Mikel John Obi

[OneMoSalah 8,885]

Whats the point of having a system when you don't have players for it ?

So there are two ways of looking at it. Everything is about the players, because they play and not the system, nor the coach. Nowadays you can so often see a striker in defence, or a centre half in a strikers position, even scoring. In the past that wasn't possible. This means football is evolving and pure theory is becoming less and less important.

Of course you have to have responsible players on the pitch, because without them success is impossible.

Formations and tactics these days are the most important things. You can have the 11 best players in the world but if you don't have a system that has balance and allows your team to accomodate all your players so they can attack and defend well, well whats the point?

[Bosnian Blue 2,471]

Formations and tactics these days are the most important things. You can have the 11 best players in the world but if you don't have a system that has balance and allows your team to all your players so they can attack and defend well, well whats the point?

You've said it yourself, systems are adjusted to the players you have.

A proper manager is flexible, uses a lot of varieties, tactical tricks, different formations... He'd never have only one system to use whereever he goes or whoever he has in his team. But now we're going way off topic.

[OneMoSalah 8,885]

You've said it yourself, systems are adjusted to the players you have.

A proper manager is flexible, uses a lot of varieties, tactical tricks, different formations... He'd never have only one system to use whereever he goes or whoever he has in his team. But now we're going way off topic.

Yes but that doens't make the players more important than the system. A manager is flexible yes but still the system is the most important thing. Yes off topic but haha its nice to mention stuff than this rather than 'Mikel is shit' etc......

[Bosnian Blue 2,471]

That wasn't the point which was when the manager has chosen the proper system suited to what he has at his disposal, players have to respect it.

What if Cole decided to stay upfront to challenge long balls or cut crosses because he wants to score ? That's absurd, that's not his role. Same with Mikel and the passing range (until a certain extent, he should use more often his long play in 4-2-3-1 and everybody will agree on that)

What if Cole never joined the attack and kept his position against Stoke at home ?

You're right it wasn't the point, but I used it to describe my thought precisely. Players must respect the system and most of them do, but in modern football it's becoming less significant than before. Before you could never see a left back five meters in front of opponents goal. Systems are made for players, not the other way around. Therefore, players are more important than systems.

[Heisenberg 1,824]

So basically you expect Mikel to chase the ball like a dummy, such as Cheick Tioté who leaves massive gaps and commits way too much fouls ? The most important thing when midfielders have to defend is not to be attracted by the ball. Mikel is brilliant to respect the positional instructions such as zonal marking (what 4-2-3-1 means for the two midfielders, especially given Mata's laziness).

He recovers the ball standing, barely dives into challenges... people seem to regard that as a clear statement of powerlessness. That's valuable to stay on one's feet!

I'm not so sure about Mikel's lack of aggressiveness, when he puts the foot in he barely loses the challenge because the opponent was stronger. And some of Mikel's tactical fouls such as the ones at the start of some games (classic shit to shut down your direct opponent) are sufficiently rash and reckless not for him to be regarded as weak to challenge for the ball.

Khedira is similar to Ramires in Madid's pattern: his role is to come out and press. Mikel has Alonso's role, to do the deep distribution. That's not Mikel's role to chase the ball like a headless chicken

Khedira has impressive stamina, he's decent to carry the ball up, fill the gaps, score the odd goal, recover the ball... But by no mean he's brilliant in one of those facets

Exactly, i want my DM to chase the ball everytime everywhere when the opponent attack, just like Ramires against Arsenal did.The problem is that Mikel is no near as good as Xabi Alonso, too slow and far less creative than Xabi.Bonne nuit !

[OneMoSalah 8,885]

So basically you expect Mikel to chase the ball like a dummy, such as Cheick Tioté who leaves massive gaps and commits way too much fouls ? The most important thing when midfielders have to defend is not to be attracted by the ball. Mikel is brilliant to respect the positional instructions such as zonal marking (what 4-2-3-1 means for the two midfielders, especially given Mata's laziness).

He recovers the ball standing, barely dives into challenges... people seem to regard that as a clear statement of powerlessness. That's valuable to stay on one's feet!

I'm not so sure about Mikel's lack of aggressiveness, when he puts the foot in he barely loses the challenge because the opponent was stronger. And some of Mikel's tactical fouls such as the ones at the start of some games (classic shit to shut down your direct opponent) are sufficiently rash and reckless not for him to be regarded as weak to challenge for the ball.

Khedira is similar to Ramires in Madid's pattern: his role is to come out and press. Mikel has Alonso's role, to do the deep distribution. That's not Mikel's role to chase the ball like a headless chicken

Khedira has impressive stamina, he's decent to carry the ball up, fill the gaps, score the odd goal, recover the ball... But by no mean he's brilliant in one of those facets

Thank god someone with sense.

[DJames 729]

Mikel could have put the game to bed with three minutes remaining when he fired over

Ah Mikel when will you score!! I envision mass pandemonium the day he does

[kellzfresh 7,229]

My initial point was related to kellzfresh's remark: he seemed to mean that Mikel should get past his role to show his skills. That's unconceivable for me, Mikel has been given a role and he has to respect it whatever happens. And that's what he does (and the what he gets idiotic criticism for)

I didn't say he should leave his role and become a striker I said he can also give long passes to the strikers or attackers from deep. Which he is scared to do.

So basically you expect Mikel to chase the ball like a dummy, such as Cheick Tioté who leaves massive gaps and commits way too much fouls ? The most important thing when midfielders have to defend is not to be attracted by the ball. Mikel is brilliant to respect the positional instructions such as zonal marking (what 4-2-3-1 means for the two midfielders, especially given Mata's laziness).

