Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Blue Armour said:

You are absolutely right. Maybe Mount and Kovacic are past their sell by date, but the fact is we are being forced to sell former first team members to rival clubs because we are in a tough spot

You can't paint a pretty picture out of this, because I've seen Arsenal do exactly that in the past decade and they've suffered for years because of that.

People can remain optimistic, and of course I am optimistic about having a real manager for once, but don't be surprised if Kovacic and Mount are soon followed by James and Colwill out the door a year later.

It's a very pathetic state of affairs.

It's all good if Kovavcic and Mount were actually outperformed by their replacements.

But no. We are shite and being made to pay for it.

 

Reg : Mount. It will sting but I will still be very glad we didn't make him a top wage bracket player here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kovacic had to go, he's been off for about one season and a half. Of course he'll be good at City, but I cannot blame the club for allowing him to fulfill his wish of joining them. After all, the man's a Europa League, Champions League, European Super Cup and Club World Cup winner with Chelsea. If that's his wish, just grab the money and go.

As per Mount, he will also come good at United and the narative will be "Chelsea gave up on him just like they did with De Bruyne and Salah". But that is not the case. If he doesn't want to stay, then what can you do? I mean, if Reece and Chilwell hadn't agreed to extend their stay at the club, I would've pointed fingers at the board, but it seems that the issue is somewhere in between them and Mason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TheHulk said:

Should've got him on loan again and bin Havertz, what an dumb decision this was.

I mean surely the fact no one wants to pounce on our "dumb decision" vindicates it? 

Edited by Tomo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Blue Armour said:

You are absolutely right. Maybe Mount and Kovacic are past their sell by date, but the fact is we are being forced to sell former first team members to rival clubs because we are in a tough spot

You can't paint a pretty picture out of this, because I've seen Arsenal do exactly that in the past decade and they've suffered for years because of that.

People can remain optimistic, and of course I am optimistic about having a real manager for once, but don't be surprised if Kovacic and Mount are soon followed by James and Colwill out the door a year later.

It's a very pathetic state of affairs.

It's all good if Kovavcic and Mount were actually outperformed by their replacements.

But no. We are shite and being made to pay for it.

 

It won't be nice from a sentimentality point of view but that's where the comparisons with Arsenal end.

They were selling players at the absolute peak of their powers and not replacing them properly, Kova and Mount have not only had huge question marks on them for over a year now we have upgraded heavily on Kova and by the looks of it will on Mason aswell, certainly the last 18 months version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bigbluewillie said:

He's never showed me he has anything, like what has he ever done that looks good.

He was a real handful for defenders , strong and pacy. Our season would have gone better if he remained fit. He’s probably crippled now though regardless 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have loved Kova at Chelsea but even I can admit it’s the right time for him to go even if it’s to a domestic rival. If he was 24-25 I’d be adamantly against it. But he’s nearly 30 now and has had constant injury problems. And even when he has been fit he hasn’t been his best like he was a couple of season ago. A situation like City is perfect for him since he won’t have to be an every match player. He’ll be rotated constantly by Pep so his injury risk will be lessened.

As for Mount, I just could not imagine a scenario in which he played regularly for us if he stayed. Not when we have the attacking midfield options we have. He’s not playing ahead of Nkunku or even Kai in the second striker role, he’s not playing ahead of the actual, natural wingers we have, and moving him deeper in midfield is pointless. So squeezing £60m or more out of someone is great business. Will he go on to be solid for United? Sure. But I really don’t think he’s a special enough talent to haunt us like Salah or KdB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You