Edinson Cavani

[haranr 485]

Guys. We didn't give up on him. The media is bullshit. His mother doesn't know what he wants and so does is father. He will sign for us.

[Jase 43,479]

How would you know? Didn't he block you?

Are people still posting what Palmeri tweets? In case you haven't noticed, everything he says is utter BS.

Others on my timeline are still tweeting/retweeting info from him.

Can still see his tweets but been blocked from following him.

[mybodyisready 155]

Just sell Torres and bring in Bony or Benteke so we could have an all blacks frontline.

[Funkyflashman 187]

I'd still say we're in pole position. Even if he wants to go elsewhere he can't unless we are outbid, which given we are the only club to submit a formal bid so far, looks unlikely for the moment.

[Stingray 9,441]

Not actually that bothered, let him go where he wants where the money is highest.

Nothing against Cavani, nothing at all. He can't do anything here - the Napoli president is simply a greedy, greedy bastard. Fair play though, shows a bit of back-bone. And why should Napoli sell? They've truly re-established themselves in Italy for the first time in 15 years, and Cavani is a massive part of that.

Not signing him means we either invest a bit of faith in the £75 million-worth of strikers we currently have at the club - Torres, Lukaku, and Ba - or we revise our targets and bring in someone to do a decent job for a third of Cavani's price. And if Lukaku can score 17 goals for West Bromwich Albion in a rotation role, imagine what he can do for us - I'm very excited for him to be given a real chance at Chelsea.

The way we operate is almost ignoring the strikers anyway. Ba and Torres struggle because our midfield is our real attacking outlet - Mata, Hazard, Lampard and Oscar will get you 60 goals a season between them, easily. That is, in most seasons, 45-55% of our goals tally. Why spend £50 million + on another striker who probably will struggle, just like Torres, to score 20 goals a season for this team? Everyone goes on about Drogba, but he only had two seasons where he scored more than 16 goals for this club. Strikers typically struggle in Mourinho teams, as well.

Bullet dodged? Possibly.

This. Read it again people.

[TrippingStep 336]

Not actually that bothered, let him go where he wants where the money is highest.

Nothing against Cavani, nothing at all. He can't do anything here - the Napoli president is simply a greedy, greedy bastard. Fair play though, shows a bit of back-bone. And why should Napoli sell? They've truly re-established themselves in Italy for the first time in 15 years, and Cavani is a massive part of that.

Not signing him means we either invest a bit of faith in the £75 million-worth of strikers we currently have at the club - Torres, Lukaku, and Ba - or we revise our targets and bring in someone to do a decent job for a third of Cavani's price. And if Lukaku can score 17 goals for West Bromwich Albion in a rotation role, imagine what he can do for us - I'm very excited for him to be given a real chance at Chelsea.

The way we operate is almost ignoring the strikers anyway. Ba and Torres struggle because our midfield is our real attacking outlet - Mata, Hazard, Lampard and Oscar will get you 60 goals a season between them, easily. That is, in most seasons, 45-55% of our goals tally. Why spend £50 million + on another striker who probably will struggle, just like Torres, to score 20 goals a season for this team? Everyone goes on about Drogba, but he only had two seasons where he scored more than 16 goals for this club. Strikers typically struggle in Mourinho teams, as well.

Bullet dodged? Possibly.

You took the wrong angle.

Every things you've said is why we should try to have Cavani.

As he's forward that is used and good to set-up other players in good position, has amazing work-rate, good holding play and good header. He's the most complete forward, exactly why we should try to have him as he adds to the team he plays much more than goals.

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

You took the wrong angle.

Every things you've said is why we should try to have Cavani.

As he's forward that is used and good to set-up other players in good position, has amazing work-rate, good holding play and good header. He's the most complete forward, exactly why we should try to have him as he adds to the team he plays much more than goals.

If that's your criteria Rooney would be a better candidate.

[The only place to be 11,313]

If that's your criteria Rooney would be a better candidate.

Yep, but I can't see United selling him to us. From almost every angle he'd be my preferred option IF he wants it. If he's prepared to work his bollocks off to prove everyone wrong, he can become the best striker in football.

