Jump to content

Erling Haaland


NikkiCFC
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Jas said:

The update is that there is no update.

Fjortoft was on Romano's show and all he apparently said was basically what we already know for ages - the club are interested in Haaland but there's no agreement etc. all comes down to whether the club can put in a bid big enough to make Dortmund sell him. 

Well that is hardly surprising Fjortoft is a known BS'er. 

Where I stand on Håland is that it was always a difficult transfer to pull off. I think I rated it as a 30%-40% chance as Dortmund clearly don't want to sell. For me, the deal was never going to happen during the Euro's but I don't see us going all the way to the deadline to try and get it done. In my opinion, we have about three weeks to get it done with every passing week meaning it becomes less likely. 

I do think we will sign players this Summer and I think they will be good players, however I do think the club are prioritising selling players and getting extentions for players like AC/Rudi/Liva/Bate which makes sense as we have so many dregs and those four players are quite valuable.  

Edited by King Kante
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, King Kante said:

Be interesting to know what the actual offer was. 

well, we value Tammy at (lolol) £50m

and CHO I am sure around £30-35m

€175m is £150m

so it was likely £65-70m cash + Tammy & CHO

at MOST is £90m cash + Tammy & CHO (Tammy at £35m, CHO at £25m)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, King Kante said:

Be interesting to know what the actual offer was. 

That's assuming it's even true considering it's Sky...

3 minutes ago, Vesper said:

well, we value Tammy at (lolol) £50m

and CHO I am sure around £30-35m

€175m is £150m

so it was likely £65-70m cash + Tammy & CHO

at MOST is £90m cash + Tammy & CHO (Tammy at £35m, CHO at £25m)

The Sky report said we offered one or the other, not both. 

EDIT: England's Sky said Abraham OR CHO while Germany's Sky said both. Go figure...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jas said:

That's assuming it's even true considering it's Sky...

The Sky report said we offered one or the other, not both. 

then if Tammy, it was £100m to £115m cash, likely £100m

if CHO, £115m to £125m, likely £115m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Vesper said:

then if Tammy, it was £100m to £115m cash, likely £100m

if CHO, £115m to £125m, likely £115m

Even if that story was true, I doubt the club even offered that amount of cash to start with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jas said:

Even if that story was true, I doubt the club even offered that amount of cash to start with.

that was based off the €175m price that so many claim is what they want

I cannot please everyone (I still say they would take €150m cash)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vesper said:

that was based off the €175m price that so many claim is what they want

I cannot please everyone (I still say they would take €150m cash)

I meant valuing the player for XXX amount and then offer the remaining in cash. I mean, if the club could say 100 million immediately, I highly doubt the remaining 50 million is a problem. Am sure the club would try to get Dortmund to lower their price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jas said:

I meant valuing the player for XXX amount and then offer the remaining in cash. I mean, if the club could say 100 million immediately, I highly doubt the remaining 50 million is a problem. Am sure the club would try to get Dortmund to lower their price. 

well, all you need to do then

if you take my figure of €150m

is reduce the cash on all my posts above by £21m

simple maths

Edited by Vesper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You