Jump to content

The Mourinho Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

Always been an admirer of Mou's defensive approach and counter attacking football. But at the current Chelsea, we're not even solid defensively.

Corners/Crosses:

Can you count how many we've conceded through crosses or corners lately?

Aston Villa 1-1 (cross)

Burnley 1-1 (corner)

1st leg PSG, 1-1 (cross)

+ 3-4 headed chances, thank Courtois for not conceding more.

Westham 0-1, thanks to Courtois and Sakho for not conceding.

2nd leg PSG, 2 goals through corners, Silva is 1m83 and many of ours are near 1m90. How could he have those 2 free headers?

We used to grind out 1-0/2-1 with good defending and especially in set pieces/crosses with big guys. What's the problem? Is it Cech, who normally organizes the defence? Now we have Terry to do that, could that be a problem?

I like Courtois, but if that's the problem, Mou should let Courtois organize the defence or recall Cech. We looked quite impressive in the 2-0 COC final btw and have many clean sheets with Cech this season, coincidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm laughing my ass off at these comments if wanting to sack Mourinho, yes he has made some mistakes this season and yes we've not been playing nice football the last few months but we just fucking won the Capitol Cup and the EPL is ours to lose.

From potential Quadruple to Capital One Cup only be the end of the season is sackable offense to me. If we win the BPL though I would give him another year but he needs to learn from this mistake, or he will have to go in summer 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason why we're leaking goals is because as soon as we get a goal we drop so deep that PSG actually end of having chances with 10 men. We need to put pressure instead so that we atleast get a second goal or that we can keep a cleansheet. You can't drop deep and expect the likes of Cavani, Lavezzi etc do nothing. The same tactic that lost us the games against Tottenham, Newcastle etc, lost us this game aswell. Shit has got to change or we this will happen next year in the CL again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From potential Quadruple to Capital One Cup only be the end of the season is sackable offense to me. If we win the BPL though I would give him another year but he needs to learn from this mistake, or he will have to go in summer 2016.

Don't be silly. The quadruple was never going to happen. I had a better chance ending up with Kelly Brook.

Who is supposed to take over after sacking Mou btw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't be silly. The quadruple was never going to happen. I had a better chance ending up with Kelly Brook.

Who is supposed to take over after sacking Mou btw?

If someone like pellegrini can do the same as Mourinho while playing better with the same resources then I will say anyone better then pellegrini.

But not now since we are in course of winning the Premier League.

Next season if we regress then it will be time.

Because many people are forgetting the resources equation when comparing managers.

Give someone similar resources and might produce the same as we seen in city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great point but your leaving something out.

Simeone Atletico and klopp budget ain't the same as Chelsea.

If you should be comparing us then it should be to City pellegrini as we are in the same category.

And in that view Mourinho will have achieved exactly the same thing pellegrini did last season.

Carling cup, Premier League and last 16...

would be amazing to see Simeone or Klopp as EPL managers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, no one has been 'good enough'. Ranieri, Grant, Scolari, Ancelotti, AVB, RDM, Benitez. There is no manager that is visibly superior to Mou, looking at the results that is. So you can sack Mou, but it will be the same for any manager that takes over. Unless you get lucky and get someone who delivers instant and great succes.

Look at Barca. After Pep, they went with Tito. Not good enough. Then Martino. Not good enough. Now Enrique. Not good enough.. no wait, there's been a revival so let's give him some more time. If he does not win the title or CL, he'll probably not be good enough either.

Even though I'm not his biggest fan, it would probably be for the best to stick with Mou for the next 4-5 years. Unless there's some freakish decline of course, that goes without saying.

Ancelotti and Benitez have a case I think.

Carlo one good season and bad season.

Benitez hated by many but was not that bad.

Mourinho so far one good season and bad.

Giving the resources of Chelsea I have not seen nothing of greatness that some other manager cannot do.

Again giving the resources.

But I agree with you, there's no point sacking now.

It will be more of a concern if next season we are in the same situation.

By then we can say he will never learn as he's just stubborn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great point but your leaving something out.

Simeone Atletico and klopp budget ain't the same as Chelsea.

If you should be comparing us then it should be to City pellegrini as we are in the same category.

And in that view Mourinho will have achieved exactly the same thing pellegrini did last season.

Carling cup, Premier League and last 16...

what budget? are u kidding me?

we have a net spend of 42mil pounds in the last 2 years under jose (thorgan not included).

bvb have a net spend of 66.7 mil euros.

now just tell me what percentage of ATM's goals this season have been thru open plays and set pieces. whenever i have watched atm this season, they hav been woeful (except against RM) and generally have had to rely on the set piece dominance. whats worse is simeone and jose are very much alike in their approach to the game. i saw both of ATM's latest games against valencia and sevilla and anyone who is complaining about jose being negative would not even have mentioned simeone as a replacement.

classic case of people just wanting something different even if its no where near as good.

ps - compared to us city have had a net spend of 125mil pounds. almost thrice our sum. city had a proper set team compared to ours which was in transition. well, comparing jose and pelegrini is one of the worst things u can do here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what budget? are u kidding me?

we have a net spend of 42mil pounds in the last 2 years under jose (thorgan not included).

bvb have a net spend of 66.7 mil euros.

now just tell me what percentage of ATM's goals this season have been thru open plays and set pieces. whenever i have watched atm this season, they hav been woeful (except against RM) and generally have had to rely on the set piece dominance. whats worse is simeone and jose are very much alike in their approach to the game. i saw both of ATM's latest games against valencia and sevilla and anyone who is complaining about jose being negative would not even have mentioned simeone as a replacement.

classic case of people just wanting something different even if its no where near as good.

ps - compared to us city have had a net spend of 125mil pounds. almost thrice our sum. city had a proper set team compared to ours which was in transition. well, comparing jose and pelegrini is one of the worst things u can do here.

This isn't Chelsea of 2005 anymore, his net spend since return has been £36m, in this current football market that is fuck all, and has managed to turn around an unbalanced mess of a squad into title material.

Would 'any' manager pull that off? not a chance, for perspective LVG got given a blank chequebook last summer and created an even bigger mess than what he inherited.

Well if you guys going on about Net spend, I think that's what Real Madrid has been doing as of late.

Buy and then sell.

Di Maria recently, Ozil last season.

But it's still not the same comparing that with A. Madrid and Dortmund.

I still say you have to compare us with City, Real Madrid and such that have big budget and assets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you guys going on about Net spend, I think that's what Real Madrid has been doing as of late.

Buy and then sell.

Di Maria recently, Ozil last season.

But it's still not the same comparing that with A. Madrid and Dortmund.

I still say you have to compare us with City, Real Madrid and such that have big budget and assets.

credit where its due. RM have done that and they have done it very well. you have to take into account selling their best player of last season (ADM) to buy james. if they had not sold ADM, they would not have been in this current mess. similarly we sold the likes of KDB, to get the players we wanted, why should that be neglected? why should the sale of luiz be neglected who would have been far better for this current system than GC!!! net spend is the correct way to look at things. bvb have a greater net spend than us, and city have a triple net spend than us for the same area despite the fact that pelegrini acquired a squad which was already winning titles compared to ours which was a mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You