zolayes 14,489 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Who is GLC ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! nullabletype 987 Posted November 24, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted November 24, 2015 So Le Saux can say so much shit in the media, and Mourinho can't even react? When JT did the same with Savage everybody was laughing. Absolutely thought this at the time. I have no issue with that JT said about Savage, I found it humourous actually, but the same lot on here who cry foul every time José opens his mouth were lapping up the comments made by JT when there was no real reason for him to single out and take a pop at Savage. It really came out of nowhere and was no more or less "childish" than 90% of what José says.Furthermore, calling José childish for making a fleeting comment regarding Le Saux is just looking for controversy and I'm not remotely surprised to see which posters are supposedly bothered by it. If Le Saux wants to make multiple publicised statements containing comments charged with hyperbole such as "set the game back 30 years" then I think a passing name drop is well in the spirit of things and totally fair game.Not excusing José's tantrum at the medical staff, but it barely set the game back a week nevermind 30 years. Thendo, Rhino's Skin, kmk108 and 5 others 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 And anyway, Mourinho's decision to use Kenedy at LB was because he thought Norwich would play 3 at the back and that he would give us more impetus in attack.I think it was actually 5 or 4 man defence, not 3. Had Norwich played with 5, we would have played with 3. This also explains the inclusion of Ivanovic, who would have slotted in at CB. The choices were logical, hard to argue with that. Adnane 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhino's Skin 972 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I think it was actually 5 or 4 man defence, not 3. Had Norwich played with 5, we would have played with 3. This also explains the inclusion of Ivanovic, who would have slotted in at CB. The choices were logical, hard to argue with that.yup....good to see a bit of variation in tactics with the possibilty to change without making subs and not lose balance. Mourinho getting his mojo back....but more importantly, the players buying into it.Will be interesting v Spurs as they for once are hot favourites. But its a Sunday midday match after they have played 2.5k miles away from home on Thursday night. Makes a change for scheduling to suit us .......but could be hard for Mourinho to 2nd guess Spurs tactics and line up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,072 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 yup....good to see a bit of variation in tactics with the possibilty to change without making subs and not lose balance.Mourinho getting his mojo back....but more importantly, the players buying into it.Will be interesting v Spurs as they for once are hot favourites. But its a Sunday midday match after they have played 2.5k miles away from home on Thursday night.Makes a change for scheduling to suit us .......but could be hard for Mourinho to 2nd guess Spurs tactics and line upI'm guessing that Jose will guess they will use the same system as against West Ham so, subject to no further personnel changes being forced on them, he'd expect them to line up with; Loris, Walker, Alderweireld, Vertonghen, Rose, Dier, Dembele, Son, Mason, Eriksen, Kane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhino's Skin 972 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I'm guessing that Jose will guess they will use the same system as against West Ham so, subject to no further personnel changes being forced on them, he'd expect them to line up with; Loris, Walker, Alderweireld, Vertonghen, Rose, Dier, Dembele, Son, Mason, Eriksen, Kane.you reckon Spurs will play a "2nd team" on Thursday or include players you mention?As I said, it could be interesting if a number were involved Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,072 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 you reckon Spurs will play a "2nd team" on Thursday or include players you mention?As I said, it could be interesting if a number were involvedI think they'll rotate in midweek. Doubtless some starters will appear but I'd expect quite a few to be excused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhino's Skin 972 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I think they'll rotate in midweek. Doubtless some starters will appear but I'd expect quite a few to be excused.lets hope Mourinho gets it right.....I think you are right about formation and players above.Wouldnt want to wish an injury or 2 on anyone...perhaps a bit of tiredness leading to a strain on Sunday early on though wouldnt go amiss....