Chelsea Transfers

[gdlk 264]

Sell that wood! If its true. 

[Mhsc 866]

Conor is a blue, he wont be going to Spurs imo. £50m for him would be a good deal though.

[OneMoSalah 8,754]

8 hours ago, Mário César said:

spurs are interested in gallegher 

it would be a bit weird see him in one of our biggest rivals

Why? Hes fucking shite?

I am surprised Ange would even go for him as his sides usually rely heavily on technical midfield players, particularly at Celtic with O’Reilly, McGregor and Hatate. 

Although we are that short on midfield options that we really shouldn’t sell him until we sort out at least 2 signings in there.

Edited July 12, 2023 by OneMoSalah

[Vesper 28,389]

33 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

£50m…. Hmmm

 

£50m and it's buh bye!!

[OneMoSalah 8,754]

7 hours ago, Tomo said:

He's more than promising, he's as guaranteed a bet as Reece James was in 2019.

The only way he should be sold is if he starts behaving in ways that keeping him becomes impossible.

If he doesn’t want to stay or goes about things in a way as you’ve stated, we should sell though. No point keeping folk who aren’t interested in being here, regardless of what they will become. I mean thats been the message from the club this summer looking at how we’ve went around our business in terms of offloading players who aren’t interested in being here. 

The initial signs from his side, although may be misconstrued, don’t look promising at all. I mean if he really wants to play for Brighton ahead of us that is worrying - more so than anything else. Hopefully the way these rumours and signs etc look changes over the next week or 2 as he has a huge chance of being a nailed on regular from day 1 (even more so with BB injured). Although he still has to earn his slot in the same way like James did, like Mase did, like Fikayo did, like Tammy did etc competing with players in certain positions/coming out of the team for others as and when also if form dictates it. Can’t just expect it to be given which if this is something he is expecting, he needs to check himself a bit.

The ethos and approach of the club and Poch has to be building around players who actually want to be here though and guys who are fully committed - particularly after the moans and groans of players downing tools last year. 

Edited July 12, 2023 by OneMoSalah

[TheHulk 1,825]

These guys mocked the old regime about the commercial side and now they are settling for even worse.

Edited July 12, 2023 by TheHulk

[Tomo 21,730]

15 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

If he doesn’t want to stay or goes about things in a way as you’ve stated, we should sell though. No point keeping folk who aren’t interested in being here, regardless of what they will become. I mean thats been the message from the club this summer looking at how we’ve went around our business in terms of offloading players who aren’t interested in being here. 

The initial signs from his side, although may be misconstrued, don’t look promising at all. I mean if he really wants to play for Brighton ahead of us that is worrying - more so than anything else. Hopefully the way these rumours and signs etc look changes over the next week or 2 as he has a huge chance of being a nailed on regular from day 1 (even more so with BB injured). Although he still has to earn his slot in the same way like James did, like Mase did, like Fikayo did, like Tammy did etc competing with players in certain positions/coming out of the team for others as and when also if form dictates it. Can’t just expect it to be given which if this is something he is expecting, he needs to check himself a bit.

The ethos and approach of the club and Poch has to be building around players who actually want to be here though and guys who are fully committed - particularly after the moans and groans of players downing tools last year. 

It wasn't to dissimilar to what Saliba was doing for a while before getting into Arsenal's team.

I think/hope he's using his leverage. Which in many ways can't blame him for as he came back last summer ready to go only for us to sign Kouli in his position. 

[milka 3,336]

 

[Pizy 18,342]

8 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

These guys mocked the old regime about the commercial side and now they are settling for even worse.

Something has to be wrong behind the scenes on the commercial side, man. Struggling for months to even get a sponsor at all and now we’re asking for peanuts for it? Aren’t our big club PL rivals all getting paid almost twice this for their shirt sponsorships? What are we doing?

[TheHulk 1,825]

2 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Something has to be wrong behind the scenes on the commercial side, man. Struggling for months to even get a sponsor at all and now we’re asking for peanuts for it? Aren’t our big club PL rivals all getting paid almost twice this for their shirt sponsorships? What are we doing?

Tottenham earning 40m a season and have fuck all European competition, let that sink in. 

[Gundalf 804]

Funny how City is basically sponsored by itself.....and quite ahead of everyone else........but we cant have Paramount 🙄

Edited July 12, 2023 by Gundalf

[ZAPHOD2319 4,416]

 

[Pizy 18,342]

So after like 5 seasons straight of being linked with a move away to every big club under the sun, Milinkovic-Savic finally leaves Lazio. To go to Saudi to never be seen or heard from again. 

It’s going to take some real getting used to seeing under 30nplayers in their prime going to that league.

[Blue Armour 4,256]

1 hour ago, TheHulk said:

These guys mocked the old regime about the commercial side and now they are settling for even worse.

It's a shame they lost the Paramount deal though.

We were screwed by the FA big time there.

[Magic Lamps 11,636]

11 minutes ago, Blue Armour said:

It's a shame they lost the Paramount deal though.

We were screwed by the FA big time there.

they love to fk us over. All those pool, manure, arse fans love to hate us. Just wonder why they suck up to City so much. Not even PSG got away with their 400m Qatar airways deal but etihad is fine? It’s ridiculous 

[bluesman2610 1,338]

2 hours ago, Pizy said:

Something has to be wrong behind the scenes on the commercial side, man. Struggling for months to even get a sponsor at all and now we’re asking for peanuts for it? Aren’t our big club PL rivals all getting paid almost twice this for their shirt sponsorships? What are we doing?

We had paramount for big money the PL said conflict we also had the stake.com and that was also reported for big money and the fans said no to gambling on the shirt. The board can’t please everyone unfortunately 

[Vegetable 830]

46 minutes ago, Blue Armour said:

It's a shame they lost the Paramount deal though.

We were screwed by the FA big time there.

Weird it went down so quietly and easy.

Can't advertise no bank, beer, luxury watches, it services as well because of potential conflict? Yeah, lets all promote bookies and paydays loans, because that's pretty much what's left, is, say, legal and have funds. Meanwhile shady oil money good.

[robsblubot 3,468]

32 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

they love to fk us over. All those pool, manure, arse fans love to hate us. Just wonder why they suck up to City so much. Not even PSG got away with their 400m Qatar airways deal but etihad is fine? It’s ridiculous 

it is indeed bizarre. Being successful generates hate by definition in competitive sports, because only one wins each comp, so we always have to beat someone or someones to win anything. on the other hand, there is the dual standards as you point out.
I think it may be specific to Russia money (Chelsky and whatnot), so that might change with what so looks like a much dumber money being the club. 😅