Chelsea Transfers

[whats happening 1,525]

1 minute ago, Pizy said:

Imagine if they do what we were meant to do and immediately sign up Lavia afterwards. 

Then wtf do we do? Go into the season with Adams and Ugo as our DM’s? We might be in the mud by Christmas.

they wont sign both, relax. also, we might not sign either ;D

[ZAPHOD2319 4,466]

I had to look. It is more embarrassing that the members at the Shed End are being more reasonable about if we don’t buy him. 

[ZAPHOD2319 4,466]

 

[shrenshah 186]

Dont understand why we bid for lavia yest before closing caicedo.

Noob move by our board. Now its an ego buy from liverpool.

 

I would say let liverpool overpay, caicedo is not 106m worth. Would rather we get lavia and palhinha if we want 2 more.

[ZAPHOD2319 4,466]

 

[whats happening 1,525]

seems like our board doesnt even want him that bad. 

[DDA 9,689]

Liverpool are fuming at our Lavia bid 😂 they are proper triggered.

If they end up with both Caicedo and Lavia... my word what a blunder by our lot. 

[Pizy 18,360]

And there’s Fabrizio saying it’s all but done.

Well done to the board. Pissed up a wall all summer spunking money on kids that may or may not ever make it as Chelsea players while the player our manager desperately needed to get us back into Europe we fail to get him after chasing him for months.

[MoroccanBlue 5,291]

Board have failed this team and Pochetinno. 
 

Lost for words. 

[Pizy 18,360]

And what’s worse is that it’s not like the club can go “we didn’t get Caicedo so we’ll go out and get  ____ who is just as good or better.” Because there are no DM’s available that are as good as he is. Anyone else we’d be buying purely on potential. 

Fucking sickening.

[MoroccanBlue 5,291]

Onstein official. 
 

Unfuckingbelievable. 

[turgi 71]

Surprise surprise 

[NikkiCFC 7,927]

13 minutes ago, shrenshah said:

Dont understand why we bid for lavia yest before closing caicedo.

Noob move by our board. Now its an ego buy from liverpool.

 

I would say let liverpool overpay, caicedo is not 106m worth. Would rather we get lavia and palhinha if we want 2 more.

Maybe we bid for Lavia because we knew we were losing Caicedo. 

[Stats 7,048]

I will be fuming if Caicedo ends up at Liverpool. This should never have got to this stage. Would be more embarrassing than the Mudryk saga. Arsenal did not need him. We need Caicedo after letting so many CM go. Should never have got to this stage. Embarrassing. I will be fuming with this, especially considering his age also.

Edited August 11, 2023 by Stats

[MoroccanBlue 5,291]

Just now, NikkiCFC said:

Maybe we bid for Lavia because we knew we were losing Caicedo. 

Doesn’t matter. What we offered tonight a month ago, he’d be a Chelsea player. 
 

Fucking fuming. But hey we got 83 Brazilian wonder kids to look forward to in 5 years. 

[shrenshah 186]

Dont think we can make top 5 now

[NikkiCFC 7,927]

They offering 110m. Do people really think we should go over it? 

[MoroccanBlue 5,291]

Just now, NikkiCFC said:

They offering 110m. Do people really think we should go over it? 

Doesn’t matter. Again, if we bid 100m a month ago like they fucking asked he’d be a Chelsea player! 
 

We blew our most important target!