Jump to content

Man City 1-1 Chelsea


Jase
 Share

Man of the Match  

129 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is your Man of the Match?



Recommended Posts

...think you should get your head out of your arse thinking we all have the same short-sighted, disrespectful and childish opinion as you.

That's what you said to me.

You had to make it personal against me, my head, arse, childish???

That was rude and unnecessary. You have your opinion I have mine.

I PERSONALLY feel what FRANK did was highly disrespectful.

God it's never going to be the same again , i have every season review and it's going to be so hard to watch them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 494
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If it in his contract though could hardly refuse..doubt he expected to come on least of all score against us which we all knew would happen anyway just because

I believe he only agreed to go on loan to City if he didn't play against us if I recall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a big deal and we can say 'oh it was own game' but it was a game we should have won no thanks to our supposed 'legend'. He could have just hanged about but he was desperate to score and his laughing in his post match interview was heartbreaking.

FINALLY. Someone has the balls to say it.

But I don't get this? Why should he not want to score? He is playing for a football club against another football club. He is employed to try to make his team win football matches. If he doesn't try to score, he isn't doing his job. Why should he not do his job just because he used to do the same job for his opponents? It goes against his profession attitude and his contract. He was desperate to score because he wanted to do his job. He would have been in the same place against any other team. It doesn't remove his legend status because he did his job for another team.

What would Man City supporters think if he just stood in the middle of the pitch for 20 minutes. He is paid to play for them, he has no reason not to regardless of who he is playing against. It would be disrespectful if he hadn't played as well as he could for his club (employers). Would you not feel guilty if on payday your money came into your bank account but you know during the month you have bunker off work early, not done what is required of you and damaged your company by not helping the people you work for, who you are letting down as well? I think they'd be pretty pissed that you were getting paid as much as them for half the effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a side note, is anyone impressed with Mangala? Seems like he is one of the strongest and fastest CB in the league by the look of thing, could become a Benatia for City. £32m might have seem to be a lot by the summer but by next it might look like a bargain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe he only agreed to go on loan to City if he didn't play against us if I recall.

Funny I remember that, guess we are all mugs for believing that. The people who during the game screamed his name and put off the people ACTUALLY playing for us, can't believe it.

I knew it the minute Frank came on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what you said to me.

You had to make it personal against me, my head, arse, childish???

That was rude and unnecessary. You have your opinion I have mine.

I PERSONALLY feel what FRANK did was highly disrespectful.

God it's never going to be the same again , i have every season review and it's going to be so hard to watch them.

It's a common phrase that means the person you are directing the comment at is being arrogant. It isn't personal to you and your body, more your opinion. You reacted in an over sensitive manner.

what you originally said is that everyone agrees with you deep down or something and that you have the balls to say these things. Is that being disrespectful by saying that people should not think for themselves or that your opinion is more worthy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I don't get this? Why should he not want to score? He is playing for a football club against another football club. He is employed to try to make his team win football matches. If he doesn't try to score, he isn't doing his job. Why should he not do his job just because he used to do the same job for his opponents? It goes against his profession attitude and his contract. He was desperate to score because he wanted to do his job. He would have been in the same place against any other team. It doesn't remove his legend status because he did his job for another team.

What would Man City supporters think if he just stood in the middle of the pitch for 20 minutes. He is paid to play for them, he has no reason not to regardless of who he is playing against. It would be disrespectful if he hadn't played as well as he could for his club (employers). Would you not feel guilty if on payday your money came into your bank account but you know during the month you have bunker off work early, not done what is required of you and damaged your company by not helping the people you work for, who you are letting down as well? I think they'd be pretty pissed that you were getting paid as much as them for half the effort.

Mate I am so bored of this and don't want to argue.

We have HUGELY different viewpoints on this matter. That is fine. I have my opjnion, you have yours.

I THINK it was so disrespectful to us, he's been at City two seconds he didn't owe them anything. He knew it would take the victory for us and points and the headlines. If I hear "Lampards wonderful goal against Chelsea' on TV anymore times, I'll be sick.

It's a common phrase that means the person you are directing the comment at is being arrogant. It isn't personal to you and your body, more your opinion. You reacted in an over sensitive manner.

what you originally said is that everyone agrees with you deep down or something and that you have the balls to say these things. Is that being disrespectful by saying that people should not think for themselves or that your opinion is more worthy?

Look above, same answer so bored, we have hugely different opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way if we loose the league we can blame Frank for his goal..we didn't do enough to win the game they had 10 men

Iif we drop points elsewhere they'd be be part of the reason to not just this one game.Long way to go not over yet and come May no doubt this game be forgotten about/be less meaningful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realy? Man City the champions, the team we probably gonna rival with for the title this season, is no where near one of our biggest rivals? fascinating, tell me more.

They're not. Just because they're our title rivals doesn't mean they're OUR rivals. That's like saying Everton and Tottenham are rivals because they're fighting for a top 4 spot. I consider Leeds, QPR, Arsenal, Spurs, Millwall (especially Millwall) Fullham, West Ham bigger rivals than Man City

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes let's all move on. This is what Frank wanted all the headlines.

This morning I would have taken a point but it's always worst when you could have won the game.

We should have controlled the ball better and if Diego's shot had gone in and not hit the post we would have not been bickering over Frank we would be delighted we won the game.

It's disappointing to come so close but at least it wasn't 1-0 to them with him scoring that would have been way worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes let's all move on. This is what Frank wanted all the headlines.

This morning I would have taken a point but it's always worst when you could have won the game.

We should have controlled the ball better and if Diego's shot had gone in and not hit the post we would have not been bickering over Frank we would be delighted we won the game.

It's disappointing to come so close but at least it wasn't 1-0 to them with him scoring that would have been way worse.

Mate enough already. In your previous post you say you are sick argueing about it, but you continue to insult him in every post. You made your point. If you think that lampard should have just stand for twenty minutes in the center circle, fine. But do you expect the same of fabregas when we play le arse or is that something different?

Edited by borriske
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the fuck are people talking about this game as title deciding?

Atm we are still 3 points clear from second place and 5pts clear from City. Right now we would be champions. If we will lose title its because of dropping points in next games, not drawing against City. It all depends on how we will play now on.

After cooling my head, the result is more than fair. We didnt take one single shot before Zabaleta red and even after that, we only did it about what 3 times? In whole game from so called best attack in league, that is bit shocking. The way we answered after conceding was another proof we still have a lot to work on in next games. Mourinho was confused, bringing Drogba?!? on the pitch and our midfield couldnt contain possesion for 1 minute. We completely fell apart despite having one more player on pitch and Mourinho, honestly speaking was kinda shocked that Lamps scored and left in shock till end of the game.

Stop bitching, it was fair result and we are still 5 pts clear from IMO our only real contender for title this year. BTW Mangala was outstanding today, but I have seen him play before, he can be amazing one game and very bad in next one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...