Jump to content

Chelsea 4-3 Man Utd


James
 Share

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

I don't think he can be dropped considering the price tag and there's no alternative either with Lavia being permanently in the treatment room. 

There are alternatives, however the alternatives would make for a shocking indication of where his current standard is currently at. As you say the price tag saves him along with Poch's cluelessness in knowing when to drop players - see Sanchez, Silva, Disasi and Sterling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, JFKvsNixon said:

I disagree. He's come from a team that's organised, where he knows his and his teammates  roles clearly, to a disjointed mess. What you see as him being slow, is probably him being one step behind, always trying to catch up. Let's not forget that Liverpool were happy to match our bid. There's no way they'd paid that money if they weren't pretty certain there's one helluva player in there. 

Putting faith in another club's judgment is how we ended up with Cucurella.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, lucio said:

It was to drive our price up after we highjacked lavia who they actually wanted as is actually good. Liverpool are capable of making bad signings too. He’s shit and won’t improve 

Even I don't rely on my memory these days but my recollection is that Liverpool switched their attention to Lavia after they failed to land Caicedo. Even if that recollection is correct it does not rule out the possibility that this was just the order in which the two deals became public. It does not mean that the two deals must have started in the order I gave. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Special Juan said:

What a complete mental game, two words Goal Palmer, some player that boy.

What was more worrying is at 2-0 I said to my kids this game is far from over and we will lose the lead🤐 shambolic goals to give away

The fact is that two-nil was a lie. It bore little or no relation to the way play had gone up to that point. 

Edited by OhForAGreavsie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

The fact is that two-nil was a lie. It bore little or no relation to the way play had gone up to that point. 

No, MU were not a Sheffield United but it looked more like 3-0 than 2-1.
We (Caicedo) brought them back to life just like in the Leicester game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rewatched the highlight, gotta appreciate Madueke. He is clearly lacking consitency and overally he is a very messy player and often wasteful, but when it's needed at least he is always trying things happen, makes runs and shots which often lead to goal or even just corner/free kick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You