(clutching at straws) for us to gain an advantage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 More Here: http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/20746-maccabi-tel-aviv-v-chelsea/page-4#entry1179722 Jusek, stroey and Blue Armour 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Jose talking about RLC again, hopefully this means an appearance todayOne game before disappearing again. Nothing to get excited about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Urm...Mourinho said in public he and the medical staff had their meeting.Why should the details of that be public?Just to satisfy do gooders like le saux in his new role ?Remember he was also mouthing off about how the incident affected team form and the dressing room........yet again....how does he know?So whilst its alright for GLS to have a big dig at our club and manager, its not ok for Mourinho to have a little one (just a name drop) back?mourinho is the highest paid manager in the world. he is under the spotlight, and will be analysed by every angle. and when his behaviour is controversial, not everyone will be impressed. he dosen't need to rise to every criticism. just showing his paranoia and insecurity^ Not one, but two big digs.i read both of them, hardly massive digs at all. just concerned comments, that the squad does not respond to the negativity , and that jose handled the carneiro situation badly. neither of which is difficult to agree with.. Muzchap and zolayes 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhino's Skin 972 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Its only over reactionarys like your goodself that make it an issue though.His comment ( name drop ) pales into the background when compared to Le Sauxs comments when he didnt know the ful facts.Expected better of a recent club ambassador who knew his ill advised comments would be plastered all over the media.Le Saux jumping on the bad nouthing of Mourinho and the club to self promote his new role....yup...stinks of it Essien19 and stroey 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Jose talking about RLC again, hopefully this means an appearance todayWhere's this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Where's this?http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/11/24/9790296/mourinho-tells-ruben-loftus-cheek-to-be-more-like-kurt-zouma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 no le saux dosen't know the "facts", which is why he used terms like "i think". "his behaviour may" "it feels like" are people not allowed an opinion?nowhere did he criticise jose's managerial quality, just his attitude, and the effect it has zolayes and Muzchap 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adnane 1,101 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 ^ Not one, but two big digs.Such mislead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essien19 1,415 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 no le saux dosen't know the "facts", which is why he used terms like "i think". "his behaviour may" "it feels like" are people not allowed an opinion?nowhere did he criticise jose's managerial quality, just his attitude, and the effect it hasWhy can't he say it face to face, why go to the media?I think he's out for blood and wanted it this way, can't stand those people.Yes, Mourinho shouldn't have mentioned Eva back in the day, but it was in the heat of the moment, the one from le saux was thought out. stroey 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Why can't he say it face to face, why go to the media?I think he's out for blood and wanted it this way, can't stand those people.Yes, Mourinho shouldn't have mentioned Eva back in the day, but it was in the heat of the moment, the one from le saux was thought out.heat of the moment from Jose ,, but too arrogant to apologise. Muzchap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Why can't he say it face to face, why go to the media?I think he's out for blood and wanted it this way, can't stand those people.Yes, Mourinho shouldn't have mentioned Eva back in the day, but it was in the heat of the moment, the one from le saux was thought out.because mourinho dosen't have time to meet everyone with an opinion? do you see le saux knocking on joses door and saying "hi jose, just stopped to tell you face to face, that the siege mentality isn't working"i can't comprehend why he would be out for blood, the comments are not malicious in anyway, just concerned. the mourinho fans on here, act as if le saux said," jose is a terrible manager, he disgusts me"similarly ballack and all these other guys, could have supported mourinho face to face. Muzchap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essien19 1,415 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 heat of the moment from Jose ,, but too arrogant to apologise.Would have been better, if Jose publicly backed her afterwards. One can say that.Jose seems one of those guys, who only reacts to strength, not weakness.On the whole, neither of us don't know what really happened in the background.Eva's reaction(in her past, she posted very rarely on Facebook) weren't good either.She alone made the call to stop showing up for work, that wasn't necessary, she put her personal needs over the club ones,at the end of the day, she let the team down.Maybe the world has changed over the years, guys like Ferguson weren't nice either.I think a lot of people can't stand a proper hairdryer treatment anymore, Eva didn't get that, way more harmless.Sadly, it was enough.Now we have to get on with life and the club.Can't live forever in the past. GodZola 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.