Jump to content

Chelsea 2 - 2 Tottenham


 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Kong said:

Spurs first goal yeah its a foul on havertz but that was 44 seconds before they scored, jorgi was the reason for that goal. Second goal yes was a foul we got dicked but by that point we should of been 4-1 up any way. Its our own fault

It was not just a foul on Havertz. It was a foul on jorginho as well and richarlison was obstructing mendy's view from an offside position.

We were wasteful but not excessively so. we did enough to win this game and would have with any other ref.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kong said:

Spurs first goal yeah its a foul on havertz but that was 44 seconds before they scored, jorgi was the reason for that goal. Second goal yes was a foul we got dicked but by that point we should of been 4-1 up any way. Its our own fault

Just look at @Vesper post - Richarlison was offside & obstructing Mendy's view. Jorgi's mistake shouldn't have even mattered when all was said & done.

Rules are supposedly in place to be followed all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

It was not just a foul on Havertz. It was a foul on jorginho as well and richarlison was obstructing mendy's view from an offside position.

We were wasteful but not excessively so. we did enough to win this game and would have with any other ref.

Was it fuck a foul or jorgi lmao u joking? The useless cunt got caught out trying to be clever that was never a foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

Just look at @Vesper post - Richarlison was offside & obstructing Mendy's view. Jorgi's mistake shouldn't have even mattered when all was said & done.

Rules are supposedly in place to be followed all the time.

VAR checked it and let it stand. Nothing we can do about it, what we can control is how to clear a fucking ball out of danger 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Vesper said:

Mendy had to bend to the left to look around the OFFSIDE Richarlson, so was tulted the wrong way on the goal shot to his right

Image

Alright lets say the first goal was not a foul on Havertz, then what was this? Is it not Mendy trying to see the ball past Richardlison? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kong said:

Was it fuck a foul or jorgi lmao u joking? The useless cunt got caught out trying to be clever that was never a foul.

I don't think Jorginho got fouled but Havertz did. Even before the slide tackle, he is impeded and Richarlison is defo in Mendy's way no doubt. Cucu had his hair literally dragged and this ref will act like nothing happened just to ensure Spurs take their corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Stats said:

I don't think Jorginho got fouled but Havertz did. Even before the slide tackle, he is impeded and Richarlison is defo in Mendy's way no doubt. Cucu had his hair literally dragged and this ref will act like nothing happened just to ensure Spurs take their corner.

All true but let's be honest here we should of been 4-1 by the second goal. Blame the ref as much as u like but reason we lost today is simple we have no number 9. Clear as day is what we need

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kong said:

VAR checked it and let it stand. Nothing we can do about it, what we can control is how to clear a fucking ball out of danger 

No one is excusing Jorgi, but I don't understand this train of thought in the slightest. VAR gave a no call on Cucu being dragged to the floor.

Two or five hundred wrongs don't make a right. To sum it up, Tottenham earned a point due to refereeing decisions.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

No one is excusing Jorgi, but I don't understand this train of thought in the slightest. VAR gave a no call on Cucu being dragged to the floor.

Two or five hundred wrongs don't make a right. To sum it up, Tottenham earned a point due to refereeing decisions.  

VAR can't get involved in the cucu foul because the ref didn't see it. VAR is only used for red cards and goals nothing eles, because the ref didn't give it they can't look at it 

Edited by Kong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kong said:

VAR can't get involved in the cucu foul because the ref didn't see it. VAR is only used for red cards and goals nothing eles

Since when is pulling someone by the hair to the ground not deemed violent conduct? And if the technicality of VAR means the assistant cannot review fouls off the ball the official missed than the application is wrong and forever doomed of inconsistency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kong said:

VAR can't get involved in the cucu foul because the ref didn't see it. VAR is only used for red cards and goals nothing eles, because the ref didn't give it they can't look at it 

I thought it was the total opposite. Doesn't VAR get involved and informs the ref of something he ought to look at (reason the ref waited before the second corner was taken and was clearly having a conversation with VAR)?

I'd love to be proven wrong, though.

Edited by LAM09
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

Since when is pulling someone by the hair to the ground not deemed violent conduct? And if the technicality of VAR means the assistant cannot review fouls off the ball the official missed than the application is wrong and forever doomed of inconsistency. 

They just explained it after the game. Because the ref didn't see it or give it VAR cannot get involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...