Jump to content

Graham Potter Thread


ZAPHOD2319
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Vegetable said:

This is something that bugs me. This "project", especially after previous two windows and potential third being big pretty much hangs on CL money. I thought missing on Europe this year is pretty much a disaster and reduces the transfer ambitions already due to FFP, but twice? We'd be pretty much forced to start from scratch and it will have an impact on us for years. I'm sure they simulated this variant as one of many, but how probable they thought it was?

Yeah I think there 2 main disagreements in this thread: One about whether Potter deserved the shot or not--I personally think he has not done enough simple as.

The second, is that I don't think some folks here understand, or perhaps don't accept, what Chelsea (club) is these days. I hear folks talking about a long-term project as if Chelsea had the luxury of burning seasons in name of some way of play, of a philosophy, or conducting the business. These are acquired over years and years of consistent decision making. We DID have a DNA as a club under Abramovich. It may not have been the DNA folks wanted, but there was one.

Now, think about sponsorships, prize money, the ability to acquire as well as *retain* talent... How can someone think a club like Chelsea isn't *constantly* under pressure to win is beyond me.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually seeing a large part of our dumb ass fanbase calling for Mourinho to come back.

If that happens... it would be the most backwards move you could make with the investment into youth that has been made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DDA said:

I'm actually seeing a large part of our dumb ass fanbase calling for Mourinho to come back.

If that happens... it would be the most backwards move you could make with the investment into youth that has been made.

Going back to the toxic ex-girlfriend syndrome. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

We DID have a DNA as a club under Abramovich. It may not have been the DNA folks wanted, but there was one.

Now, think about sponsorships, prize money, the ability to acquire as well as *retain* talent... How can someone think a club like Chelsea isn't *constantly* under pressure to win is beyond me.

So what was the DNA? Just look at the coaches and the styles of play we had in the last couple of years.

We had Conte, a very emotional manager who tried to motivate the players a lot from the sidelines and had a lot of passion - focussing on pressing and powerful counterattacking, prefering experienced players.

Then we went on to Sarri, a rather calm but tactical guy, focussing on positional and combination play with a lot of possession.

Then we went on to Lampard, a very inexperienced coach but young and hungry, new generation of coaches, club legend trying to have a bigger bond between manager and fans, trying to implement a lot of youth players.

 

So 3 managers, 3 different types of personality, age and coaching style and 3 different philosophies of who and how to play on the pitch. Thats not a DNA. 

Edited by Gundalf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DDA said:

I'm actually seeing a large part of our dumb ass fanbase calling for Mourinho to come back.

If that happens... it would be the most backwards move you could make with the investment into youth that has been made.

This is normal because we've hit rock bottom anyone outside Potter and you upgrade massively immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hamilton said:

If he would have more experience Kompany would be a possibility, he is the guy who hits the table at half time in a game like today 

If Kompany keeps progressing, surely Citeh will start to look at him as Pep's potential successor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That interview, about making changes, wow. The guy is just deluded. We were hopelessly and hilariously outplayed by a team who are 20th.

The longer Boehly and co back this guy will only be more detrimental to this clubs long term success. Barring a few good January signings their repeated faith in this guy is laughable and makes me very very nervous. How far will they let us fall off the cliff? 

Edited by OneMoSalah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, xPetrCechx said:

%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%9D-%D7%9E%D7

Not surprising. They might come to their senses as the atmosphere at games deteriorates even further. It's going to be a bumpy rest of the season.

On Potter. What a clueless non-entity. Just some guy who won the lottery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are effed. Unless a world class manager becomes availible by this summer. Having to stick with potter for another season would be so detrimental to the squad and would get us in trouble with FFP (like we already aren't, 90% of our signings are pure shit and half of those are on long term contracts).

It may take a long time to recover from this. We are missing out on UCL revenue next season and if the board persist with Potter it may well be for the season after that as well. Noone is going to want to touch our club until we can prove we can develop them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gundalf said:

So what was the DNA? Just look at the coaches and the styles of play we had in the last couple of years.

We had Conte, a very emotional manager who tried to motivate the players a lot from the sidelines and had a lot of passion - focussing on pressing and powerful counterattacking, prefering experienced players.

Then we went on to Sarri, a rather calm but tactical guy, focussing on positional and combination play with a lot of possession.

Then we went on to Lampard, a very inexperienced coach but young and hungry, new generation of coaches, club legend trying to have a bigger bond between manager and fans, trying to implement a lot of youth players.

 

So 3 managers, 3 different types of personality, age and coaching style and 3 different philosophies of who and how to play on the pitch. Thats not a DNA. 

Different things right? the way of playing is indeed tied to manager AND players. In my view only perhaps 3-4 managers employ a particular style of play (some share similar/same style too), the most obvious one is Pep with the high line and 100% possession football.

I think aside from these very specific managers, you won't get what you want and I cannot fathom why someone would think Potter would be able to deliver that considering there is nothing remarkable about his teams (like Brighton). Don't think Potter is that much more experienced than Lampard either -- they both have accomplished very little in football as managers. Literally ANYONE can make a group of good players perform well. The tricky part is always always winning!

The ruthlessness we had, precisely with the constant pressure and sacking, was the *club's* DNA. Evidently not the one you like, but I personally, think there are many ways of playing and winning in football. And once again, I don't see why Potter has to be the chosen one to take us to wherever the new owner wants to go. They both look pretty lost to me.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You