousand empty seats when we play some League Two club in a cup tie.

It would take 4-5 years to plan and build anyway.

Also I can't think of any Premier League team that would fill their stadium 100% against a League Two team in a cup tie to be honest.

[Laylabelle 9,534]

If they have sense they'll lower League game/CL etc prices.Saying that Arsenal have a big staduim and they start off kinda cheap and then go silly

[Blue Armour 4,436]

From campaign55 there concept of a potential stadium at 55k capacity, this is the best so far for a realistic way to incorporate the BPS into the proposed new stadium.

Barring the four pillars, I'd say it looks almost exactly like Stamford bridge from the outside. Nice design.

[Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067]

Wow, am I an idiot, I thought the stadium was inside the station!

[strong centreback 157]

According to property week the preferred bidder for BPS is going to be announced next week.

[Term-X 7,891]

Juan Mata on the Battersea Power Station site....

"Spectacular, the biggest brick-built building in Europe, a symbol of London, the Pink Floyd cover..."

http://www.guardian....a-bayern-munich

[hunaz10 21]

heard that Chelsea will not be granted their wish as The American Embassy which is planned to be built a mile away from Battersea thinks it is UNSAFE for the embassy to have 50000 fans walking past it every week

f***ing yanks go to your own country...! oh shit I just forgot that that you ugly fat gypsies do not have a country for urselves

[capriccioso 2,545]

With the idea that a poster had a few pages back of putting statues on the pillars of our legendary players; now that we only have two pillars, it should be Osgood and Drogba. Zola, Lamps et al, despite being brilliant for us are not in the same bracket as those two, who will always be the Kings of Chelsea Football Club.

[Slam Dunk 1,442]

Statues on top of the chimney stacks? They're over 100m in the air, how are you going to see a statue? They're an iconic part of London's skyline, they won't be changed.

[Liquidator 5,176]

Statues on top of the chimney stacks? They're over 100m in the air, how are you going to see a statue? They're an iconic part of London's skyline, they won't be changed.

we would never, ever get planning permission as well

[We Hate Scouse 10,326]

Isn't it the towers that are listed? If so that means we can't change them doesn't it, so we wouldn't be allowed anyway.

[strong centreback 157]

Isn't it the towers that are listed? If so that means we can't change them doesn't it, so we wouldn't be allowed anyway.

Technically speaking I believe they are but.... they are about a decade past their service life and need to be rebuilt as there are reports they are on the verge of falling down hence the scaffold around one of them, so even as a listed part they need to be pulled down and rebuilt.

[Slam Dunk 1,442]

Yeah the stacks will have to be rebuilt, but back to the original size/dimensions using approved materials etc. So they will look the same, just safer

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

I can see the Trophies if i will visit SB?