[mediator 2,026]

Problem with Rooney are his wages, they are supermassive

[edenhazard17 281]

What a Load of Drama

Mom Saying ....... My Son wants Man City Move

Dad Saying ....... My Son Wants Real Madrid Move

Wife wants Cavani to be in Napoli

Edinson Cavani, himself wants Chelsea Move ........... lol

If we believe what parents said about the player's future career. We should have Kaka by now.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Problem with Rooney are his wages, they are supermassive

True, but he's hugely marketable. He's sold more shirts than anyone else in the PL, although he did drop off last season.

Still, there is massive potential for commercial benefits from his signing. Maybe there's an argument that Cavani opens up the South American market, but the English product has worldwide appeal and an English player of Rooney's calibre wil always travel well.

[YouNameIt 1,511]

ARE PEOPLE REALLY SO RETARDED THAT THEY ARE TRUSTING SOME RANDOM BULLSHIT TWITTER AND OTHER SO CALLED "SOURCES" LIKE THE DAILYFAIL?

Jesus christ...get real folks!

[BlueLion. 21,491]

^ says the person who said we'd win the league this season

[Sovieticus 743]

Just sell Torres and bring in Bony or Benteke so we could have an all blacks frontline.

One of the best idea's I've read here.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Funniest thing I've read in this topic are those posts along the line of "why don't we just pay the other €8 million", etc. - just like it's an extra fiver! This isn't FIFA, some people - nay, a lot of people - need to realise that.

[Spike 12,049]

Funniest thing I've read in this topic are those posts along the line of "why don't we just pay the other €8 million", etc. - just like it's an extra fiver! This isn't FIFA, some people - nay, a lot of people - need to realise that.

And wages on top...say he earns €12 million a year on five year contract that adds up to a total of €60 million. With the fee it's over €120 million!

[AndersonBLUE 819]

Not actually that bothered, let him go where he wants where the money is highest.

Nothing against Cavani, nothing at all. He can't do anything here - the Napoli president is simply a greedy, greedy bastard. Fair play though, shows a bit of back-bone. And why should Napoli sell? They've truly re-established themselves in Italy for the first time in 15 years, and Cavani is a massive part of that.

Not signing him means we either invest a bit of faith in the £75 million-worth of strikers we currently have at the club - Torres, Lukaku, and Ba - or we revise our targets and bring in someone to do a decent job for a third of Cavani's price. And if Lukaku can score 17 goals for West Bromwich Albion in a rotation role, imagine what he can do for us - I'm very excited for him to be given a real chance at Chelsea.

The way we operate is almost ignoring the strikers anyway. Ba and Torres struggle because our midfield is our real attacking outlet - Mata, Hazard, Lampard and Oscar will get you 60 goals a season between them, easily. That is, in most seasons, 45-55% of our goals tally. Why spend £50 million + on another striker who probably will struggle, just like Torres, to score 20 goals a season for this team? Everyone goes on about Drogba, but he only had two seasons where he scored more than 16 goals for this club. Strikers typically struggle in Mourinho teams, as well.

Bullet dodged? Possibly.

Don't agree. Signing Cavani would have been incredible. We would have a fantastic chance of winning more competitions with him in our team. Sure we have great talent striker wise here but they are all unproven at Chelsea (not counting Torres). I know Cavani isn't either but he is a different ball game to the others currently. I wouldn't say it was a bullet dodged.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

I'm not saying it is a bullet dodged. I'm saying it could be. I think you've gotten the wrong end of the stick.

Of course Cavani is a wonderful player - but is he a £55 million player, or whatever price Napoli are demanding? He is a notch above the rest of our striking options, but why go out there and spend so much on a player who won't even be the focal point of our team? Unless we totally revise the way we play to cater around him - which, if we didn't do for £50 million Torres, we won't for Cavani; especially since Mourinho is pretty rigid in his systems - there's no point buying someone who will get no service whatsoever.

The way we play, we're better off signing a poacher like Dzeko or Gómez.