Chelsea Transfers

[Vesper 30,270]

1 minute ago, avrobsws said:

Lewin, thanks to Google keyboard 😆

All good m8!

[OhForAGreavsie 6,091]

45 minutes ago, avrobsws said:

Are we serious ? We are considering this Lewis as an alternative to Haland ? Tuchel has gone nuts if this is true or gambling big time and putting his ass on the line.

 

 

This lad has over 125,000 subscribers. He seems a nice bloke and I'm pleased for him that hIs channel is a success but I really don't see why. There is no news value in what he says because it is all published elsewhere first. Yes, he has opinions but so does everyone.

Still, good luck to him with the channel. I wish him well.

Edited July 3, 2021 by OhForAGreavsie

[Vesper 30,270]

2 minutes ago, avrobsws said:

Lewin, thanks to Google keyboard 😆 He is now where near to to Haaland.

But we may (likely) not get Håland or Mbappe or Lewa or Lukaku or Kane.

We so need other options at CF. Isak is now off the board, leaving DCL and Vlahovic as the last 2 I truly rate to buy, plus Lautaro, he doesn't seem a good fit. Jonathan David needs another year seasoning for me to make that call, unless we really do roll the iron dice.

Nothing special at all left after all I listed. Gabriel Jesus?? As if Pep would sell to us anyway, unless we plonked down £90-100m, which is insane.

This all is IF, I state again, we fail on the big 5 above. 

[avrobsws 29]

Doku was outstanding yesterday, I am sure he will be fetching money from the top tiers soon. I would be happy if we can sign him as a rotation but will cost pretty.

Edited July 3, 2021 by avrobsws

[OhForAGreavsie 6,091]

4 minutes ago, Vesper said:

But we may (likely) not get Håland or Mbappe or Lewa or Lukaku or Kane.

We so need other options at CF. Isak is now off the board, leaving DCL and Vlahovic as the last 2 I truly rate to buy, plus Lautaro, he doesn't seem a good fit. Jonathan David needs another year seasoning for me to make that call, unless we really do roll the iron dice.

Nothing special at all left after all I listed. Gabriel Jesus?? As if Pep would sell to us anyway, unless we plonked down £90-100m, which is insane.

This all is IF, I state again, we fail on the big 5 above. 

I'm a non believer when it comes to Gabriel. When he was being linked to City, and reported to be replacing Aguero, I posted here to say that I would be delighted if that happened. I thought Gabriel would be a serious downgrade. He's not good enough for Manchester City. if they persevere with him then that's good news in my book If they manage to offload him to us I'll be disappointed

[Vesper 30,270]

1 minute ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

I'm a non believer when it comes to Gabriel. When he was being linked to City, and reported to be replacing Aguero, I posted here to say that I would be delighted if that happened. I thought Gabriel would be a serious downgrade. He's not good enough for Manchester City. if they persevere with him then that's good news in my book If they manage to offload him to us I'll be disappointed

I probably was not clear enough. I do NOT, repeat do NOT want Gabriel. Do not rate him. I was just posting him as what/who would be tossed up as a rebuttal to my only acceptable targets to step right in.

My list has been pretty stable, and most know I have rated DCL for several years, so this not Vesper hopping on some new bandwagon for him.

[Jase 43,479]

1 hour ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

You are talking about two entirely different things here. You and I are in complete agreement that Emerson's value is not going to increase as a result of one or two appearances at the Euros. I expect that everyone here agrees with us about that reality. When we are considering the theoretical possibility that his value TO POTENTIAL BUYERS increases however, that only helps Chelsea. There is no scenario under which this situation would be bad for Chelsea or the player. Remember it is the situation where Emerson's value,  VALUE not price, increases that we have been discussing.

Chelsea can name any price they want but a deal can only be reached when Chelsea and a potential buyer agree on a fee. Under all circumstances if the buyer is prepared to pay more today than they were prepared to pay yesterday that makes it easier for Chelsea to find such an agreement. THE INCREASED VALUE HELPS Chelsea IT NEVER HURTS THEM.

If I am talking about two entirely different things here, then so are you. I don't know why you keep on going about the value here when I have been talking about the price start and it was Hashishi's point to begin with. At the end of the fucking day, if no club are willing to pay the asking price, then it means fucking all.

If you want to keep on going about such an innocuous stuff, then agree to disagree. 

[King Kante 1,643]

1 hour ago, avrobsws said:

Doku was outstanding yesterday, I am sure he will be fetching money from the top tiers soon. I would be happy if we can sign him as a rotation but will cost pretty.

I want him so will can simply call him Count Doku. 

[Styl1994 188]

1 hour ago, avrobsws said:

Doku was outstanding yesterday, I am sure he will be fetching money from the top tiers soon. I would be happy if we can sign him as a rotation but will cost pretty.

Dortmund should buy him tbh

[Jase 43,479]

I believe Doku has been linked with Liverpool recently.

[Jase 43,479]

 

[Jase 43,479]

Potential option for the backup keeper...

 

[OhForAGreavsie 6,091]

1 hour ago, Jas said:

If I am talking about two entirely different things here, then so are you. I don't know why you keep on going about the value here when I have been talking about the price start and it was Hashishi's point to begin with. At the end of the fucking day, if no club are willing to pay the asking price, then it means fucking all.

If you want to keep on going about such an innocuous stuff, then agree to disagree. 

I suggest that you read your own posts. I agree with you however that we've exhausted this conversation.

[Jase 43,479]

4 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

I suggest that you read your own posts.

I know what point I was making...

[OhForAGreavsie 6,091]

17 hours ago, Jas said:

Err, is it a good thing if the value goes up for an unwanted player? That would just mean less clubs can afford in signing him.

 

[Jase 43,479]

2 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

 

By value there, I meant price, the transfer fee and that was reflected in the subsequent reply to the OP. 

[Hashishi 148]

Stop blaming the original poster. You confused yourself and everyone along with you. 

[OhForAGreavsie 6,091]

2 minutes ago, Jas said:

By value there, I meant price, the transfer fee and that was reflected in the subsequent reply to the OP. 

We are not mind readers Jas. If you failed to say what you meant to say then make the correction and allow the conversation to move forward. Instead you've been labouring a point which makes no sense in context. @Hashishispeculated about good performances leading to a player's value, his value, going up. You questioned if that would be a good thing from Chelsea's point of view. Well of course it is a good thing. Nobody except you is talking about his price going up. That's an illogicality you just made up.

 

 

[Jase 43,479]

4 minutes ago, Hashishi said:

Stop blaming the original poster. You confused yourself and everyone along with you. 

I wasn't even blaming you. All I said I was just replying to your post. 

[Jase 43,479]

1 hour ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

We are not mind readers Jas. If you failed to say what you meant to say then make the correction and allow the conversation to move forward. Instead you've been labouring a point which makes no sense in context. @Hashishispeculated about good performances leading to a player's value, his value, going up. You questioned if that would be a good thing from Chelsea's point of view. Well of course it is a good thing. Nobody except you is talking about his price going up. That's an illogicality you just made up.

The ironic thing about this is that the original conversation I had with Hashishi was already long over by the time you quoted my reply and before it became this. Maybe Clockwork had a point the other day in the RLC thread. Maybe we just have a different definition of those terms etc and I apologize for not spelling things out clearly..