Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Mhsc said:

If Kante can come back from injury and play the rest of the season, and we buy Enzo, people will fucking dread playing us. 

Yep. Injury free Kante from a couple of years ago would be the picture perfect partner for Enzo.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pizy said:

No more mega money strikers. We need to put these new scouts and sporting directors to work on finding the next inexpensive gem that can become a superstar. Maybe that’ll be David Fofana.

I also dont expect as to go for striker. If Felix is hit this season we will buy him. Add Nkunku and Havertz. City looked better team without typical number 9 and Liverpool as well.

In fact, if we get Enzo now we are pretty much set for many, many years except some cosmetic changes.

GK - age is not important and lets see if we go for someone like Raya in the summer or stick with Kepa, not that bothered with that. Slonina 18 huge hope for him.

RB - James 23 Gusto 19 (set for 10 years here!)

LB - Chilwell 26 Cucurella 24 Hall 18

CB - Fofana 22 Badiashile 21 Colwill 19 Chalobah 23 Silva 38 will stay one more season so in summer 2024 we will replace him. Apart from that set for next 10 years as well.

MF - Enzo 22 Gallagher 22 Mount 24 Kante 31 Kovacic 28. Plus we have guys like Casadei 20 Santos 18 Chukwuemeka 19 so when times come they can replace Kante and Kovacic or we will go in the market but nothing to think about for a couple of years more. Kante will sign new contract and if he is back in his usual form and no injuries what a pairing he would be with Enzo!

Wingers and Strikers - Mudryk 22 Madueke 20 Havertz 23 Felix 23 Nkunku 25 Pulisic 24 Sterling 28 Fofana 20 Broja 21.

I did not list guys like Mendy, KK, Azpi, Jorginho, RLC, Ziyech and Auba because they are probably all gone in the summer. Zakaria lets see what happens, how he plays.

Some will go on loan ofc like Hall, CC, Broja, Fofana, Casadei, Santos and some may be sold like Chalobah, Gallagher or Mount, Pulisic.

Overall most exciting time ahead. What Boehly did in just 6 months is amazing!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Yep. Injury free Kante from a couple of years ago would be the picture perfect partner for Enzo.

 

Or Zakaria.If we can keep him fit, he would be a bargain. Sadly we have no reason to be confident in our medical department.

 

30 minutes ago, Pizy said:

No more mega money strikers. We need to put these new scouts and sporting directors to work on finding the next inexpensive gem that can become a superstar. Maybe that’ll be David Fofana.

agree. we have been throwing money at this position forever now. we should look at developing a CF on our own and get a cheap&experienced back up like we had with Giroud. This way there is not the pressure of a big money signing around and the young one is not forced to deliver every week when he has an experienced back up and mentor. The latter is obviously not Aubameyang cos his attitude is shit and his pace has gone but in general the idea was probably the right one. Maybe we could snap up Firmino on a free in summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

agree. we have been throwing money at this position forever now. we should look at developing a CF on our own and get a cheap&experienced back up like we had with Giroud. This way there is not the pressure of a big money signing around and the young one is not forced to deliver every week when he has an experienced back up and mentor. The latter is obviously not Aubameyang cos his attitude is shit and his pace has gone but in general the idea was probably the right one. Maybe we could snap up Firmino on a free in summer.

Benzema could even be an outside option, but it would hinge on a number of factors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Jype since you have great knowledge about FFP and how money is amortized, I remember you putting exact numbers for these long contracts and how great for FFP is to sell academy products, can you explain where we would be post summer if next happens:

With Enzo our spending will be around 600m euros just this season. Lets say we buy Felix for 80m in the summer and GK for 20m. So 700m 😂

We got 55,60m last summer and possibly we sell plenty more in the summer like KK, Azpi, Ziyech, Auba, Lukaku... Wont bother how much can we get for them but my main question is since academy players are pure profit what would mean to us if this summer we get for example 20m instalment from Roma for Abraham, 20-30 for Chalobah, RLC 15-20, Ampadu 10-15m, Cho 20-25, Gallagher or Mount 35-50m. So most likely way over 100m pounds maybe even 150m just for our academy boys and with new players signing 7,8,9 years long contracts how would that reflect on the books?

Edited by NikkiCFC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

Jesus christ. Again…. 😂 the saga continues… again

I've had a very busy few days. When I got back from Kingsmeadow this afternoon I had something to eat and promptly fell asleep I woke up about half an hour ago and have been reading through this thread. I can honestly say this is the most fun transfer Saga ever.