He recovers the ball standing, barely dives into challenges... people seem to regard that as a clear statement of powerlessness. That's valuable to stay on one's feet!

I'm not so sure about Mikel's lack of aggressiveness, when he puts the foot in he barely loses the challenge because the opponent was stronger. And some of Mikel's tactical fouls such as the ones at the start of some games (classic shit to shut down your direct opponent) are sufficiently rash and reckless not for him to be regarded as weak to challenge for the ball.

Khedira is similar to Ramires in Madid's pattern: his role is to come out and press. Mikel has Alonso's role, to do the deep distribution. That's not Mikel's role to chase the ball like a headless chicken

Khedira has impressive stamina, he's decent to carry the ball up, fill the gaps, score the odd goal, recover the ball... But by no mean he's brilliant in one of those facets

@bold part is exactly my point. He seems to be given alonso's role and left out a huge part of the role which is to spray passes. He can do it, I've seen him do it for nigeria a lot. But at chelsea he gets scared to do it and dats a problem for me.

[The Rising Sun 711]

We need a DM who can bully opponent players, do some dirty work as well as have the vision for intelligent through balls....

Im not saying Luiz is that player, but he has, atleast for me, shown what we have been lacking for a few years now in DM....

Powerful, pushes away opponents, is commanding and can run fast....

Mikel covers spaces, thereby not affecting the opponent play or pressuring the opponent to lose the ball....

David Luiz does the opposite, he starts by covering space, then when a player is around, puts serious pressure.... he doesnt know the right moment to pressure or put in that tackle yet.... but he's almost there...

Dont think Mikel is what we need to become WC.... However, he has progressed well and will do well at a upper mid table club... Maybe even a CL club in a weaker league.

He is too much of a passive player in my opinion, and lacks command and personality in midfield.... i never liked him before, but over the years have grown to not dislike him, but slowly understand that we need to replace him gracefully, as he has done nothing wrong.... he just isnt the type of player we need in that position.

[bushman 2,043]

Yesterday, I watched the game cos of Mikel. One thing I must say, even though he can not score a goal even if his life would depend on it but he sure had a major part in his team. After all, Mikel is not necessarily there to score goals or is he ?

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Ah Mikel when will you score!! I envision mass pandemonium the day he does

Scored a pen last week with Nigeria in a friendly.

Some of the comments in this thread are depressing to read.

[Spike 12,049]

I usually don't post in this topic because @, & @SeB, post it for me.

[DJames 729]

Scored a pen last week with Nigeria in a friendly.

Some of the comments in this thread are depressing to read.

Good for him!!!

[The only place to be 11,313]

Some of the comments in this thread are depressing to read.

I find the comments on his range of passing to be boring. I've never really had a problem with his passing because he generally just lays it off to people who can do the exciting stuff better.

My problem has always been the stuff that doesn't have a metric on whoscored.com. The intangibles, the amount of shit he gives on the pitch and the effect he has on those around him. I watched Fellaini play in a deeper position than he has done in a while last night and he just seems to be more of what I want in that position than Mikel. He can do the same short passes but he also works harder and asserts himself on the game better. That type of thing is invaluable in lifting those around you.

Like I keep saying, I've never known a player so divide fans and I think it's along the lines of people who are impressed by his passing completion stats, and people who actually watch the games week-in and week-out and put more stock in what they see on the pitch.

[The only place to be 11,313]

How many shit does Fellaini gives on that one ? Could you give a rating ?

I do think that could be negative, below zero... Maybe you might eventually agree with me.

On yesterday night:

No, he wasn't playing in a deeper position, that was his usual *trequarista* position behind the main striker. The only thing that changes is that he drops to get where the ball is played.

And he had his usual passing competion rate, 79% for 54 passes, what doesn't particulary catch the eye.

Especially for the decent proportion of square balls

Everton was pretty poor yesterday, unable to manage the rythm of the game propely considering no one was able to dictate play. Osman had an average game, Gibson wasn't there to pick diagonals. Everton had a 69% pass completion, even if you don't like figures you might agree that it's pretty poor, especially for the dull and slow passing they played

The task to feed the channels and try to find width, to make the Southampton block sliding and try to exploit bad positioning/covering was given to Fellaini due to his central position. I'm not sure that was that efficient to be fair

Wow. That's an amazing picture. And a gif too. All I had was my eyes .

I'm not saying he's the greatest player on Earth and I'm not saying he's perfect, but I think he'd be better in our team than Mikel. I was actually surprised with his passing last night. I thought he kept the ball moving around the pitch well (especially in his own half).

To me he looked to be playing deeper, but if you tell me he was playing a trequatisa then who am I to disagree. When I watched him, he looked to be playing a lot deeper. In fact he seems to be all over the pitch which is fairly impressive.

Having looked at whoscored.com though, he seems to have an 80% pass completion percentage with 2 shots on target, 5 tackles and 3 interceptions. The problem is that anyone who watched that game and also watched either of our games against Southampton could see that it's hard to compare what he does in that team to what he'd do in our's. Firstly, he'd be asked to sit a lot deeper most of the time. But more importantly, he'd have better players alongside him who would get themselves open better. He'd also be up against teams who would sit deeper and put less pressure on him.

It's another of my problems with people's reliance on stats. They don't tell the whole story and they especially ignore the other players in the team and the opposition.