This is partly because I don't think I've ever seen a Chelsea forum display such unanimity about a transfer target. It's the first time I remember becoming convinced about a transfer based purely on the opinions of other people. I simply do not think it is possible that you could all be wrong. This second-hand opinion means I feel a little bit detached, and can just read the thread like an enjoyable book. 🙂🙂

Edited by OhForAGreavsie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheHulk said:

 

The above buyout clause element of the story sounds convincing to me.

Someone, I can't remember who but thank you, posted a link to the rules governing the tax treatment of buyout clause transfers. If I correctly understood what I read, then the tax situation of both the buying, and the selling, Club is more favourable when the deal is completed without formally triggering the clause. I wrote some time ago suggesting that the negotiation would be based on Benfica wanting to split the savings with Chelsea.

I'm not convinced that the €160m figure is accurate but if we use it as an example, Chelsea would save about €40m by completing the deal as a standard transfer. My two guesses were, and are, that Benfica are asking for a sizeable chunk of that saving, and that this process explains why Chelsea paid over the buyout clause for Nkunku.

Edited by OhForAGreavsie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Vesper said:

bullshit

is mostly pee forced by extremely pelvic bladder manipulation, or, often in porn, they load the girl up with water via a douche then film it

I am getting mansplained about female sex now, LOLOLOL

 

3 hours ago, YorkshireBlue said:

I don't remember loading up any 1 with water lol but if it's pee it's pee us lads couldn't care less at that point lol

This "book" that I'm reading just took a very strange turn. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

The above buyout clause element of the story sounds convincing to me.

Someone, I can't remember who but thank you, posted a link to the rules governing the tax treatment of buyout clause transfers. If I correctly understood what I read, then the tax situation of both the buying, and the selling, Club is more favourable when the deal is completed without formally triggering the clause. I wrote some time ago suggesting that the negotiation would be based on Benfica wanting to split the savings with Chelsea.

I'm not convinced that the €160m figure is accurate but if we use it as an example, Chelsea would save about €40m by completing the deal as a standard transfer. My two guesses were, and are, that Benfica are asking for a sizeable chunk of that saving, and that this process explains why Chelsea paid over the buyout clause for Nkunku.

I think in Chelsea's case it is also important for FFP treatment too. 

As you have suggested, to activate the clause involves Enzo paying it (i.e. buying out his contract), and to do this Chelsea will have to give him the money and pay relevant taxes over and above this figure to him.

But another key is that if Chelsea pay Enzo, this payment isn't treated like a normal transfer transaction for FFP purposes where it can be spread over the length of his contract, it would have to be treated as one lump payment in this year's accounts for FFP which I don't think will make things possible.

In this situation, we'd actually be better off ironically paying a little over the release clause and spreading over I'm guessing 7 - 8 years than activating the clause and footing the FFP cost in full now. Benfica will know this, as well as you mentioned, the additional costs involved with activating the clause, and as a result will look to extract what they can.

Ultimately though, Benfica are tough negotiators but they are a selling club. If the price is right they'll do a deal and I don't think they're the sort of club who would put their foot down because it's the end of the window like how Brighton are looking to do with Caicedo. I think if anything, they'll be encouraged that they can get potentially a better deal now then they can in the summer when other midfielders may enter the market as targets for the top teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Superblue said:

I think in Chelsea's case it is also important for FFP treatment too. 

As you have suggested, to activate the clause involves Enzo paying it (i.e. buying out his contract), and to do this Chelsea will have to give him the money and pay relevant taxes over and above this figure to him.

But another key is that if Chelsea pay Enzo, this payment isn't treated like a normal transfer transaction for FFP purposes where it can be spread over the length of his contract, it would have to be treated as one lump payment in this year's accounts for FFP which I don't think will make things possible.

In this situation, we'd actually be better off ironically paying a little over the release clause and spreading over I'm guessing 7 - 8 years than activating the clause and footing the FFP cost in full now. Benfica will know this, as well as you mentioned, the additional costs involved with activating the clause, and as a result will look to extract what they can.

Ultimately though, Benfica are tough negotiators but they are a selling club. If the price is right they'll do a deal and I don't think they're the sort of club who would put their foot down because it's the end of the window like how Brighton are looking to do with Caicedo. I think if anything, they'll be encouraged that they can get potentially a better deal now then they can in the summer when other midfielders may enter the market as targets for the top teams.

Yes exactly.

Funding a player to trigger his buyout clause is treated as paying him wages. Wages must be accounted, in full, for FFP in the season they are paid. 

 

 

Edited by OhForAGreavsie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You